Blueboy Downunder Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 looks like a change of formation in the second half might be what we need....well, we at least need to try something. 4 at the back with mokoena infront of the back four with 3 across the middle and 2 blokes up front......
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Flopsy Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 MGP might go up front - Thommo on right emmo left
modes98 Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 (edited) wba take the lead 2-1 something to celebrate 50 yellow cards! Dickov has a free header 6 yards out and manages to hit schwarzer in the middle of the goal! Edited February 5, 2005 by modes98
modes98 Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 (edited) at last 4-4-2 moko off jemal on! norwich 2-2 wba Edited February 5, 2005 by modes98
modes98 Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 Oh how the tables turn boro now playing 4-5-1 (danny graham lone striker)
yellowsubmarine Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 Goals goals goals... where are they???
modes98 Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 (edited) Reid is coming on for thommo! Could this mean 4-3-3??? mgp up front? Edited February 5, 2005 by modes98
Alex Rover Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 Goals goals goals... where are they??? They went with Andrew Cole
doctorryan Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 Goals goals goals... where are they??? What are they?
sleepyjack Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 Reid coming on for Thompson. Come on Rovers.
Blackburn Ender Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 We haven't got anybody up front who you think will get a goal. Specially not Dickov. Other results going our way though.
LeChuck Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 Why has Hughes suddenly decided to go back to the 4-5-1 formation which made us useless the first time he used it? We have to score GOALS to stay up, Dickov isn't going to get that many on his own so he needs a partner. We were looking really solid when we were playing 4-4-2 so what's the point in changing...for an ex-striker this is just baffling and it's getting on my nerves now. He better sort his head quickly or we're going down.
modes98 Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 (edited) Possible penalty shout turned down! 2 hands on dickov and pushed ont eh edge of area. Norwich 3-2 WBA Edited February 5, 2005 by modes98
joey_big_nose Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 Virtually impossible to work out what is going on with these commentators. From what I can make sense of it seems we are utterly toothless.
Flopsy Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 Dickov needs a partner - Gally and Stead together doesnt work
Flopsy Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 Oh come on rovers - we're so @#/? Parlour off not that it matters
modes98 Posted February 5, 2005 Posted February 5, 2005 Oh come on rovers - we're so @#/? Parlour off not that it matters Great save by brad followed by parlour kicking the balll away! Come on you Rovers
Recommended Posts