Flopsy Posted July 22, 2005 Posted July 22, 2005 Got Clark - but about 50 runs to late me thinks Very good tactics from England - bowling wide off stump
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
brfcshabba Posted July 22, 2005 Posted July 22, 2005 Just when you think you are doing well (ish). Gilchrist walks to the crease
Eddie Posted July 22, 2005 Posted July 22, 2005 Oh well, just another couple and we're through the batting.
bellamy11 Posted July 22, 2005 Posted July 22, 2005 Stopped watching a couple of times and twice I've turned over to see a new batsman being introduced on-screen. I think I shall repeat the process. If these guys are skittled over quickly then the target is makeable but unlikely. I haven't seen enough from our top order to suggest that they can do this, but it wouldn't be impossible. Australia have to be big favourites.
Shaddy Posted July 22, 2005 Posted July 22, 2005 I don't know why you are all so negative... there is going to be at least two days, rain excluded, for England to chase down any target. I won't feel happy if Australia cannot bat two more sessions and set ... well, Gilchrist gone now... I was just about to say, set a 450+ run target. What is going on with Gilchrist and Ponting?
Eddie Posted July 22, 2005 Posted July 22, 2005 Well done England for dragging that back. That last hour of play put them back in with a good chance.
cn_barlow Posted July 22, 2005 Posted July 22, 2005 i just dont have the confidence in Englands top order to get anwhere near the runs required. The openers and vaughn along with freddy have done absolutely sod all with the bat this summer.....heres hoping they prove me wrong!!
Macky Posted July 22, 2005 Posted July 22, 2005 I'm pretty confident that we can do it. They have shown they can bat against Mcgrath in the one day matches. Pietersen batted well against him briefly this morning. There's plenty of time for England to get the runs. I've got a feeling Strauss is going to be the hero! Come On England! Been addicted to stick cricket over the last week or so! Quality game! StickCricket.com
stuwilky Posted July 22, 2005 Posted July 22, 2005 We only have a chance if we can bowl the aussies out by lunch tomorrow at the latest. The wicket is apalling, and getting worse as the game porgresses. Heres hoping that robot bowler cant keep this rate up for long!
Timmy Posted July 22, 2005 Author Posted July 22, 2005 check this out; http://www.channel4.com/sport/microsites/B.../bringiton.html
blue phil Posted July 22, 2005 Posted July 22, 2005 Anything under 350 is an attainable target . England have bottle these days ....Roll on tomorrow
Timmy Posted July 22, 2005 Author Posted July 22, 2005 Anything under 350 is an attainable target . England have bottle these days ....Roll on tomorrow 334303[/snapback] just hope we don't find ourselves 20-5, otherwise I be doing the rain dance
cn_barlow Posted July 22, 2005 Posted July 22, 2005 on a side note i dont actually think that winning the first test is so important for England. Obviously it would be nice to win for confidence but i can see the Aussie attack tiring towards the end of the series, especially with the back to back tests and so i think so long as we're still in itby the fourth test then we can definately do it!
brfcshabba Posted July 22, 2005 Posted July 22, 2005 England history of chasing over 300 Summary Number of Occasions Side Set 300 - 450 to Win 73 Wins (Team Achieved Target) 3 Losses (Team Failed to Achieve Target) 42 Matches Drawn 28 Matches Tied 0 Looks ominous
Eddie Posted July 22, 2005 Posted July 22, 2005 Also have to take into consideration how test cricket has changed over recent years. Teams score more runs generally, and the runs they do score they certainly score faster. Bigger targets are becoming more and more attainable. Now if we could avoid our second innings turning into the McGrath show like the first did I think we'd be alright.
philipl Posted July 23, 2005 Posted July 23, 2005 The crunch is ripping out the Australian tail. This morning is all about holding catches and taking the run out opportunities. If the England performance in the field hadn't been so weak yesterday, this match would be extremely winnable. Instead, assuming the target is 50 runs on from the Australian over night score, the second innings will be the supreme test of the England batting.
SouthAussieRover Posted July 23, 2005 Posted July 23, 2005 Isn't anything now on going to be a record requiring total in the fourth innings in order to win?
Flopsy Posted July 23, 2005 Posted July 23, 2005 More than likely - Ive got my head dress on and just off to start prancing around in the garden However this England team is the one most likely to do it (other than the Aussies anyway) If Trescothic/Straus/Vaughn actually get in and score some runs - who knows. Flintoff is due a big score too.
broadsword Posted July 23, 2005 Posted July 23, 2005 More than likely - Ive got my head dress on and just off to start prancing around in the garden 334355[/snapback] Just the usual Saturday then?
Shaddy Posted July 23, 2005 Posted July 23, 2005 If Australia survive to lunch, I still won't be satisfied, but feel the match is winnable for them.
bellamy11 Posted July 23, 2005 Posted July 23, 2005 (edited) Poor Jones. He must have had half a mind to drop that after the help (or lack of) he has had from Flintoff and Geraint. I don't give England much chance of chasing now. They had a chance overnight if the last three wickets fell cheaply but Katich played brilliantly and the tailenders survived off a combination of good play and inept fielding. Sad to say, but rain may well have to be the twelvth man. It's a shameful thing to look to but if the top order collapse again then we won't stand a chance. There's always the chance that the world class upper order will pull through for England. 400 runs is not impossible. However, you have to worry chasing 400 when we couldn't chase 200 in the 1st. Edited July 23, 2005 by bellamy11
Recommended Posts