FourLaneBlue Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 It's very easy to blame the manager, and as far as McLaren goes I agree that he is feckless, but you have to ask yourself why so many England managers have failed. There must be one common denominator.... Hmmm...Hoddle, Keegan, Sven, Maclaren... Is it that they are all cack?
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
LeChuck Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 Lampard seems to be taking a lot stick for last night when, in fact, he was no worse than most. It'll be interesting to see what McClaren does when the majority of players are fit, the only hope of an excuse he has is that he was forced into that team last night by absentees. I don't think he had it too far wrong in his first game in charge, if everyone was fit then I'd go for... Robinson Neville Ferdinand Terry A. Cole Gerrard Hargreaves Lampard J. Cole Rooney Johnson Having Crouch up top just encourages needless long balls from the back. Johnson's pace and ability to lead the line would let Rooney drop deep, as well as giving Gerrard and Lampard the option of playing balls in behind instead of into feet. Lennon and Crouch would be good impact players to bring from the bench should we need something different, but niether play with enough consistency to justify a starting place.
mjs Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 I also believe we will fail to qualify for the Euro's. When that happens though, McClaren will be sacked. I don't think we should wait that long.
speeeeeeedie Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 I didn't see the game and it sounds like I did the right thing. I saw Rio Ferdinand's interview later on and he did the usual "we'll get it right" routine. I hope so as it doesn't look good. Why play SWP? He can't get a game for Chelsea, how can he be sharp for international football? I've talked myself hoarse the number of times I've called for Lampard to be dropped. He doesn't have that bit extra to be good at international level. He's ace at Chelsea when he gets half a pitch to tee up his passes and shots, not for England though. England never do anything because we overhype the team, put too much pressure on whoever the manager is, rely on one or two players to carry the rest, and most worryingly we continue to develop technically substandard players.
Eddie Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 We'll qualify for the championships, but it will be a good day when McClaren goes.
joey_big_nose Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 Hmmm...Hoddle, Keegan, Sven, Maclaren... Is it that they are all cack? What I would say all of them lack the confidence to create a gameplan and stick to it. The good managers in the Premiership- Wenger, Mourinho, Ferguson, Allerdyce, our own Hughes all come into the clubs with a defined way they want to play with the resources they have and make the players fit that model. They stick with it. Sure club managers have the advantag eof being able to buy players in but you have to say that the England team does have a large selection of quality at it's disposal. Gerrard, Lampard, Hargreaves, Rooney, Ferdinand, Terry, Neville, A Cole, J Cole are all world class individuals. The likes of Robinson, Downing and Crouch while not brillaint are hardly poor players. And then, especially in the centre and wide right, we have a plethora of playes who can come in and work for England. Hoddle out of that four you have mentioned (and like Venables before him) was the one manager who looked like he was confident he knew the best way for the team to play (and with generally poorer players than we have now) and we reaped the benefit. McClaren needs to come up with a solution and an ethic and apply it come hell or high water and be willing to take it on the chin if it doesn't work out. His own nervousness and chopping and changing is undermining the confidence of the team. The one thing that unites the other candidates like Allerdyce, Hiddink, O'neill who I feel woul have been much better choices for the job is that they have that bit of arrogance to impose their own style. McClaren needs to develop it because unless things radically change he is going to have the reputation as one of the worst England managers ever.
joey_big_nose Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 Lampard seems to be taking a lot stick for last night when, in fact, he was no worse than most. It'll be interesting to see what McClaren does when the majority of players are fit, the only hope of an excuse he has is that he was forced into that team last night by absentees. I don't think he had it too far wrong in his first game in charge, if everyone was fit then I'd go for... I don't have any problem with Lampard as such, he is a decent player. But he cannot play on the left and we need a holding player in the centre. And as Gerrard is a better player the only place for Franky to go is on the bench. I like the idea of Johnson up front, but I just feel Gerrard is wasted out right- especially when we have quality young wide players available like Lennon, Dyer and SWP who will use the touchline. Gerrard there makes us very narrow.
RoyRover Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 I don't know that having a full squad would have made much of a difference to the performance last night. England had a full squad at the World Cup and granted their best player wasn't even half way fit, but they were still awful. You have to look to the management of the team.
SuperStella Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 Look how many FIRST team players Spain left out their starting XI too, it wasnt just England Joaquin, Reyes, Fabregas, Torres, Alonso,
waggy Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 giving the job to a yes man like mcclaren,english football at international level will be as bad as it has been since the last century,we need a good manager,not some drip who was in a inch off getting sacked by boro,i'm just glad i've retired from the international scene,i even watched the bill instead off the match.
SuperStella Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 McLaren spent £65million at Boro....... Great manager............................. NOT
krislu Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 (edited) Surley Maclaren should get a lot of stick, I mean you have just lost 1-0 to Spain, how poor can you get?! When will the general English public understand that the England team just aint as good as you think? There is one reason why England never seem to win anything, one reason, YOU AINT GOOD ENOUGH! Getting a new manager in won't help one bit.. Edited February 8, 2007 by krislu
gazsimm Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 (edited) Surley Maclaren should get a lot of stick, I mean you have just lost 1-0 to Spain, how poor can you get?! When will the general English public understand that the England team just aint as good as you think? There is one reason why England never seem to win anything, one reason, YOU AINT GOOD ENOUGH! Getting a new manager in won't help one bit.. that is utter rubbish. with the players England can select, i think England could be one of the best nations around, it's just about getting the right man and getting the players to play in a system that works for them Edited February 8, 2007 by gazsimm
pleasure Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 I might be in the minority, but I feel a bit sorry for mcClaren. he's out of his depth and he knows it. he was never going to turn down the opportunity to manage England. the blame lies with the players, (bunch of big-time charlie's. don't have the hunger/ desire to play for England. it's been going on for years!), the FA, and in particular brian barwick. his TV and radio interviews prove the guy knows absolutely nothing about football - the 'knowledge' he has is minimal and comes solely from producing MOTD- and I'd question whether he was / is really a football fan. mcClaren isn't blameless. his team selections/ tactics are baffling, but more worryingly, - he seems to give venables too much of say input. 'el tel's' formations and coaching method's are decades out of date, but we're using them! *yes... yes, we got the semis of euro 96, but looking at it - the holland game aside we were pretty poor and lucky!* in short, barwick hired mcClaren and approved terry venereal's appointment, he should take the blame. if only we lived in an ideal world - where barwick would replace mcc and his staff, and then resign without a pay-off. (dreaming).
OJRovers Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 (edited) Its far too easy for the current 'club' of england players at the minute, they are bigger than the manager so have no-one to impress and no threat to their position eg Lampard, Rio, Gerrard, even Crouch. They get in the team no matter how well a) they are playing & other english players are playing. If he brought in some players like Barton, Nolan, Bentley(Rovers bias showing there), then at least Lampard and his chums would have to prove they are worth the starting place. At the moment people like J Jenas, K.Dyer, Carrick,Downing,SWP don't put any pressure on the team as non of them are in form themselves. If he could get scholes out of retirement that would help too! Edited February 8, 2007 by OJRovers
M-K Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 with the players England can select, i think England could be one of the best nations around, it's just about getting the right man and getting the players to play in a system that works for them History suggests you are completely wrong on that one.
gazsimm Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 History suggests you are completely wrong on that one. what's that got to do with history, if we had the right manager and the correct system in place i think we might of won a major trophy by now. We have some world class players, it's just about getting the players in a suitable system, which will help bring the best out of them
den Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 History suggests you are completely wrong on that one. Rankings suggest we are the 6th best team in the world, at the moment. 1 Brazil 2 Italy 3 Argentina 4 France 5 Germany 6 England 7 The Netherlands 8 Nigeria 9 Portugal 10 Czech Republic 11 Cameroon 12 Spain 13 Ukraine 14 Sweden 15 Croatia 16 Greece 17 Switzerland 18 Côte d'Ivoire 19 Egypt 20 Romania 21 Mexico 22 Guinea 23 Denmark 24 Russia 25 Poland 26 Scotland 27 Turkey 28 Ghana 29 Ecuador 30 Uruguay 31 USA 32 Tunisia 33 Serbia 34 Colombia 35 Paraguay 36 Mali 37 Slovakia 37 Iran 39 Australia 40 Chile 41 Senegal 42 Morocco 42 Bulgaria 44 Israel 45 Uzbekistan 46 Japan 47 Northern Ireland 48 Cuba 49 Republic of Ireland 50 Norway 51 Korea Republic 52 Finland 53 Belgium 54 FYR Macedonia 55 Angola 56 Honduras 57 Jamaica 58 Bosnia-Herzegovina 59 Qatar 60 Congo DR 61 Hungary 62 Burkina Faso 63 Zambia 64 Saudi Arabia 65 Austria 66 Togo 66 Costa Rica 68 Lithuania 69 South Africa 70 Belarus 70 Peru 72 Zimbabwe 73 Venezuela 74 Wales 74 Cyprus 76 Kuwait 77 Slovenia 78 Cape Verde Islands 78 Algeria 80 Panama 81 Canada 82 Iraq 83 China PR 84 Oman 85 Moldova 86 Albania 87 Trinidad and Tobago 88 United Arab Emirates 89 Congo 90 Latvia 91 Ethiopia 92 Haiti 93 Iceland 94 Jordan 95 Georgia 96 Gabon 97 Bahrain 98 Libya 99 Barbados 100 Guyana 101 Bolivia 102 Uganda 103 Malawi 104 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 105 Guatemala 106 Estonia 107 Botswana 108 Equatorial Guinea 109 Tanzania 110 Lebanon 111 Syria 112 Liberia 113 Sudan 114 Surinam 115 Benin 115 Namibia 117 Hong Kong 117 Malta 119 Rwanda 120 Burundi 121 Bermuda 122 Mauritania 123 Armenia 124 Thailand 125 Tajikistan 126 Singapore 127 Azerbaijan 128 Kenya 129 Mozambique 130 Seychelles 131 Palestine 131 New Zealand 133 Korea DPR 134 Vietnam 135 Gambia 136 Dominican Republic 137 Antigua & Barbuda 138 Kyrgyzstan 139 Eritrea 140 Yemen 141 Chad 142 Kazakhstan 143 St Kitts & Nevis 144 Mauritius 145 Sri Lanka 145 Myanmar 147 Bahamas 148 Niger 149 Indonesia 150 Laos 151 Bangladesh 151 Swaziland 151 Sierra Leone 154 Fiji 155 Turkmenistan 156 El Salvador 157 Malaysia 157 India 159 Liechtenstein 160 Maldives 160 St Lucia 160 Solomon Islands 163 Grenada 164 Lesotho 165 Andorra 166 Chinese Taipei 167 Vanuatu 168 Nicaragua 169 Turks and Caicos Islands 170 Nepal 171 Pakistan 172 Netherlands Antilles 173 Tahiti 174 Brunei Darussalam 175 New Caledonia 176 Cambodia 177 Papua New Guinea 178 Philippines 178 Afghanistan 180 Central African Republic 181 Mongolia 181 Faroe Islands 181 Dominica 184 Madagascar 185 Macau 186 Luxembourg 187 Comoros 188 Samoa 189 Tonga 190 Cayman Islands 191 Bhutan 192 British Virgin Islands 192 Guinea-Bissau 194 Somalia 195 San Marino 196 Puerto Rico 197 Anguilla 198 Cook Islands 199 Timor-Leste 199 Belize 199 Djibouti 199 São Tomé e Príncipe 199 Aruba 199 US Virgin Islands 199 Monserrat 199 Guam 199 American Samoa
mike at picture Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 England has some players who THINK they are world class. Step forward Mssrs Lampard, Ferdinand and Cashley Cole.
allrovertheworld Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 There is alot of sense being talked about this subject on this thread, and some of it is very easy to understand. Which makes it all the more strange that the FA and the management of england can't get it right. Some massive errors are being made like the Walcott thing in 06. Johnson playing on the right on his debut (Svens work), players out of form being given another chance when more hungry players are screaming for a go in the England squad. The selection of McCalren as a manager with only experience at Boro (as a first team manager). Then there is all the rubbish that goes along with the FA. Seems the whole set up lacks real direction and drive. Someone mention Scholes coming back, that would be a great move. But would he wan to get involed?
gazsimm Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 England has some players who THINK they are world class. Step forward Mssrs Lampard, Ferdinand and Cashley Cole. i wish Rovers had these players on their book A lot of nations would love to call on these players, it's just a shame we can't get the best out of them playing for England
M-K Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 what's that got to do with history, if we had the right manager and the correct system in place i think we might of won a major trophy by now. We have some world class players, it's just about getting the players in a suitable system, which will help bring the best out of them Because the same excuse has been used so many times now, it can't be true. England has long had a reasonable selection of players and many different managers have tried to turn them into winners, always without success. And I don't count Euro 96 as a high point, since England got to play every game at Wembley and still couldn't make the final. That's a big fat failure in any other nation's book. England brings in a charismatic ex-player for the Klinsmann / Rijkaard effect -- they get the Keegan effect instead. They bring in an expert manager with a huge list of honours, hoping for a Hiddink -- they wind up with Eriksson. Fact is, most supporters in England, or at least the ones working in the media, propagate the idea that England has every attribute required to win major football tournaments. The reality is that they have only done so once, with the key role being played by home advantage, and have never really threatened to repeat the feat.
gazsimm Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 Because the same excuse has been used so many times now, it can't be true. England has long had a reasonable selection of players and many different managers have tried to turn them into winners, always without success. And I don't count Euro 96 as a high point, since England got to play every game at Wembley and still couldn't make the final. That's a big fat failure in any other nation's book. England brings in a charismatic ex-player for the Klinsmann / Rijkaard effect -- they get the Keegan effect instead. They bring in an expert manager with a huge list of honours, hoping for a Hiddink -- they wind up with Eriksson. Fact is, most supporters in England, or at least the ones working in the media, propagate the idea that England has every attribute required to win major football tournaments. The reality is that they have only done so once, with the key role being played by home advantage, and have never really threatened to repeat the feat. If England had a top class manager who could get the best out of the players, you would see how good of squad England really have. After saying that if we could take bloody penalties god knows what we could have won
T4E Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 Hmmm...Hoddle, Keegan, Sven, Maclaren... Is it that they are all cack? Has every manager England have had since Sir Alf been cack then? It seems that England managers are deemed failures if they don't win the major tournament that England are quite clearly entitled to. No one has managed it since '66 - and thats because every single one has been @#/?? Methinks not.
AggyBlue Posted February 8, 2007 Posted February 8, 2007 and have never really threatened to repeat the feat. Apart from the times we've been cheated out of major competitions.
Recommended Posts