joeh8 Posted October 11, 2007 Posted October 11, 2007 Shearer/Bellamy up front eh.....JHC! what a strikeforce that would have been. didnt newcastle have this partnership when they finished 3rd or 4th that year before bellers sen them text to shearer they worked brillianly as a partnership :brfc:
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
tcj_jones Posted October 11, 2007 Posted October 11, 2007 Although Shearer was nearing the end of his career and they had a very low opinion of each other. If both were playing together in their prime, they'd be unstoppable!
Tim Southampton Rover Posted October 11, 2007 Posted October 11, 2007 I can't believe you have all left out Patrick Valéry.
ihateburnley Posted October 11, 2007 Posted October 11, 2007 Fettis Kenna Peacock Dailly Harkness Johnson Ferguson Baggio Grabbi Ward Davies Manager: B Kidd But we can dream.....
Saltysellars Posted October 12, 2007 Posted October 12, 2007 To be honest I don't think that is too tough a call. Friedel every time. Not that I'm knocking Flowers, I just think that there's a difference between a good keeper and a great keeper. Correct IMO. Don't forget that Flowers for the vast majority of his time at Ewood was playing behind one of the best defences we've ever seen. I'm not knocking him ( Newcastle at home 14/05/1995), but Brad has played behind some weaker defences and has still been brilliant. Brad wins for me
McClarky Posted October 12, 2007 Posted October 12, 2007 Friedle Berg LeSaux Hendry Nelson Bentley Tugay Sherwood Duff Shearer Bellamy
sharptommy Posted October 12, 2007 Posted October 12, 2007 Shearer Cole Duff Tugay Sherwood Ripley Le Saux Hendry Samba Berg Friedel Dalglish Manager and the worst... Grabbi Ward De Pedro Marcolin Baggio Donis Harkness Johansson Taylor Valery Fettis Kidd "Manager"
LeftWinger Posted October 12, 2007 Posted October 12, 2007 Mine would be: Friedel Berg Hendry Samba LeSaux Ripley Tugay Dunn Duff Shearer Bellamy SUBS: Flowers Nelsen Sherwood Sutton Bohinen
thenodrog Posted October 12, 2007 Posted October 12, 2007 Too many people are picking their best 11 players and not the best team. Which one is the objective?
LWX Posted October 13, 2007 Posted October 13, 2007 Too many people are picking their best 11 players and not the best team. Which one is the objective? best team? im not so sure, but i actually think that this side was one of the most entertaining...... freidel neill berg short/taylor bjornebye/johansson dunn/gillespie flitcroft/dunn tugay duff jansen cole
ihateburnley Posted October 14, 2007 Posted October 14, 2007 best team? im not so sure, but i actually think that this side was one of the most entertaining...... freidel neill berg short/taylor bjornebye/johansson dunn/gillespie flitcroft/dunn tugay duff jansen cole Agreed. A couple of seasons before that aswell we had the likes of Berkovic who could be a joy to watch.
ABBEY Posted October 14, 2007 Posted October 14, 2007 id just pick the champ squad........easy champions of england cant beat that team.
Roar of the Rover Posted October 14, 2007 Posted October 14, 2007 Friedel Niell Hendry Nelsen Le Saux Ripley/Bentley Tugay Sherwood Duff/Wilcox Shearer Gallagher
S15 Posted October 15, 2007 Posted October 15, 2007 Anyone putting people like Samba in are living a dream. You can only be truely considered a great by playing at a high level over a sustained period of time or by being just truely world class (ala Duff) On that basis the only players who could be considered from the current squad would be Friedel and Tugay. If Nelsen, Samba or MGP (Who to even consider is an insult to true legends Duff and Wilcox) what would they be remembered for, really?? Nelsen had been injured for at least a third of his time here, and Samba has been here 9 months and played in a team that finished 10th. Not disputing (On Nelsens part anyway) that these are good players, but in Rovers best ever Premier League team, a competition WE HAVE WON, is just crazy.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.