thenodrog Posted May 10, 2012 Author Posted May 10, 2012 I would imagine he can't be named because he's due to appear in another trial in the near future. Some might suggest that that's all the more reason then.
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
colin Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 Thank goodness that Harold Shipman wasn't called Mohammed Shipman. Just imagine the s41t storm that would have erupted on here.
Paul Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 You see scum. I see our new management team. WOW! How have you got away with that one?
thenodrog Posted May 11, 2012 Author Posted May 11, 2012 WOW! How have you got away with that one? Maybe cos nobody has seen fit to draw the gaze of moderation toward it. BUT... It's called humour Paul. Not massively funny but the intention was there. This is why you weren't a natural choice to moderate. I'm interested to know what you find most to object about? The fact that the club is being raped by a bunch of scummy wrong un's from the Indian sub-continent? Or the fact that any new recruits to the management team will likely be of similar appearence?
Paul Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 Venkys are loathsome but organised child abusers ? Not like you to trivialise this subject Matt ? Maybe cos nobody has seen fit to draw the gaze of moderation toward it. BUT... It's called humour Paul. Not massively funny but the intention was there. Please see above - without wishing to draw adopted into this This is why you weren't a natural choice to moderate. Fine, if you say so, your entitled to an opinion I'm interested to know what you find most to object about? The fact that the club is being raped by a bunch of scummy wrong un's from the Indian sub-continent? Or the fact that any new recruits to the management team will likely be of similar appearence? I haven't objected to anything in this thread, I was simply surprised the remark hadn't been moderated. Clearly I object to the owners and have, like yourself, since day one. The appearance of the management team is of no concern to me, presuming you mean the physical characteristics or ethnic origin. What concerns me is the person(s) competence. As to date all those connected to the Raos have demonstrated a complete lack of competence I would object strongly to the individual if this was the case. The other thing I object to is the constant reference to any individual as scum. It is objectionable to me, along with many other words, though I'm not about to make a great fuss about it, but seeing as you asked I'll respond.
Rovermatt Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 WOW! How have you got away with that one? May I just point out that I made the remark on the basis that the perps were obvious scumbags rather than Asian scumbags.
thenodrog Posted May 11, 2012 Author Posted May 11, 2012 May I just point out that I made the remark on the basis that the perps were obvious scumbags rather than Asian scumbags. But in this case the perps are pervy asian scumbags. There's no hiding that and why should there be?
Rovermatt Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 But in this case the perps are pervy asian scumbags. There's no hiding that and why should there be? No but what I'm saying is that I didn't make the remark because they are Asian and our owners are Asian, rather they are scumbags and our owners are scumbags.
adopted scouser Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 No but what I'm saying is that I didn't make the remark because they are Asian and our owners are Asian, rather they are scumbags and our owners are scumbags. Of course you did !
thenodrog Posted May 11, 2012 Author Posted May 11, 2012 No but what I'm saying is that I didn't make the remark because they are Asian and our owners are Asian, rather they are scumbags and our owners are scumbags. Stop wriggling it's completely unecessary. Everybody knows full well what you meant, everybody agrees full well with you (even if some like to pretend otherwise) and nobody would ever accuse you of being a racist. You can't do with proddydogs of course which suggests that you carry a degree of bigotry but that doesn't count at all... it only counts if the object of your mistrust belongs to the world of Islam. All this fuss cos Paul doesn't do humour.
Rovermatt Posted May 11, 2012 Posted May 11, 2012 Proddydogs? I can assure you I'm not 'wriggling' however whether or not you choose to believe me is entirely your own affair. That said, I'd hazard a guess that your own fixation on 'Indopaks' colours your judgement in these things somewhat. Anyway, surely the more serious matter is the trivialising of the crime involved? For that I apologise again.
jim mk2 Posted May 12, 2012 Posted May 12, 2012 Stop wriggling it's completely unecessary. Everybody knows full well what you meant, everybody agrees full well with you (even if some like to pretend otherwise) and nobody would ever accuse you of being a racist. You can't do with proddydogs of course which suggests that you carry a degree of bigotry but that doesn't count at all... it only counts if the object of your mistrust belongs to the world of Islam. Alf at his finest.
Tyrone Shoelaces Posted May 12, 2012 Posted May 12, 2012 Alf at his finest. If the BBC ever do re-make they won't have to look far for a new scriptwriter.
SouthAussieRover Posted May 12, 2012 Posted May 12, 2012 Alf at his finest. Please stop quoting mouldy Gordon . I have him on ignore.
thenodrog Posted May 12, 2012 Author Posted May 12, 2012 No but what I'm saying is that I didn't make the remark because they are Asian and our owners are Asian, rather they are scumbags and our owners are scumbags. If you have to explain a joke it aint funny! Here try this........ A muslim was shot today by a starting pistol..... Police are convinced that it's race related! Matt when you have a minute please could you explain it to Paul. Please stop quoting mouldy Gordon . I have him on ignore. I do so wish that was true.
SouthAussieRover Posted May 12, 2012 Posted May 12, 2012 If you have to explain a joke it aint funny! Here try this........ A muslim was shot today by a starting pistol..... Police are convinced that it's race related! Matt when you have a minute please could you explain it to Paul. I do so wish that was true. As true as a phoenix rising from the ashes cock.
Rovermatt Posted May 12, 2012 Posted May 12, 2012 If you have to explain a joke it aint funny! Bet you laughed though. If you have to explain a joke it aint funny! Here try this........ A muslim was shot today by a starting pistol..... Police are convinced that it's race related! Amusing no doubt. You'd be the first to point out of course that Muslims aren't a race.
thenodrog Posted May 12, 2012 Author Posted May 12, 2012 Bet you laughed though. Amusing no doubt. You'd be the first to point out of course that Muslims aren't a race. I'd be the first to point out that I'm not a Policeman either.
thenodrog Posted August 17, 2012 Author Posted August 17, 2012 I see the Moors Murderers and the wherabouts of Keith Bennetts body has reared it's ugly head again. God only knows why once guilt had been fully and unequivocably established that the truth wasn't forced out of him or Hindley by any available method years ago. The law should be able to offer closure to Keiths family by whatever means necessary. Sodium thiopental / lie detector tests escalating through to mental or physical torture It surely wouldn't have been at all difficult.
roverandout Posted August 17, 2012 Posted August 17, 2012 i think they should let sleeping dogs lie, no point in dredging up more pain for his family, i am not being funny but after all these years will there be much left of keith's body after all these years? i know people need closure but seems a bit inappropiate
ultrablue Posted August 17, 2012 Posted August 17, 2012 i think they should let sleeping dogs lie, no point in dredging up more pain for his family, i am not being funny but after all these years will there be much left of keith's body after all these years? i know people need closure but seems a bit inappropiate i think they should let sleeping dogs lie, no point in dredging up more pain for his family, i am not being funny but after all these years will there be much left of keith's body after all these years? i know people need closure but seems a bit inappropiate It's like reading Letterbox in Viz. Hilariously misjudged post.
Steve Moss Posted August 17, 2012 Posted August 17, 2012 So far as I'm concerned once a person becomes a convicted murderer he's little better than an animal and forfeits his human rights.
Tyrone Shoelaces Posted August 17, 2012 Posted August 17, 2012 So far as I'm concerned once a person becomes a convicted murderer he's little better than an animal and forfeits his human rights. I once had a workmate who thought just like you. Until his son murdered his own grandmother over some stupid argument. My workmate wasn't quite so " hang 'em and flog "em " after that.
Salgado Is A Hero Posted August 17, 2012 Posted August 17, 2012 i think they should let sleeping dogs lie, no point in dredging up more pain for his family, i am not being funny but after all these years will there be much left of keith's body after all these years? i know people need closure but seems a bit inappropiate His Mum is dying of cancer and all she wants is to give him a proper burial.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.