Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

[Archived] Hang Em High


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Thank goodness that Harold Shipman wasn't called Mohammed Shipman.

Just imagine the s41t storm that would have erupted on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WOW! How have you got away with that one?

Maybe cos nobody has seen fit to draw the gaze of moderation toward it.

BUT... It's called humour Paul. Not massively funny but the intention was there.

This is why you weren't a natural choice to moderate. I'm interested to know what you find most to object about? The fact that the club is being raped by a bunch of scummy wrong un's from the Indian sub-continent? Or the fact that any new recruits to the management team will likely be of similar appearence?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Venkys are loathsome but organised child abusers ? Not like you to trivialise this subject Matt ?

Maybe cos nobody has seen fit to draw the gaze of moderation toward it.

BUT... It's called humour Paul. Not massively funny but the intention was there.

Please see above - without wishing to draw adopted into this

This is why you weren't a natural choice to moderate.

Fine, if you say so, your entitled to an opinion

I'm interested to know what you find most to object about? The fact that the club is being raped by a bunch of scummy wrong un's from the Indian sub-continent? Or the fact that any new recruits to the management team will likely be of similar appearence?

I haven't objected to anything in this thread, I was simply surprised the remark hadn't been moderated. Clearly I object to the owners and have, like yourself, since day one. The appearance of the management team is of no concern to me, presuming you mean the physical characteristics or ethnic origin. What concerns me is the person(s) competence. As to date all those connected to the Raos have demonstrated a complete lack of competence I would object strongly to the individual if this was the case.

The other thing I object to is the constant reference to any individual as scum. It is objectionable to me, along with many other words, though I'm not about to make a great fuss about it, but seeing as you asked I'll respond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May I just point out that I made the remark on the basis that the perps were obvious scumbags rather than Asian scumbags.

But in this case the perps are pervy asian scumbags. There's no hiding that and why should there be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But in this case the perps are pervy asian scumbags. There's no hiding that and why should there be?

No but what I'm saying is that I didn't make the remark because they are Asian and our owners are Asian, rather they are scumbags and our owners are scumbags.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No but what I'm saying is that I didn't make the remark because they are Asian and our owners are Asian, rather they are scumbags and our owners are scumbags.

Stop wriggling it's completely unecessary. Everybody knows full well what you meant, everybody agrees full well with you (even if some like to pretend otherwise) and nobody would ever accuse you of being a racist. You can't do with proddydogs of course which suggests that you carry a degree of bigotry but that doesn't count at all... it only counts if the object of your mistrust belongs to the world of Islam.

All this fuss cos Paul doesn't do humour. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Proddydogs?

I can assure you I'm not 'wriggling' however whether or not you choose to believe me is entirely your own affair. That said, I'd hazard a guess that your own fixation on 'Indopaks' colours your judgement in these things somewhat.

Anyway, surely the more serious matter is the trivialising of the crime involved? For that I apologise again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop wriggling it's completely unecessary. Everybody knows full well what you meant, everybody agrees full well with you (even if some like to pretend otherwise) and nobody would ever accuse you of being a racist. You can't do with proddydogs of course which suggests that you carry a degree of bigotry but that doesn't count at all... it only counts if the object of your mistrust belongs to the world of Islam.

Alf at his finest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No but what I'm saying is that I didn't make the remark because they are Asian and our owners are Asian, rather they are scumbags and our owners are scumbags.

If you have to explain a joke it aint funny!

Here try this........

A muslim was shot today by a starting pistol..... Police are convinced that it's race related!

Matt when you have a minute please could you explain it to Paul. ^_^

Please stop quoting mouldy Gordon .

I have him on ignore.

I do so wish that was true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have to explain a joke it aint funny!

Here try this........

A muslim was shot today by a starting pistol..... Police are convinced that it's race related!

Matt when you have a minute please could you explain it to Paul. ^_^

I do so wish that was true.

As true as a phoenix rising from the ashes cock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have to explain a joke it aint funny!

Bet you laughed though.

If you have to explain a joke it aint funny!

Here try this........

A muslim was shot today by a starting pistol..... Police are convinced that it's race related!

Amusing no doubt.

You'd be the first to point out of course that Muslims aren't a race.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I see the Moors Murderers and the wherabouts of Keith Bennetts body has reared it's ugly head again. God only knows why once guilt had been fully and unequivocably established that the truth wasn't forced out of him or Hindley by any available method years ago. The law should be able to offer closure to Keiths family by whatever means necessary. Sodium thiopental / lie detector tests escalating through to mental or physical torture It surely wouldn't have been at all difficult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think they should let sleeping dogs lie, no point in dredging up more pain for his family, i am not being funny but after all these years will there be much left of keith's body after all these years? i know people need closure but seems a bit inappropiate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think they should let sleeping dogs lie, no point in dredging up more pain for his family, i am not being funny but after all these years will there be much left of keith's body after all these years? i know people need closure but seems a bit inappropiate

i think they should let sleeping dogs lie, no point in dredging up more pain for his family, i am not being funny but after all these years will there be much left of keith's body after all these years? i know people need closure but seems a bit inappropiate

It's like reading Letterbox in Viz. Hilariously misjudged post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far as I'm concerned once a person becomes a convicted murderer he's little better than an animal and forfeits his human rights.

I once had a workmate who thought just like you. Until his son murdered his own grandmother over some stupid argument. My workmate wasn't quite so " hang 'em and flog "em " after that.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think they should let sleeping dogs lie, no point in dredging up more pain for his family, i am not being funny but after all these years will there be much left of keith's body after all these years? i know people need closure but seems a bit inappropiate

His Mum is dying of cancer and all she wants is to give him a proper burial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.