AussieinUk Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 Nicko - Is the news of Fowler rejecting the offer, now the end of the matter?
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
broadsword Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 Today's Rovers story, via the BBC: Stoke and Blackburn lead the contenders for Lens midfielder Kanga Akale. (Daily Mail) Wikipedia says he's a pacey winger/forward with 33 caps for the Ivory Coast, and is either currently or formerly on loan at Marseille. Anyone know if he's definitely right footed? Makes sense to sign him, we've just signed a 'Roo after all ...
Rover down South Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 Today's Rovers story, via the BBC: Stoke and Blackburn lead the contenders for Lens midfielder Kanga Akale. (Daily Mail) Wikipedia says he's a pacey winger/forward with 33 caps for the Ivory Coast, and is either currently or formerly on loan at Marseille. Anyone know if he's definitely right footed? He is signing for Stoke on a year long loan apparently. This could be good news: http://www.sportinglife.com/football/news/...ual_075716.html
Bobby G Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 Confirmed with a French league friend of mine that Akale is a right winger, nothing spectacular but just decent. Pacy, but Marseille wont give him away as he has recently signed a new contract according to him...
nicko Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 AKALE - Nonsense. FOWLER - Heard he was unhappy with the pay-as-you-play deal, so it may be that he goes. Mind you, the manager has been pushing for him to stay. So this is probably not dead yet. I wonder if there was a trade within the club - 'you can have Andrews or Fowler but not both'?...makes you think.
rovers1995 Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 nicko is it right that rovers are interested in SWP
nicko Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 nicko is it right that rovers are interested in SWP Not at £9 million.
rovers1995 Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 ok there was a story in the mirror today saying that we have signed grella and andrews for £5million is it true. I didn't know we had signed andrews
Billy Castell Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 Nicko: SSN have just said something about Heskey being linked to Spuds. Is there any milage in this? And secondly are there any names other than Pennant that are being linked to the RW position?
nicko Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 ok there was a story in the mirror today saying that we have signed grella and andrews for £5million is it true. I didn't know we had signed andrews You will.
AussieinUk Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 You will. So we did get Andrew's for under a £1m?
JohnS Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 Nicko do we actually have £9Million? Or is it we don't value players highly. We need a right winger but we don't want to pay for Pennant, or the likes of SWP or Milner.
3rdpillar Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 SWP is not worth £9m IMO. For every pass he receives he wastes most in a frustrating way. Poor ball or worst still, selfish dribble to nowhere. For what? Ocationally very good goal or a well times pass inside. SWP need lots of service to deliver. We dont have that luxury in the PREM. Besides we will ahve other players on the park who can do good things with the ball.
socngill Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 Nicko do we actually have £9Million? Or is it we don't value players highly. We need a right winger but we don't want to pay for Pennant, or the likes of SWP or Milner. I think it's more not wanting to pay over the odds for a player. Neither Milner or Pennant are worth £9m. Pennant is worth about £3.5m and Milner maybe £5-6m. Not sure if the club would pay £9-10m for SWP, I would say he is worth about £7-8m. The thing is the club won't be held over a barrel for any player - and I'm glad that this is the case.
Bobby G Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 SWP is better than Pennant for sure, and he has done more to justify any hype around him than Lennon. Now if it comes down to Joaquin or SWP, I am not sure who I would take. Joaquin is definitely the BETTER player, BUT the risk of adjusting to English football would exist so it may be better to go for the "safer" option.
JohnS Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 I think it's more not wanting to pay over the odds for a player. Neither Milner or Pennant are worth £9m. Pennant is worth about £3.5m and Milner maybe £5-6m. Not sure if the club would pay £9-10m for SWP, I would say he is worth about £7-8m. The thing is the club won't be held over a barrel for any player - and I'm glad that this is the case. I understand that, but my point is simple we can't demand over the odd's for our players and then try and get some players on the cheap. We need a quality RW, SWP/Milner/Pennant are better than what we have. I'm not saying break the bank or anything, lets spend the money we have. I know were doing ok in the league at the moment, but we lose a few theres pressure on Ince.
dannyboy1206 Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 Not at £9 million. Why is that have rovers not got that sort of money
novella Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 Why is that have rovers not got that sort of money Think we have the money, just is SWP really worth 9m when Jaoquin is avaiable at 9.5 etc. lots of decision to make
misterbigalow Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 Was playing FIFA 08 last night, and Joaquin is worth a staggering £25 million on there, ha! Anyway, if Fowler doesn't sign, why was he put in the team photo? If he doesn't sign, the photo will be spoilt with his ugly non-Blackburn player mug (even though it is already anyway, ha!)
nicko Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 On Grella + Andrews = £5 million. Grella is around £4 million and Andrews [with bits] will be around £1 million.
JohnS Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 Nicko do you believe with Grella and Andrews in, that the summer shopping for us is done.
bats Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 Nicko, can you confirm rovers are still interested in Joaquin and if not which other right wingers are they looking at?
Ronin Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 Anyway, if Fowler doesn't sign, why was he put in the team photo? If he doesn't sign, the photo will be spoilt with his ugly non-Blackburn player mug (even though it is already anyway, ha!) Could just photoshop King Carlos over Fowler, although they'd have to make sure it looks better than his profile pic.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.