CrazyIvan Posted October 7, 2008 Posted October 7, 2008 I agree with Tris, Parsonblue and gumboots. I'm not blindly supporting Ince but I'm certainly not prepared to read some of the vitriol heaped on Ince on here without comment. I wasn't impressed with the team performance on Saturday, something I've said elsewhere, but neither was it the total and abject capitulation some are indicating. United were brilliant, that was acknowledged by many people on Saturday evening and on Sunday in the papers. The fact that some people just decide to beat Ince with any stick they can (Carlos story in the Mail for example, Andrews signing when he's turned out to be decent enough, Brad leaving, Bentley leaving, I could go on...) gets my back up because it just goes against the idea of fair play and giving someone a chance. I think a fair few of us are asking people on here to give Ince a chance before writing him off or just using anything to attack his credibility.
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
mhead Posted October 7, 2008 Posted October 7, 2008 Europe under Hughes...and all I can think about is how badly they were set up for Larissa. Coventry in the Cup...an absolute disgrace. After those the Scum defeat at home looks tame. Beat Bolton and Bring back the Drummers!
thenodrog Posted October 7, 2008 Posted October 7, 2008 Oh and by the way, name me a team, any team that doesn't close down or tackle. Spurs................ Oh! and Newcastle.
jim mk2 Posted October 7, 2008 Posted October 7, 2008 92er said it, - last Saturday's performance against Man Utd was the worst he'd [and me] seen since Utd scored 5 second half goals against us at Ewood in the sixties. ? Watched that match from the old Riverside Stand and it still haunts me to this day. United and Denis law in particular were brilliant. I don't think Rovers were quite as bad on Saturday but United were almost as good as that 1966 team. Hope it's not an omen but if my old memory serves correctly Rovers were relegated that season.
ABBEY Posted October 8, 2008 Posted October 8, 2008 I was working with a real life red manc,gobsmacked comes to mind i know.His view was that we played dead and we let utd win and we were gutless.He also said he had never seen a rovers team like that in all our top flight days.
tonyoz Posted October 8, 2008 Posted October 8, 2008 I was working with a real life red manc,gobsmacked comes to mind i know.His view was that we played dead and we let utd win and we were gutless.He also said he had never seen a rovers team like that in all our top flight days. I don't suppose he was trying to wind you up by any chance?
Backroom trueblue Posted October 8, 2008 Backroom Posted October 8, 2008 I was working with a real life red manc,gobsmacked comes to mind i know. WOW! Abbs... I hope you framed him quick and stuck him on your wall ... He'll be worth a fortune being the only one in existance !!!!!!
ABBEY Posted October 8, 2008 Posted October 8, 2008 jeesus wept...we were chatting about the game and NO he wasnt trying to wind me ....
Head Rover Heels Posted October 8, 2008 Posted October 8, 2008 I was working with a real life red manc,gobsmacked comes to mind i know.His view was that we played dead and we let utd win and we were gutless.He also said he had never seen a rovers team like that in all our top flight days.Watched it wh a table full of them (all in exile down here, so on the telly - obviously) but general concensus was that considering we had a severely weakened team (ie, two full backs and a 40 year old in midfield), there was no shame in the result. We had a few lucky escapes, but also made some half decent chances which is more than many other teams do against that lot. We've played better, we've played much much worse, but a 2-0 defeat considering a perfectly timed dubious goal (perfect as far as motivation killing goes) wasn't exactly embarrasing. I agree that we need more in future, but the amount of games where that cannot be said under any manager for any club, are few and far between. If we want to get technical, i'd (and my table of companions hinted at) give us a C+ for that - Must try harder, but there is quality and a decent side bubbling under the surface here - Given time i'm positive about the chances of us seeing that under the current manager.
92er Posted October 8, 2008 Posted October 8, 2008 Watched that match from the old Riverside Stand and it still haunts me to this day. United and Denis law in particular were brilliant. I don't think Rovers were quite as bad on Saturday but United were almost as good as that 1966 team. Hope it's not an omen but if my old memory serves correctly Rovers were relegated that season. I was on the Riverside, but not in the stand! It was 1965 and we were relegated the following season. We played them towards the end of the season, with our first Australian international keeper playing for us. We lost about 1-4 and I didn't go.
den Posted October 8, 2008 Posted October 8, 2008 I was on the Riverside, but not in the stand! It was 1965 and we were relegated the following season. We played them towards the end of the season, with our first Australian international keeper playing for us. We lost about 1-4 and I didn't go. I was on the riverside as well, third post along, as always. The goalkeeper you mention would be John Roberts.
92er Posted October 8, 2008 Posted October 8, 2008 The goalkeeper you mention would be John Roberts. Indeed he was.
brfcs5359 Posted October 8, 2008 Posted October 8, 2008 I have watched the game again on Sultana. It's rubbish to say we didn't try. Ronaldo had a shocker against Ooijar. Andrews pass to Roberts in the last moments was a killer pass fit to win any game, absolute class. Took Vidic AND Ferdinand out in one ball. Emerton ran more than any Utd player and Warnock's tackling and passing was awesome to say were playing the so called European Champions. United got on top of us (because we had passengers and they didn't) and we weren't prepared to get stuck in and break bones (like under Hughes). Trying to be organised, keep and pass the ball may have been the wrong tactic against Utd but AT LEAST Ince was brave enough. Adopting this policy in time will reap rewards in confidence and experience. What do Rovers and Mokeona leanr kickig lumps out of Scholes? I'll give you the answer. A Premier League team lacking in skill and finesse, one unable to qualify for Europe every season and who regularly flounder, Coventry, Larrissa, Wigan, Birmingham and who stutter regularly (like all home games last season) Good to see some perspective. Ince in first 8 games is doing better than Hughes. So stop moaning and start singing!
thenodrog Posted October 8, 2008 Posted October 8, 2008 I was on the Riverside, but not in the stand! It was 1965 and we were relegated the following season. We played them towards the end of the season, with our first Australian international keeper playing for us. We lost about 1-4 and I didn't go. Can't be bothered checking but I thought it was 0-4. We lost 1-4 at home to Lpool same season too I think. (Harrison Pen)
BuckyRover Posted October 8, 2008 Posted October 8, 2008 I have watched the game again on Sultana. It's rubbish to say we didn't try. Ronaldo had a shocker against Ooijar. Andrews pass to Roberts in the last moments was a killer pass fit to win any game, absolute class. Took Vidic AND Ferdinand out in one ball. Emerton ran more than any Utd player and Warnock's tackling and passing was awesome to say were playing the so called European Champions. United got on top of us (because we had passengers and they didn't) and we weren't prepared to get stuck in and break bones (like under Hughes). Trying to be organised, keep and pass the ball may have been the wrong tactic against Utd but AT LEAST Ince was brave enough. Adopting this policy in time will reap rewards in confidence and experience. What do Rovers and Mokeona leanr kickig lumps out of Scholes? I'll give you the answer. A Premier League team lacking in skill and finesse, one unable to qualify for Europe every season and who regularly flounder, Coventry, Larrissa, Wigan, Birmingham and who stutter regularly (like all home games last season) Good to see some perspective. Ince in first 8 games is doing better than Hughes. So stop moaning and start singing! Those are my thoughts also. The fact that this time it didn't work against Man Utd is a bad thing. But if we continue to try and play the way Ince wants the play, against most Premiership teams we should prosper. We are trying to play football the "right" way and in the end we will be loved for it.
gumboots Posted October 8, 2008 Posted October 8, 2008 and in the end we will be loved for it. Think that bit is highly unlikely. Only Rovers fans love Rovers. The media never will. However, we might be respected.
RoverJoexx Posted October 8, 2008 Posted October 8, 2008 The best way to analysis it for me is for years we try to bring those top 4 clubs down to 'our' level to compete while this time we tried to match them at theirs. Madness? yes. Right direction? yes Some will be surprise to see how many yellows we accumulated against utd and gunners as compared to last time. The result is disappointing I agree, but the performance is no where gutless. Not first half and second before the 2nd goal went in. The team chased every ball and closed them down as much as possible even at the front which almost got us rewards during first half. Some heads went down after that second goal went in which I hate to see and don't want to point out but hope I won't see them next game. Harsh weather as it drains their energy even more and the lost of our talisman at the start of second half didn't help our cause also. But I think the approach to our games under Ince is one thing some need accustom to as we are now setup to 'play' football and not 'kick' football.
CrazyIvan Posted October 8, 2008 Posted October 8, 2008 I thought that Andrews pass after robbing the two United players was superb. A mark of how good Andrews may turn out to be...
Tyrone Shoelaces Posted October 8, 2008 Posted October 8, 2008 It'll be interesting to see which style we adopt for our visit to Bolton, it's either kill or be killed there. Let's hope heads don't drop again.
thenodrog Posted October 8, 2008 Posted October 8, 2008 We are trying to play football the "right" way and in the end we will be loved for it. Thats rubbish if it means we are relegated for it too.
CAPT KAYOS Posted October 9, 2008 Posted October 9, 2008 Emerton ran more than any Utd player Trying to be organised, keep and pass the ball may have been the wrong tactic against Utd but AT LEAST Ince was brave enough. He certainly did - running after the ball but not getting anywhere near a UTD player or the ball - what's the point? -didn't do anything of worthy note during the game like nearly all the team. Its the wrong tactic regardless of who you are playing if you don't progress or do anything with the ball, and what happens when you don't have the ball - exactly what we all so on Saturday and would have if we had been playing Hull/ Stoke /Citeh / Bolton or anybody. What people are missing is we have seen this last season when Ince was not here - questions have to be asked about the players in all this also - and we know which ones they are.
Majiball Posted October 9, 2008 Posted October 9, 2008 Thats rubbish if it means we are relegated for it too. Ipswich, Reading & Norwich spring to mind I'd like to see the two combined, but the fitness levels required maybe beyond us.
den Posted October 9, 2008 Posted October 9, 2008 Those are my thoughts also. The fact that this time it didn't work against Man Utd is a bad thing. But if we continue to try and play the way Ince wants the play, against most Premiership teams we should prosper. We are trying to play football the "right" way and in the end we will be loved for it. To make these comments in the Man Utd post match chat is completely misleading. There was NOTHING "positive", or "attacking" or "right" about rovers tactics or performance on Saturday. Other games maybe, but not this one. One man up, with the rest 20 or 30 yards behind, no pressure on their back four or midfield is purely defensive stuff. No defending from the front or wingers/full backs forcing their full backs to defend. Call Hughes for playing boring football if you like, but it was never as accepting of defeat as this was. Hopefully it was a one-off.
brfcs5359 Posted October 9, 2008 Posted October 9, 2008 To make these comments in the Man Utd post match chat is completely misleading. There was NOTHING "positive", or "attacking" or "right" about rovers tactics or performance on Saturday. Other games maybe, but not this one. One man up, with the rest 20 or 30 yards behind, no pressure on their back four or midfield is purely defensive stuff. No defending from the front or wingers/full backs forcing their full backs to defend. Call Hughes for playing boring football if you like, but it was never as accepting of defeat as this was. Hopefully it was a one-off. Thats rubbish. Andrews high up robbing two united players and playing a killer pass - watch it again! Warnock when he robbed utd up the field, fed RSC pushed up to receive the feedback ahead of utds midfield and pushing the return into the path of Cruz whose shot at the near post was saved. Or the ball that fed Derbyshire. Those three incidents lone were at the beginning middle and end and all could have resulted in goals playing good football. You're talking rubbish. Sorry. You must not have been at the game (or camped down in the bar drowning the Paul Ince blues). I thought that Andrews pass after robbing the two United players was superb. A mark of how good Andrews may turn out to be... And how many people on here said he was rubbish when he came on!!! I agree with CrazyIvan. the critics....Laughable. Specsavers - 2 for 1 is all I can say. Like BBB (Bold Blind B*stard) Bennett, you're as laughable as him. And like him you might watch the vid again but decide not to come out and say sorry! Andrews did ok. When you play the European Champions you're going to be doing a lot of backing off, defending, back peddling, put under pressure. That's why Rovers didn't attack as much as we would all like. Stop using the Utd game as an opportunity to bash Ince! Support the Rovers!
ABBEY Posted October 9, 2008 Posted October 9, 2008 We are trying to play football the "right" way and in the end we will be loved for it. is this a joke or just another deluded thought? We won the league playing amazing football and alls we got was ripped. 1.itv news did a piece on us winning the title and they had playing in the background cash till registars and pink floyds "money". 2.we were nicknamed "cashburn rovers" 3.the papers reported us as not winning the league but utd losing it. 3.we didnt win the league we "bought" it. 4.everyone involved in media,perhaps not everyone but 90%, hated us for beating utd to the post. the only people happy for us were the abu fans and thats all.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.