Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

[Archived] Paul Ince


Paul Ince ?  

476 members have voted

  1. 1. you decide!

    • Back
      102
    • Sack
      352


Recommended Posts

To be fair the point about playing youngsters is a good one Den. Hughes never seemed willing to give any of the youngsters a chance at all, but Ince gave Olsson a try and, while he certainly isn't the finished article, he seems to be one for the future. He also had the balls to play Treacy rather than Pedersen when our Norwegian pop star was jogging around in front of the Riverside looking lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
i am shoked Williams has not sacked him yet. He needs to go now Williams cmon wake up and save our club. I have backed Ince all the way, but he has had enough chances now and he needs P45 TODAY WILLIAMS

But he can't can he! Ince will go there and then, but what will his team do? Who will replace him? we cannot be left in a situation where we loss all our first team coaches, who would take training? Mathias or Knox as caretaker, I'd rather keep Ince, sort out who's coming in on the hush over the next week or so and then do it with then new man ready to come in. Getting rid is the right thing to do but it must be on terms that do not put us further in the pooh.

You could however sack the lot and get Parkes back why he was allowed to leave I'll never know just shows there is no loyalty in the game anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair the point about playing youngsters is a good one Den. Hughes never seemed willing to give any of the youngsters a chance at all, but Ince gave Olsson a try and, while he certainly isn't the finished article, he seems to be one for the future. He also had the balls to play Treacy rather than Pedersen when our Norwegian pop star was jogging around in front of the Riverside looking lost.

Hughes had these same youngsters and knew they weren't the answer, ADB. Not yet anyhow. We can all ask the coaches who the best youngsters are, and throw them in. A good manager will know when they're ready though.

That's the difference, Hughes recognised a player when he saw one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should warn them - there is a trade descriptions act you know.

Fowler to Grimsby ? That says it all ...hope he persuades one or two of Ince's fantastic selection of invincibles go with him to Cleethorpes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But he can't can he! Ince will go there and then, but what will his team do? Who will replace him? we cannot be left in a situation where we loss all our first team coaches, who would take training? Mathias or Knox as caretaker, I'd rather keep Ince, sort out who's coming in on the hush over the next week or so and then do it with then new man ready to come in. Getting rid is the right thing to do but it must be on terms that do not put us further in the pooh.

You could however sack the lot and get Parkes back why he was allowed to leave I'll never know just shows there is no loyalty in the game anymore.

I hope williams has been thinking of getting rid of Ince a long time ago, not just today. He needs to go now and give as much time for the new manager to help Rovers get help of this mess we are in now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something to remember Ince whilst your not 'feeling the pressure':

Our record: Played 15 games, lost 8, drawn 4 and won 3.

We have conceeded 28 goals in 15 Premier League games?

We have now gone 2 complete months without winning in the Premier League...

We have won a single home league game out of 7 played at Ewood this season!?

But hey, give him 3 more games against Liverpool, Wigan and Stoke. With our goals conceeded record, im sure we could get a draw against Liverpool and im sure we could get the winable results against Wigan and Stoke... :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted sack. I have stuck up for him initially, as I believe people should be given a chance, and this risky appointment may have came off. However, he has proven to be incapable of even giving us a solid start with hope for the rest of the season. The morale is rock bottom and people are already looking at how to cope with relegation.

I know I have fought with JAL, Gordon and Jan, but I shall join in with their calls to sack the manager.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hughes bought these youngsters, so he must have rated them and thought they were the answer!

Which youngsters? He bought Olssen yes, but the others?

Anyway Modes, my point is that these youngsters weren't the answer then and they're not the answer now. So what's positive about playing them when they're not ready?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which youngsters? He bought Olssen yes, but the others?

Anyway Modes, my point is that these youngsters weren't the answer then and they're not the answer now. So what's positive about playing them when they're not ready?

Imo thats not the issue here Den

To me they are ready (maybe not Treacy who I don't think is good enough anyway) but the team is not - its a common factor not to introduce youngsters when things are not going good but gradually when most things are ok.

As we all know though, the situation has been far from ideal and is a tad unfair to call them when the more established players have not been performing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Announcements

  • You can now add BlueSky, Mastodon and X accounts to your BRFCS Profile.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.