Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

[Archived] Paul Ince Gone


Back or Sack  

557 members have voted

  1. 1. Which?

    • Back
      44
    • Sack
      514


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Anyone know if he has even bothered to start his coaching badges yet?

If he actually did them I would have more respect for this poor excuse for a manager.

When I suggested that he suffered learning difficulties I was attacked by many. Nothing has as yet convinced me otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I suggested that he suffered learning difficulties I was attacked by many. Nothing has as yet convinced me otherwise.

That's because of the way you went about it (as usual). There's no particular evidence one way or the other unless someone has personal knowledge of his school record...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see oxygen in the air but I know it's there.

Yeah, that's a great parallel, because you breathe proves oxygen is in the air and because you think someone might possibly have a learning difficulty makes it so... Only mildly arrogant... :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plenty on here argued that Ince didn't sell DB, didn't they?

Anyway, why didn't Ince wait until he had actually taken the job and discussed the situation with Bentley, before he decided to sell? I mean - how could he have known about DB's attitude before he got the managers job? Just another load of cobblers from PI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plenty on here argued that Ince didn't sell DB, didn't they?

Anyway, why didn't Ince wait until he had actually taken the job and discussed the situation with Bentley, before he decided to sell? I mean - how could he have known about DB's attitude before he got the managers job? Just another load of cobblers from PI.

I think the key point in that article is that he was asked the question in the interview, and then they gave him the job. In other words, it was the answer the club wanted to hear!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the key point in that article is that he was asked the question in the interview, and then they gave him the job. In other words, it was the answer the club wanted to hear!

That's more like what you want to believe EIT. JW would have told Ince and the other interviewees that Bentley would be sold, if that was the case.

After all, Hughes wasn't going to sell him, was he.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's right. I completely forgot what a great attitude Ince had as a player. Pot and kettle for me.

I actually think his article is bob on though. IF Bentley had stayed he might have just grown up enough for it to make the difference. Might not though! Oh well - another wasted English talent in my book who'll never get back to top form..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As it now appears our owners have adopted a 'sell to survive' policy each summer, isn't it probably that anyone who answered "no" to that question was immediately ruled out from getting the job?

Would go some way to explaining how that cretin ended up here in the first place.

Good point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's made a start but he's broken his red crayon and is waiting for a new one before he can finish colouring.

Clearly he hasn't had the finances or the support of the board and the fans. Upon breaking his crayon, they should have supplied him with a top quality replacement, yet he is still waiting. Unbelievable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's more like what you want to believe EIT. JW would have told Ince and the other interviewees that Bentley would be sold, if that was the case.

After all, Hughes wasn't going to sell him, was he.

Hughes wasn't there.

And it seems you are the one believing what you want to believe. Le Chuck's post is far more plausible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a really interesting article actually. Fair play, we gave Ince a lot of stick, but we didn't know what exactly was going on behind the scenes. A few of my friends - Arsenal fans - have commented that he had a poor attitude while he was with them. I never saw it under Hughes, but I believe what Ince says is the truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hughes wasn't there.

And it seems you are the one believing what you want to believe. Le Chuck's post is far more plausible

"Perhaps I should have done what Mark Hughes had tried to do and convince David that another season playing with Blackburn, turning in star performances, was what his career needed most."

There's nothing plausible about believing that the job offer was dependant on the new man wanting to sell Bentley. That's a ridiculous suggestion. JW said at the time that no-one had to sell David Bentley. You want to believe some other fairy tale?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.