Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

[Archived] Nicko's January Rumour Mill


Brownie

Recommended Posts

Sam's story at the time was that the club had no money and it didn't feel right.

The club thought they had found the new Mark Hughes.

So Allardyce did legitimately turn down the offer of the job, rather than being overlooked in favour of Paul Ince? I find that very hard to believe...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
He wasn't offered the job, he had an interview for it.

Yet to save face when he took the job in December he (and, I think, John Williams) claimed that he had been Rovers' "preferred choice" since Hughes left, but that he turned down the job in the summer as it "wasn't the right time". It's such transparent lying.

Paul Ince must feel a right plonker. Sacked, then made to look like you were never really wanted in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yet to save face when he took the job in December he (and, I think, John Williams) claimed that he had been Rovers' "preferred choice" since Hughes left, but that he turned down the job in the summer as it "wasn't the right time". It's such transparent lying.

Paul Ince must feel a right plonker. Sacked, then made to look like you were never really wanted in the first place.

The rumours I heard were that Sam was in fact on the short list, before Rovers could make a decision, they needed to know if or not Ince would be allowed to manage without his badges!!

Sam took this as Ince being offered the job and Sam withdrew, I believe that to be correct as it came from someone inside Rovers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

to be fair ince maybe had an eye for decent players, and i will always love him for getting money for friedel and signing robinson. lovely move!

Nope, retarded move. Love him for getting money for Friedel? Any team in the Prem would have given us money for Friedel. IMO, we could have easily forced double that out of Villa- they were willing to pay him more each year! Robinson still doesn't impress me enough, and is categorically no Friedel. The change of keepers was one of our biggest weakenings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

City got Bellamy, and now they have 4 very good strikers. They won't be going for Cruz. Which means we won't be able to buy a decent right winger and central midfielder. We're stuck with the fine choice between Tugay, Mokoena, Andrews and Grella (and Dunn for however many games he stays fit) for the end of the season.

Nope, retarded move. Love him for getting money for Friedel? Any team in the Prem would have given us money for Friedel. IMO, we could have easily forced double that out of Villa- they were willing to pay him more each year! Robinson still doesn't impress me enough, and is categorically no Friedel. The change of keepers was one of our biggest weakenings.

Yep.

Friedel has been our most important player for 7-8 years. And he still had at least 3 good seasons in him. The teams at the top buy players for 20mill + which they only keep for a season or two. We could have easily gotten a monstrous sum for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a thought on Roque...

Man City are the strangest club to deal with in this window.

I have had confirmed as fact that City went in for Palacios on Friday afternoon and said they would match the bid...Saturday passed and they didn't...Sunday came and went...and then this morning Spurs came back with much better terms for the player.

Palacios was ironically going to stay at Wigan on Friday and snub Spurs before City came along and messed the thing up.

What a club.

Having a few bob does not buy you class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a thought on Roque...

Man City are the strangest club to deal with in this window.

I have had confirmed as fact that City went in for Palacios on Friday afternoon and said they would match the bid...Saturday passed and they didn't...Sunday came and went...and then this morning Spurs came back with much better terms for the player.

Palacios was ironically going to stay at Wigan on Friday and snub Spurs before City came along and messed the thing up.

What a club.

Having a few bob does not buy you class.

Nicko, don't know the whole truth behind this but maybe the following quote of the BBC website is the reason for the strange goings-on with Man City:

"Bellamy's move to City is the result of a remarkable "gentleman's agreement" between Harry Redknapp and Mark Hughes, which sees City and Hughes dropping out of the race to sign Wilson Palacios, while Spurs and Redknapp have ended their interest in Bellamy. (Various)"

Does seem to make sense with what you have said about Palacios and Bellamy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a thought on Roque...

Man City are the strangest club to deal with in this window.

I have had confirmed as fact that City went in for Palacios on Friday afternoon and said they would match the bid...Saturday passed and they didn't...Sunday came and went...and then this morning Spurs came back with much better terms for the player.

Palacios was ironically going to stay at Wigan on Friday and snub Spurs before City came along and messed the thing up.

What a club.

Having a few bob does not buy you class.

There was a quote on teletext today on the lines that Rednapp and MH had reached a gentlemen's agreement. Spurs would back out of the deal for Bellamy if City agreed not to go for Palacios.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nicko, don't know the whole truth behind this but maybe the following quote of the BBC website is the reason for the strange goings-on with Man City:

"Bellamy's move to City is the result of a remarkable "gentleman's agreement" between Harry Redknapp and Mark Hughes, which sees City and Hughes dropping out of the race to sign Wilson Palacios, while Spurs and Redknapp have ended their interest in Bellamy. (Various)"

Does seem to make sense with what you have said about Palacios and Bellamy.

Checked out that rumour on FRIDAY...and it was denied to me.

The players knew nothing about it and would have the final say on it.

Just think it is a daft story - end of.

Redknapp did not force his moeny men into a rise for Palacios until last night - so that doesn't fit with the 'agreement' angle at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who are these 4 very good strikers? Bellamy and Robinho (who is more of a wing foward) will be the only 2 worth having.

+ Jo and Bojinov (who they've stuck with despite his injuries and is back in action soon). So unless they want to buy Cruz and keep him in the reserve squad...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+ Jo and Bojinov (who they've stuck with despite his injuries and is back in action soon). So unless they want to buy Cruz and keep him in the reserve squad...

Jo will be lucky to get a game in the reserves. Bojinov won't be match fit for a while. Hughes has wanted to team Roque and Bellamy right from the start. I expect things to move now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+ Jo and Bojinov (who they've stuck with despite his injuries and is back in action soon). So unless they want to buy Cruz and keep him in the reserve squad...

Jo has got to be up there with the worst buys of all time. £18m?? He cost about the same as our entire starting XI against Newcastle on Saturday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ROQUE - The timing of the Man City offer is sadly down to them.

Selling Roque at 23:59 on deadline day is no good to man nor beast. We should have set a deadline of today otherwise it's up yours.

I don't undrestand this concern, and I've heard quite a few Rovers fans say it. The fact is Roque's clause doesn't kick in until the summer, there is NOTHING forcing us to sell. The later they leave their bid, the less chance (I would like to think) they have of Sam accepting it.

People are acting as if should Citeh make a last minute bid we'd have to accept it.....unless it's £40m I have confidence Sam would say "sorry you've left it too late for us to replace him" and make them wait til the summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't undrestand this concern, and I've heard quite a few Rovers fans say it. The fact is Roque's clause doesn't kick in until the summer, there is NOTHING forcing us to sell. The later they leave their bid, the less chance (I would like to think) they have of Sam accepting it.

People are acting as if should Citeh make a last minute bid we'd have to accept it.....unless it's £40m I have confidence Sam would say "sorry you've left it too late for us to replace him" and make them wait til the summer.

Don´t you see the possibility that the board will sell at the right price if the correct amount is reached whatever Sam may think of it? It´s absolutely crucial ###### don´t bid that amount when it´s no time for us to get a replacement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People are acting as if should Citeh make a last minute bid we'd have to accept it.....unless it's £40m I have confidence Sam would say "sorry you've left it too late for us to replace him" and make them wait til the summer.

Can you seriously see JW refusing £25m at any stage?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jo has got to be up there with the worst buys of all time. £18m?? He cost about the same as our entire starting XI against Newcastle on Saturday.

Jo was a great player for CSKA Moscow, if Hughes pays that much for him and then can't get him to play at least somewhat decent it's his fault. City's owners must be crazy (even business wise) to keep a manager who just throws money at the air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Announcements

  • You can now add BlueSky, Mastodon and X accounts to your BRFCS Profile.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.