Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

[Archived] Nicko's January Rumour Mill


Brownie

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The Keane for Cruz would be an interesting one. I would expect some cash coming our way as well as the player though. Also, Keane is a very different type of player to Cruz.

Also, if people are worried that he would look to move in 12 months time, that would only be possible if he has done well for us and then we would be looking for a decent fee for him. Assuming he would sign a 3 or 4 year deal which seems to be the norm these days.

I am however, unsure if he would want to come here.

Would still prefer we just kept Cruz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

to be fair though, 20million for roque is silly prices too. if we got paid that I would expect any club to ask for "their cut" - if you will- for any replacement we went in for.

Every price paid by City is silly.

We just want an even sillier one.

If fairness mattered, they would have dropped the whole thing last August.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rovers watched THREE strikers around Europe at the weekend - all fairly expensive.

That can only mean one outcome - get Roque's replacement and get him sold.

More details later.

The main question is, which i'm sure everone is thinking, are any of those strikers the same quality as RSC and are they worth the money we'll pay for them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"only" problem is how would we pay his wages???

What is Keane currently on? Im thinking Roque is on 60,000 a week (could be dreaming but thought i saw it on here!) Roque should be more valuable to liverpool than Keane as he is a target man & younger. Could we expect money coming our way?

I would rather see Roque stay but it is becoming more apparent that he wants to leave. I think this is a tricky one as the longer it goes on the less we can expect for him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nicko if we sell Roque and therefore get some cash in, is there a signal that we will be back in for the player you say Sam was disappointed the club didnt back him on?

Does this Board never learn. You back you manager 'cos he's the manager.

Depressed again. The message is they are not releasing money they took in the summer because they think they know better than the manager. The last one okay but this one has done a great job up to now. How long will they hold on to him. We're not out of the woods yet don't they know! :angry2::wacko::blink::angry2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that's true then I'm glad we didn't spend £5million on him. No way is he worth that much money, rather keep the money than waste it on him. Average player and is way over-rated on this MB. Keith Andrews managed to keep him quiet FFS at Ewood!

If Brownie is correct that it was Bullard then it's obviously a Head v Heart decision. He's the type of player that we need and Sam probably knows it BUT his knee must be an absolute wreck. To wrap so much investment up in a crock would be wrong especially given the recent first hand experience we have (Martin Dahlin) of buying sick notes in hope and of insurance companies reluctance to shell out on them. With the stakes so high and our finances so fragile we have to get every decision right. Gambling is for losers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is Keane currently on? Im thinking Roque is on 60,000 a week (could be dreaming but thought i saw it on here!) Roque should be more valuable to liverpool than Keane as he is a target man & younger. Could we expect money coming our way?

I would rather see Roque stay but it is becoming more apparent that he wants to leave. I think this is a tricky one as the longer it goes on the less we can expect for him

Bet he's on under 40 and nearer 30.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Brownie is correct that it was Bullard then it's obviously a Head v Heart decision. He's the type of player that we need and Sam probably knows it BUT his knee must be an absolute wreck. To wrap so much investment up in a crock would be wrong especially given the recent first hand experience we have (Martin Dahlin) of buying sick notes in hope and of insurance companies reluctance to shell out on them. With the stakes so high and our finances so fragile we have to get every decision right. Gambling is for losers.

Yes but don't you get a medical team and an insurer to check this out. Or do you just guess and play at being an expert like the Board appear to be doing. If he's not insurable he doesn't come - surely?

Unless we have an under 30's policy now (which might not be a bad thing) the manager has to be backed until the real experts say it's a no goer. We're going all amatuerish again and I thought that had changed in the last few weeks.

"I'll be amatuer knee specilist John."

"Oh okay I'll be amatuer thigh tickler Rob. What do you want to be Fred..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Announcements

  • You can now add BlueSky, Mastodon and X accounts to your BRFCS Profile.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.