Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

[Archived] Nicko's January Rumour Mill


Brownie

Recommended Posts

I disagree.

Not even God could make our centre midfield that good.

We have Dunn (too many injuries), Grella (hope he recovers totally to see how he plays), Mokoena (useless), Vogel (last option for any manager we had), Tugay (a true legend but too old), Andrews (championship player), Reid (always injured), Villanueva (on his way out).

Good review on our players I would suggest (although Carlos could stay, you never know now).

One thing I would wonder is, could we add Warnock and Emo to that list? I know it's not their current position, but they have both played there before with a reasonable amount of success? I would personally like to see Bert move inside if we get a true right winger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Am I alone in thinking that if we did sell Roque then the trustees would not release sufficient money to get a half decent replacement? I really fear that, as they have been unable to sell the club, they are trying to recover as much money as possible - what happened to the bentley money, Hughes compensation and the original transfer budget!!! I appreciate that we haven't got all the money upfront but the money is owed to us and so is an asset that we can borrow against.

If we leave finding a replacement too late by concentrating on defensive options first we will be in the same situation as we are with the Bentley replacement - up s*** creek without a paddle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I alone in thinking that if we did sell Roque then the trustees would not release sufficient money to get a half decent replacement? I really fear that, as they have been unable to sell the club, they are trying to recover as much money as possible - what happened to the bentley money, Hughes compensation and the original transfer budget!!! I appreciate that we haven't got all the money upfront but the money is owed to us and so is an asset that we can borrow against.

If we leave finding a replacement too late by concentrating on defensive options first we will be in the same situation as we are with the Bentley replacement - up s*** creek without a paddle.

We would have paid compo for Ince, plus we bought Grella (c£3m), Andrews (c£1.5m), Robinson (about £1m over what we got for Brad?), Carlos (£1m for the loan I believe) plus a fee additional contracts and increased wages etc. Plus don't forget we only got something like £10m from Bentley due to Arsenal taking a slice and of course some of that would have been used to pay debts etc. Doesn't really leave much else - maybe a few million.

If we sold Cruz for £15m I would expect some of that to go towards debts as well before anything was earmarked for transfers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possible but, for now, they are both first team options for right and left back.

And should be left there for the future. We all know Warnocks best position is at Left Back and Emerton's best position at Right Back. Why the need for new players in that position is beyond me. We need to focus on the right hand side of midfield and centre mid. Our forward line is perfectly fine at the moment.

Only if Roque goes we need to strengthen that position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear Man City's offer is not very big...nowhere near the figure needed.

I hope Rovers come out and reveal the figures. They should.

This is as farcical as the bid for him in the summer.

is it below the bid they made in the summer then nicko?

We should be cheeky to them and bid just £2m for Ireland and throw the ball back into their court MUPPETS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nicko, why do you think City's bid is as low as you say?

Is it the owners paying lip service to getting the players Sparky wants? Do they think Rovers will be pressurised into a low price? or maybe just showing that, after the bridge deal, they wont pay way over the odds for every player they want?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm hoping the City money men and Sparky are at conflict to what he is worth. We really need him to stay, otherwise we need to win the next 2 games, move up the table and then we could possibly attract a decent replacement towards the end of the window.

EDIT: Just a thought but could he be a smokescreen for a bigger arrival at City?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the offer is less than what they paid Wayne Bridge, which was £11 million.

So it sounds like £10 million guaranteed.

This fits with the tales told about the last £12 million bid which was only £8 million.

Sounds like they are trying to put in a pay-as-you-play element.

The gap between the clubs is great, so this will roll on for a while.

Wonder whether Man City will still back their manager if they get stuffed by Portsmouth on Saturday.

City's offers for Bellamy and Parker are also too low...and the Toure deal is 'agreed' but not done.

Hmm, makes you think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the offer is less than what they paid Wayne Bridge, which was £11 million.

So it sounds like £10 million guaranteed.

This fits with the tales told about the last £12 million bid which was only £8 million.

Sounds like they are trying to put in a pay-as-you-play element.

The gap between the clubs is great, so this will roll on for a while.

Wonder whether Man City will still back their manager if they get stuffed by Portsmouth on Saturday.

City's offers for Bellamy and Parker are also too low...and the Toure deal is 'agreed' but not done.

Hmm, makes you think.

LOL at £10 million, they can get stuffed.

I can't see them paying the £18 million figure which will be needed for us to consider whether we sell him or not. Looks like Roque is staying, unless this is some sort of ploy by Hughes and others to get Roque to put in a transfer request or unsettle him in order to greatly reduce his price...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why has Touré suddenly fallen out of favour with Arsenal, surely there have to be some off-the-pitch reasons? Especially if they're looking at Upson as a replacement as the papers are suggesting, because that doesn't make them stronger at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why has Touré suddenly fallen out of favour with Arsenal, surely there have to be some off-the-pitch reasons? Especially if they're looking at Upson as a replacement as the papers are suggesting, because that doesn't make them stronger at all.

Toure has been poor, but his head has also been turned by the Man City dollar.

City have a lot to answer for here - with several players.

Their tactic is to tap and then mess about with bids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is it below the bid they made in the summer then nicko?

We should be cheeky to them and bid just £2m for Ireland and throw the ball back into their court MUPPETS

I was thinking the same thing. If they are going to be so pathetic and disrespectful we should give them a taste of their own medicine and see how they like it. They would probably come out with the figures and slate us if we were to do that so why aren't we showing them who is in the driving seat with Santa Cruz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Announcements

  • You can now add BlueSky, Mastodon and X accounts to your BRFCS Profile.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.