Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

[Archived] Max Clifford - Something Sick


Recommended Posts

Feel free to talk about Goody here but my main point is that I want to express my deep unease with Clifford's role in publicly reading Jade Goody's last rites.

I assume he is being paid for his regular updates.

Am I wrong here, to find something vaguely sick about a unashamedly mercenary and selfish PR man meddling in something so inherently sacred and sensitive as the process of death by cancer? The thing is, I can't precisely explain what I find problematic - so perhaps it is only my personal prejudice against Max Clifford. Maybe more good is coming off his publicity of Goody than bad. AFter all, it is publicising the real threat of cancer and all that.

However, I can't help feeling that beneath the sentimentalism and condolences, Clifford is being a venal, exploitative pillock. Obviously, there's nothing illegal here and Goody would no doubt vehemently defend Clifford's role, but I just find it morally wrong. Even if Clifford is not being paid, his past record of cold-hearted selfishness makes his role inappropriate here, I feel.

I don't know much about Max Clifford. However, on a TV programme, I heard from his own mouth the suggestion that getting Westlife dropping in at a hospital ward of children cancer sufferers is MUTUALLY BENEFICIAL. (Westlife get good publicity, dying children and their parents have their hearts lifted by meeting the stars).

Isn't that the most sick, avaricious, indescribably inhumane attitude? I guess we should at least appreciate his shameless honesty.

Or am I being melodramatic and idealistic?

PR is increasingly a massive force, even being described as the hidden government. It's basically about manipulating people for cash. Advertising is similar - but at least advertising GENERALLY engages, at least partly, the conscious mind - allowing the individual to put up some resistance. However, PR is all about by-passing into the unconscious of the subject and brainwashing them into particular views. It's insidious and disgusting - and massive, massive business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know much about Max Clifford. However, on a TV programme, I heard from his own mouth the suggestion that getting Westlife dropping in at a hospital ward of children cancer sufferers is MUTUALLY BENEFICIAL. (Westlife get good publicity, dying children and their parents have their hearts lifted by meeting the stars).

rover6 I understand where you're coming from with this post, I don't have any time for Clifford or the tabloid media he works with / feeds off. However you're comment above could be applied to many a star / sports person / personality etc It just happens Clifford has spoken the truth. I'm sure there are many who give their time quietly and freely but please don't be fooled into thinking the world is full of personalities giving their time for the greater good of mankind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't say it was always just for cash. The Government are pretty adept at PR (known generally as spin).

It's a pity Jade Goody is mixed up with the odious Clifford, but I can see where she is coming from. It must be one of the most frightening situations I can imagine, a dying mother with two young children, worried sick about who is going to bring them up when she dies and wanting to provide for them as best she can. It has all happened at a frightening speed for the poor woman.

Ananova reports

Mr Clifford said: "Jade has told me to concentrate on making as much money as possible. It's for her children. She said 'I'm ignorant but I want my boys to have the best possible education.'"

I am hoping that something good comes from all this. The age of testing women for this cancer has been raised in England, which is wrong and it needs to be lowered again. In Scotland and Wales women are called from the age of 20, but guess what - in England the age has been changed to 25 - too late for some. All you guys out there need to make sure that your women go for smear testing when they are called. The recently introduced HPV vaccine does not cover all the strains of this cancer. There also needs to be much more research on the origins of this cancer, it was not so long ago that women suffering from this cancer were branded promiscuous when in fact many women suffering from it had only ever had one sexual partner.

This Australian site explains clearly and concisely about Cervical Cancer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All you guys out there need to make sure that your women go for smear testing when they are called.

I read or heard somewhere that Jade Goody had an abnormal smear and ignored it. Apart from her raking in as much cash as possible to care for her family after she's gone (which I can't fault at all), the one good thing that could come out of this is if the media reported the one daft mistake she has made that has cost her life. At the moment the reporting seems to be a mixture of morbid fascination and preparation for a bout of professional mourning. But I think that if they focused more on that mistake and got people talking about it openly, then it might make a few more people take the issue seriously and miss or ignore the results of their own tests.

More reporting like this;

http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/comme...dy-1623826.html

And less like this;

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Showbiz-N...315223600?f=rss

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kylie had breast cancer. Again, women need to be aware of any changes in their breasts, lumps etc, as screening does not start in this country until later, missing many younger women who have the disease further information on this siteand here. Men can also get breast cancer although it is rare.

this is the pap test It is only available on the nhs every three years, so women need to be aware and question any unusual symptoms they may have.

Whilst we are at it, you guys need to be aware of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the one good thing that could come out of this is if the media reported the one daft mistake she has made that has cost her life.

Great point and illustrates PR in a sentence.

Publicising Goody's error of ignoring her test/s is bad PR for Goody - and therefore you won't find Clifford mentioning it, I wager. Even after she has passed away.

But mentioning it - publicising it - would be for the greater good of the population. It could SAVE LIVES.

But what are lives, when money and image are so important. :closedeyes:

However you're comment above could be applied to many a star / sports person / personality etc It just happens Clifford has spoken the truth. I'm sure there are many who give their time quietly and freely but please don't be fooled into thinking the world is full of personalities giving their time for the greater good of mankind.

You're right. It's common place. In fact, there's an argument to say that even Rovers do it, when they send footballers to hospitals and then pat themselves on the back on the official website.

I guess, it's all about intention. If someone intends to be generous and make others happy, and, as a side-effect, they get image benefit, then there can be no complaints. Sometimes you have to accept benefits from being charitable.

I agree, at least Clifford has been honest about where his heart lies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm deeply unsettled by the coverage of Jade 'Is Cambridge Abroad' Goody's illness. I don't buy those papers reporting the stories but you really can't miss the pictures and inane platitudes leaping from the front pages. The serious spectre of cancer has taken a back seat to the prurient desire to see a semi-famous individual withering away. The most despicable inference however - and I don't think I'm reading too much into this - is that this person's fate, and that of her family, is somehow unusual and therefore more newsworthy than than the countless victims of this terrible disease and the heartbreak and pain that it leaves in its wake. I don't hold Goody herself responsible for promoting cancer to the front page, as if it's only a worthwhile story now, rather the people who are leeching off this sad situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm deeply unsettled by the coverage of Jade 'Is Cambridge Abroad' Goody's illness. I don't buy those papers reporting the stories but you really can't miss the pictures and inane platitudes leaping from the front pages. The serious spectre of cancer has taken a back seat to the prurient desire to see a semi-famous individual withering away. The most despicable inference however - and I don't think I'm reading too much into this - is that this person's fate, and that of her family, is somehow unusual and therefore more newsworthy than than the countless victims of this terrible disease and the heartbreak and pain that it leaves in its wake. I don't hold Goody herself responsible for promoting cancer to the front page, as if it's only a worthwhile story now, rather the people who are leeching off this sad situation.

But if the ensuing publicity makes one person do something and by doing something saves a life, then it's all been worthwhile in my book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.