Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

[Archived] Blackburn Rovers Transfer Topic


Recommended Posts

...if Arsenal were serious about him then you have to trust Whinger's judgement, the last time they spent £10m on a striker from the french league, it was Adebayor

Wenger did also spend a fortune on Francis Jeffers though :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Wenger did also spend a fortune on Francis Jeffers though :o

Thats a very good point... Didn't Whinger say he was the "FOX IN THE BOX"??? Didn't look like that in a Rovers shirt anyway :lol: ... Allthough I did say from the French league, Jeffers was from Everton was he not??? ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the article in the LET, we are in talks with 1 or 2 other foreign strikers as well as Chamakh. Anyone know who they are? I assume 1 is Zigic but not sure about the other. Maybe Janko, maybe Hoffer? And it also says Sam will "really start kicking on" with the striker search tomorrow so hopefully we will be getting a bit more news later this week and maybe, just maybe, we will have a new striker sooner rather than later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Backroom

Is Chamakh the fella who had a youtube vid which started with 6 or 7 horrendous misses?

He looked good in the rest of it to be fair it was just a bizarrely compiled video.

I have to say I know nothing of him other than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

are these the same powers that be, that didn`t feel the need to replace bentley? they will look at the form of the team under sam at the end of last season(minus roque), and feel that it`s good enough to be safe in this league over 38 games(i agree with that). that is the only aim i think for our board now i reckon as we are considered in a state of financial limbo until a take over can happen.

if you want to continue to be optimistic of our chances of spending 8m on a striker, then your perfectly entitled to be. i just beg to differ.

We will get a striker, we have to basically BUT every striker / player that we have paid big money for in recent years has been average at best. Cole, Grabbi, Ferguson, Davies etc so consider that the board have seen our last manager to turn up with the likes of Bentley and Warnock for approx a million, Nelsen for zilch, RSC for 3.5m, Samba for 300k so why on earth would lead them to think that we need to spend 10m or whatever on just 1 player who without taking wages into account will lose us a whopping 2.5m (or approx half our total ST revenue) per annum in depreciation alone? Dont forget players valued at 10m expect wages in line with that and don't forget also that they get injured as much as one on low wages.

Why can so few people see the issue from the boards perspective? They have kept a tiny impoverished club eating at footballs top table for a long time now (albeit based on JW's generosity) so why not put some faith in them instead of doom mongering?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Chamakh the fella who had a youtube vid which started with 6 or 7 horrendous misses?

He looked good in the rest of it to be fair it was just a bizarrely compiled video.

I have to say I know nothing of him other than that.

That's the guy yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Chamakh the fella who had a youtube vid which started with 6 or 7 horrendous misses?

He looked good in the rest of it to be fair it was just a bizarrely compiled video.

I have to say I know nothing of him other than that.

this guy has name dropped us twice now. i`m sure rovers must have looked at him, but maybe won`t be too pleased at him mentioning it to the world press as a means to attract arsenal`s interest, and will now look elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We will get a striker, we have to basically BUT every striker / player that we have paid big money for in recent years has been average at best. Cole, Grabbi, Ferguson, Davies etc so consider that the board have seen our last manager to turn up with the likes of Bentley and Warnock for approx a million, Nelsen for zilch, RSC for 3.5m, Samba for 300k so why on earth would lead them to think that we need to spend 10m or whatever on just 1 player who without taking wages into account will lose us a whopping 2.5m (or approx half our total ST revenue) per annum in depreciation alone? Dont forget players valued at 10m expect wages in line with that and don't forget also that they get injured as much as one on low wages.

Why can so few people see the issue from the boards perspective? They have kept a tiny impoverished club eating at footballs top table for a long time now (albeit based on JW's generosity) so why not put some faith in them instead of doom mongering?

i`m not. you`ve just highlighted my point exactly. rovers will wait to bring in a striker for a bargain price(when they can) rather than spend 10m on one with 60,000 a week wages. i BACK this stance and think we should go as we are until we can get what suits the clubs budget. plenty will complain if that proves the case though, and i don`t think that`s right. a little more faith should be shown in who we already have after the way they performed under sam last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We will get a striker, we have to basically BUT every striker / player that we have paid big money for in recent years has been average at best. Cole, Grabbi, Ferguson, Davies etc so consider that the board have seen our last manager to turn up with the likes of Bentley and Warnock for approx a million, Nelsen for zilch, RSC for 3.5m, Samba for 300k so why on earth would lead them to think that we need to spend 10m or whatever on just 1 player who without taking wages into account will lose us a whopping 2.5m (or approx half our total ST revenue) per annum in depreciation alone? Dont forget players valued at 10m expect wages in line with that and don't forget also that they get injured as much as one on low wages.

Why can so few people see the issue from the boards perspective? They have kept a tiny impoverished club eating at footballs top table for a long time now (albeit based on JW's generosity) so why not put some faith in them instead of doom mongering?

On football matters you usually get things right. How strange...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nicko?

Have you been in contact with your French sources about Chamakh and may shed any light on this situation?

Chamakh is a strange one. He has the Champions League to look forward to and yet is flirting with any club going. I thought Arsenal were favourites, but if not then he would be one who has a lot of appeal. Rovers did watch him last season, but it puzzled me at the time...maybe they had some inside info he would leave?

Very strange, but a good option if he is actually available and interested and not just chasing a new contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chamakh is a strange one. He has the Champions League to look forward to and yet is flirting with any club going. I thought Arsenal were favourites, but if not then he would be one who has a lot of appeal. Rovers did watch him last season, but it puzzled me at the time...maybe they had some inside info he would leave?

Very strange, but a good option if he is actually available and interested and not just chasing a new contract.

Sounds like he really wants to join this league if his comments are accurate and would be willing to discuss a deal with us. Sunderland can probably outgun us on the wages though and Spurs, well they have the London lifestyle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Announcements

  • You can now add BlueSky, Mastodon and X accounts to your BRFCS Profile.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.