Bobby G Posted August 30, 2009 Posted August 30, 2009 Maybe he was offered to Hull and Brown. They are pals arent they?
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Iceman Posted August 30, 2009 Posted August 30, 2009 Is transfer window closing tomorrow, or have they extended for 1 more day like last season?
Florida Rover Posted August 30, 2009 Posted August 30, 2009 won't close until tues b/c of bank holiday,or so I have read discussed
RovertheHill Posted August 30, 2009 Posted August 30, 2009 The reason we have no money is that the club has been running itself on the last penny for the last few seasons and last season made them really see what it would have been like had they gone down, I am talking more leeds than charlton as well. Therefore coupled with the fact they realised spending around 75% of your turnover on wages (which is in the top 5 in the leage) is ridiculous, and they decided to reduce costs by around £50,000 a week or £2,600,000 a year and get rid of the bank debt, which was at around £13,000,000 and add to this the lost revenue in places which they had budgeted for (around £3,000,000) and you have around £16,000,000 this year which they wanted to reduce/remove. The comes the maths: Stephen Warnock +£7,000,000 & £35,000pw Paul Gallagher + £750,000 & £15,000pw Nick Blackman + £4,000pw for 5months Alex Marrow + £350pw for 5 months Gavin Gunning + £350pw for 5 months Alan Judge + £2,000pw for 5 months Mark Bunn + £4,000pw for 5 months Keith Treacy + £7,000pw for 5 months Josh O'Keefe + £350pw Roque Santa Cruz + £17,000,000 & £50,000pw Matt Derbyshire + £3,500,000 & £20,000pw Jamie Clarke +£350pw Dean Winnard +£350pw Aaron Mokoena + £20,000pw Andre Ooijer + £35,000pw Tony Kane + £350pw Tugay + £10,000pw Pascal Chimbonda -£1,500,00 & £35,000pw Michel Salgado - £40,000pw Nikola Kalinic - £6,500,000 & £35,000pw Franco Di Santo -£25,000pw for 5 months Steven N'Zonzi - £500,000 & £7,000pw Elrio van Heerden - £7,000 pw Lars Jacobsen - £20,000pw Gael Givet - £3,500,000 & £35,000pw Bank Balance = £250,000 Wages Balance = Still -£50,000 so take that off the bank balance and we are still around £2,500,000 away from where we want to be, yes the money could be used, but is it worth risking our clubs life when we should still be safe, IF we looked in major trouble, or Big Sam thought we didnt have enough to survive then money vs risk would be reassessed. Are these figures real or conjecture? If the former how is this in the public domain? (not having a go btw just asking - sh*t, how bad has this board become when you have to append stuff like that on?)
spencey7 Posted August 30, 2009 Posted August 30, 2009 Andrews was offered to a Premiership club last week and they declined the opportunity. It was a manager to manager phone call and I know for an absolute fact it happened. If this is true (and I have to say I doubt it is, unfortunately), then it's going to add some significant fuel to the fire for the "You-Don't-Know-What-You're-Doing" crowd. Virtually every Rovers fan (or at least the VAST majority) has been able to see since the second he donned the shirt that Keith Andrews is nowhere near good enough to play in this league. Yet this summer we turn down an offer for him and give him a pay rise - before deciding to try and flog him. What is going on?
RovertheHill Posted August 30, 2009 Posted August 30, 2009 If this is true (and I have to say I doubt it is, unfortunately), then it's going to add some significant fuel to the fire for the "You-Don't-Know-What-You're-Doing" crowd. Virtually every Rovers fan (or at least the VAST majority) has been able to see since the second he donned the shirt that Keith Andrews is nowhere near good enough to play in this league. Yet this summer we turn down an offer for him and give him a pay rise - before deciding to try and flog him. What is going on? It could be that JW promised Andrews the new contract and as a man of honour followed it through? Or maybe our crocks are coming back slightly ahead of schedule? Or of course the manager may have lost the plot? Who knows? As a matter of interest but OT why has your username changed? What's the (and a half) bit mean?
ebenrocks Posted August 30, 2009 Posted August 30, 2009 If this is true (and I have to say I doubt it is, unfortunately), then it's going to add some significant fuel to the fire for the "You-Don't-Know-What-You're-Doing" crowd. Virtually every Rovers fan (or at least the VAST majority) has been able to see since the second he donned the shirt that Keith Andrews is nowhere near good enough to play in this league. Yet this summer we turn down an offer for him and give him a pay rise - before deciding to try and flog him. What is going on? do you even stop repeating yourself?
RibbleValleyRover Posted August 30, 2009 Posted August 30, 2009 If this is true (and I have to say I doubt it is, unfortunately), then it's going to add some significant fuel to the fire for the "You-Don't-Know-What-You're-Doing" crowd. Virtually every Rovers fan (or at least the VAST majority) has been able to see since the second he donned the shirt that Keith Andrews is nowhere near good enough to play in this league. Yet this summer we turn down an offer for him and give him a pay rise - before deciding to try and flog him. What is going on? Either Sam rates or him or JW is going ahead with his promise of a new deal because he featured a lot last season. Managers have their reasons for picking certain players, just have to respect their decision i guess. I think Sam picks Andrews because he is fit every week and tries hard, i don't think he would feature much if every player was fit.
Amo Posted August 30, 2009 Posted August 30, 2009 And so three people consecutively demean the point of the Ignore feature. Cheers, guys.
American Posted August 30, 2009 Posted August 30, 2009 It could be that JW promised Andrews the new contract and as a man of honour followed it through? Or maybe our crocks are coming back slightly ahead of schedule? Or of course the manager may have lost the plot? Who knows? As a matter of interest but OT why has your username changed? What's the (and a half) bit mean? Has Ste written all over it. I think it is supposed to be his age.
RovertheHill Posted August 30, 2009 Posted August 30, 2009 And so three people consecutively demean the point of the Ignore feature. Cheers, guys. Sorry - but I haven't chosen to ignore him. You could always ignore him the old-fashioned way...
spencey7 Posted August 30, 2009 Posted August 30, 2009 As a matter of interest but OT why has your username changed? What's the (and a half) bit mean? Good question! Nothing to do with me. I assume it's an attempt at "humour" by one of the mods, however they might have remembered that humour relates to something being funny...
Fylde Coast Fan Posted August 30, 2009 Posted August 30, 2009 If this is true (and I have to say I doubt it is, unfortunately), then it's going to add some significant fuel to the fire for the "You-Don't-Know-What-You're-Doing" crowd. Virtually every Rovers fan (or at least the VAST majority) has been able to see since the second he donned the shirt that Keith Andrews is nowhere near good enough to play in this league. Yet this summer we turn down an offer for him and give him a pay rise - before deciding to try and flog him. What is going on? Maybe Sam knows what's obvious to most rational people - Andrews is a hard worker but his ability isn't up to competing at the top level. If you were Sam and were told "you can only buy if you sell", wouldn't you try and sell the least capable first? It's worth a punt getting Andrews out and someone else in, surely.
nicko Posted August 30, 2009 Posted August 30, 2009 Capoue - the French midfield who came on trial - has just joined Auxerre on loan...
tashor Posted August 30, 2009 Posted August 30, 2009 A customer enters a pet shop. Mr. Praline: 'Ello, I wish to register a complaint. (The owner does not respond.) Mr. Praline: 'Ello, Miss? Owner: What do you mean "miss"? Mr. Praline: I'm sorry, I have a cold. I wish to make a complaint! Owner: We're closin' for lunch. Mr. Praline: Never mind that, my lad. I wish to complain about this parrot what I purchased not half an hour ago from this very boutique. Owner: Oh yes, the, uh, the Norwegian Blue...What's,uh...What's wrong with it? Mr. Praline: I'll tell you what's wrong with it, my lad. 'E's dead, that's what's wrong with it! Owner: No, no, 'e's uh,...he's resting. Mr. Praline: Look, matey, I know a dead parrot when I see one, and I'm looking at one right now. Owner: No no he's not dead, he's, he's restin'! Remarkable bird, the Norwegian Blue, idn'it, ay? Beautiful plumage! Mr. Praline: The plumage don't enter into it. It's stone dead. Owner: Nononono, no, no! 'E's resting! Mr. Praline: All right then, if he's restin', I'll wake him up! (shouting at the cage) 'Ello, Mister Polly Parrot! I've got a lovely fresh cuttle fish for you if you show... (owner hits the cage) Owner: There, he moved! Mr. Praline: No, he didn't, that was you hitting the cage! Owner: I never!! Mr. Praline: Yes, you did! Owner: I never, never did anything... Mr. Praline: (yelling and hitting the cage repeatedly) 'ELLO POLLY!!!!! Testing! Testing! Testing! Testing! This is your nine o'clock alarm call! (Takes parrot out of the cage and thumps its head on the counter. Throws it up in the air and watches it plummet to the floor.) Mr. Praline: Now that's what I call a dead parrot. Owner: No, no.....No, 'e's stunned! Mr. Praline: STUNNED?!? Owner: Yeah! You stunned him, just as he was wakin' up! Norwegian Blues stun easily, major. Mr. Praline: Um...now look...now look, mate, I've definitely 'ad enough of this. That parrot is definitely deceased, and when I purchased it not 'alf an hour ago, you assured me that its total lack of movement was due to it bein' tired and shagged out following a prolonged squawk. Owner: Well, he's...he's, ah...probably pining for the fjords. Mr. Praline: PININ' for the FJORDS?!?!?!? What kind of talk is that?, look, why did he fall flat on his back the moment I got 'im home? Owner: The Norwegian Blue prefers keepin' on it's back! Remarkable bird, id'nit, squire? Lovely plumage! Mr. Praline: Look, I took the liberty of examining that parrot when I got it home, and I discovered the only reason that it had been sitting on its perch in the first place was that it had been NAILED there. (pause) Owner: Well, o'course it was nailed there! If I hadn't nailed that bird down, it would have nuzzled up to those bars, bent 'em apart with its beak, and VOOM! Feeweeweewee! Mr. Praline: "VOOM"?!? Mate, this bird wouldn't "voom" if you put four million volts through it! 'E's bleedin' demised! Owner: No no! 'E's pining! Mr. Praline: 'E's not pinin'! 'E's passed on! This parrot is no more! He has ceased to be! 'E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker! 'E's a stiff! Bereft of life, 'e rests in peace! If you hadn't nailed 'im to the perch 'e'd be pushing up the daisies! 'Is metabolic processes are now 'istory! 'E's off the twig! 'E's kicked the bucket, 'e's shuffled off 'is mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleedin' choir invisibile!! THIS IS AN EX-PARROT!! (pause) Owner: Well, I'd better replace it, then. (he takes a quick peek behind the counter) Sorry squire, I've had a look 'round the back of the shop, and uh, we're right out of parrots. Mr. Praline: I see. I see, I get the picture. Owner: I got a slug. (pause) Mr. Praline: Pray, does it talk? Owner: Nnnnot really. Mr. Praline: WELL IT'S HARDLY A BLOODY REPLACEMENT, IS IT?!!???!!? Owner: N-no, I guess not. (gets ashamed, looks at his feet) Mr. Praline: Well. (pause) Owner: (quietly) D'you.... d'you want to come back to my place? Mr. Praline: (looks around) Yeah, all right, sure.
deazel Posted August 30, 2009 Posted August 30, 2009 I think I will wet myself with excitement if we get can rid of Andrews and bring in Emana.
Baz Posted August 30, 2009 Posted August 30, 2009 The reason we have no money is that the club has been running itself on the last penny for the last few seasons and last season made them really see what it would have been like had they gone down, I am talking more leeds than charlton as well. Therefore coupled with the fact they realised spending around 75% of your turnover on wages (which is in the top 5 in the leage) is ridiculous, and they decided to reduce costs by around £50,000 a week or £2,600,000 a year and get rid of the bank debt, which was at around £13,000,000 and add to this the lost revenue in places which they had budgeted for (around £3,000,000) and you have around £16,000,000 this year which they wanted to reduce/remove. The comes the maths: Stephen Warnock +£7,000,000 & £35,000pw Paul Gallagher + £750,000 & £15,000pw Nick Blackman + £4,000pw for 5months Alex Marrow + £350pw for 5 months Gavin Gunning + £350pw for 5 months Alan Judge + £2,000pw for 5 months Mark Bunn + £4,000pw for 5 months Keith Treacy + £7,000pw for 5 months Josh O'Keefe + £350pw Roque Santa Cruz + £17,000,000 & £50,000pw Matt Derbyshire + £3,500,000 & £20,000pw Jamie Clarke +£350pw Dean Winnard +£350pw Aaron Mokoena + £20,000pw Andre Ooijer + £35,000pw Tony Kane + £350pw Tugay + £10,000pw Pascal Chimbonda -£1,500,00 & £35,000pw Michel Salgado - £40,000pw Nikola Kalinic - £6,500,000 & £35,000pw Franco Di Santo -£25,000pw for 5 months Steven N'Zonzi - £500,000 & £7,000pw Elrio van Heerden - £7,000 pw Lars Jacobsen - £20,000pw Gael Givet - £3,500,000 & £35,000pw Bank Balance = £250,000 Wages Balance = Still -£50,000 so take that off the bank balance and we are still around £2,500,000 away from where we want to be, yes the money could be used, but is it worth risking our clubs life when we should still be safe, IF we looked in major trouble, or Big Sam thought we didnt have enough to survive then money vs risk would be reassessed. No offence, but theres no way you know those details. Following the logic though, we nearly were relegated last season, by trying to cut costs surely we are almost sealing the fate whether it be this or the next 2-3 seasons we will get relegated if we sell our best players and dont re-invest into the team.
Tris Posted August 30, 2009 Posted August 30, 2009 100 per cent true with the person in question now, no source names for obvious reasons Andrews was offered to a Premiership club last week and they declined the opportunity. It was a manager to manager phone call and I know for an absolute fact it happened. So were you out drinking with Wenger or Rednkapp? It can't have been Hodgson because he was at Villa Park live on tv whilst you were hobnobbing with the "person in question" ...
doctorryan Posted August 30, 2009 Posted August 30, 2009 It looks like Rothen has Schalke as a backup plan if we don't get our stuff together. Any idea of the fee 04 is paying Alan? What a shame if we don't step in and get it done.
Silencio Posted August 30, 2009 Posted August 30, 2009 Why the hell did we not accept the 3 million for Andrews earlier in the summer if we are trying to get rid of him now?
ABBEY Posted August 30, 2009 Posted August 30, 2009 Why the hell did we not accept the 3 million for Andrews earlier in the summer if we are trying to get rid of him now? because us punters are not the experts...cmon thote same had taught us that
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.