Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

[Archived] West Ham Vs Rovers


BPF

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 357
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

If we got a penalty I wouldn't even cheer because I can 100% know we'll let Roberts take it :-(

  • Backroom
Posted

So i take it you don't class McCarthy as a Premiership striker if its based on goals this season?

Posted

DiSanto is also known for 1-1 mishaps this season though. he gets the benefit of the doubt due to foreign name and youth.

Roberts is known for his 1-on-1 mishaps for the last 3 years though, he gets the benefit of the doubt for what exactly? He's the only striker you would actually BACK to miss a one-on-one!

Posted

Yes Di Santo wouldn't have made the chance. We know this. We also already knew that Roberts wouldn't finish it.

It should therefore be obvious to the expert that playing either or up front on his own is likely to lead to NO GOALS. We've half a season of evidence for Di Santo and a fews years worth for Roberts to come to this conclusion.

Posted

So i take it you don't class McCarthy as a Premiership striker if its based on goals this season?

Of course you have to factor in minutes played into the ratio.

Another important consideration is past performances. Di Santo has few very goals at all even for his age. His goal for Rovers, I believe he knew very little about.

Posted

And now that Everton takes the lead against Wigan, every other game is going the way we'd like. Fulham, Wigan and Bolton losing, Hull and Wolves drawing.

Posted

Based on goals scored in the Premiership this season I don't really class Di Santo as a Premiership Striker

Nonsense. He's good enough for Chelsea but not a Premiership striker? Di Santo is plainly a better player than Roberts, who would just about be a good Championship striker.

Posted

Nonsense. He's good enough for Chelsea but not a Premiership striker? Di Santo is plainly a better player than Roberts, who would just about be a good Championship striker.

Good enough for Chelsea? I'm sorry I didn't realise he was a regular first teamer for them...

Posted

We've actually looked pretty threatening on set pieces today. Which is good, though it makes me laugh when EVERY commentator says stuff like "Rovers will always be dangerous from set pieces" Not when Gamst mkII was involved, Gamst mkIII is looking pretty decent at them now. Though the long throws still haven't looked like working, ever.

Posted

Nonsense. He's good enough for Chelsea but not a Premiership striker? Di Santo is plainly a better player than Roberts, who would just about be a good Championship striker.

He is not good enough for Chelsea, hence him being here

  • Backroom
Posted

Come on ref blow for full time, if everything stayed the same it would make a very good week for us

Posted

Good enough for Chelsea? I'm sorry I didn't realise he was a regular first teamer for them...

Good enough to be on their books. Don't see them knocking our door down to add Roberts to their ranks?

Posted

Good enough to be on their books. Don't see them knocking our door down to add Roberts to their ranks?

I think you'll find a large majority of Chelsea fans hoping that he stays with us this Summer...

Posted

I think you'll find a large majority of Chelsea fans hoping that he stays with us this Summer...

Source?

Two points dropped against West Ham for the second time this season ....

  • Backroom
Posted

FT a very good away point

It goes both ways, not losing was a lot more important than winning today

8 points outside the drop zone as it stands

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.