[Archived] Election

[SouthAussieRover]

Jim..... one for your album.

http://news.aol.co.uk/pm-welcomes-thatcher-to-downing-st/article/20100608145722543629887?icid=main|uk|dl1|link8|http%3A%2F%2Fnews.aol.co.uk%2Fpm-welcomes-thatcher-to-downing-st%2Farticle%2F20100608145722543629887

That is the most reprehensible post that you've ever made!

What sort of politician/person uses a person suffering from dementia for his own benefit.

I'm going to have a nightmare tonight

[adopted scouser]

Jim..... one for your album.

http://news.aol.co.uk/pm-welcomes-thatcher-to-downing-st/article/20100608145722543629887?icid=main|uk|dl1|link8|http%3A%2F%2Fnews.aol.co.uk%2Fpm-welcomes-thatcher-to-downing-st%2Farticle%2F20100608145722543629887

Nice to see a real leader outside No 10.

And great to see that porker Abbott running for the Labour leadership, if she gets it they'll never get back in.

[thenodrog]

Nice to see a real leader outside No 10.

And great to see that porker Abbott running for the Labour leadership, if she gets it they'll never get back in.

Is she? Hells teeth! Sat alongside Portillo every week she is a weekly embarrassment to the Labour party. Thick as a bar top she is.

Oh and her loud critisisisms of private education did not stop her sending her own son to one.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3229453.stm

A hypocrite or what?

btw anybody know how 'James' went on and where he is now?

http://img.timeinc.n..._blair_0510.jpg

You couldn't have found a better pic imo. Bliar looks well p1ssed off with his buddy whilst Broon looks like a homosexual ballet dancer. Nice.

[Paul]

Is she? Hells teeth! Sat alongside Portillo every week she is a weekly embarrassment to the Labour party. Thick as a bar top she is.

Oh and her loud critisisisms of private education did not stop her sending her own son to one.

http://news.bbc.co.u...ics/3229453.stm

A hypocrite or what?

btw anybody know how 'James' went on and where he is now?

You couldn't have found a better pic imo. Bliar looks well p1ssed off with his buddy whilst Broon looks like a homosexual ballet dancer. Nice.

Is that bitch still alive?

Thats uncalled for and not very nice.

Pretty bloody stupid too given your choice of sig.

So where would that place "thick as a bar top" and "homosexual ballet dancer"?

Critisisisms?

[BiggusLaddus]

Observations surely?

[broadsword]

In the spirit of co-operation here's a reminder of a golden era in British economic and political history.

Gordon Brown's face and the word "golden" make uncomfortable bed-fellows.

[thenodrog]

So where would that place "thick as a bar top" and "homosexual ballet dancer"?

1. I take it as an early riser that you haven't watched her toe curlingly embarrassing performances on 'This week'? You should before you comment.

2. Does Brown favour a homosexual ballet dancer in that picture? Yes or no?

[broadsword]

Calling a man a "homosexual ballet dancer" seems to infer that there are hetero male ballet dancers.

Shurely shome mishtake?

[thenodrog]

Calling a man a "homosexual ballet dancer" seems to infer that there are hetero male ballet dancers.

I've often thought it'd be a bloody great career for a straight bloke. Ballet dancing's wasted on homo's.

[Bazzanotsogreat]

Call him myopic...go on, you know you want to.

Never knew you read all my posts chuck- feel all embarrassed that you hang on my every word.

[adopted scouser]

Lord Prescott will need adding to the list soon.

Pathetic isn't it ? If they had any conviction they would turn it down.

Socialists, all equal ? Some a lot more 'equal' than others

[tony gale's mic]

Pathetic isn't it ? If they had any conviction they would turn it down.

Socialists, all equal ? Some a lot more 'equal' than others

What a load of rubbish. Just because you're a member of a left wing party it doesn't mean you think everyone should be equal; I think you'll find that's communism.

It's like me calling the Tories hypocrites for not abolishing the NHS.

[jim mk2]

Tories are hypocrites for not abolishing the NHS because ideologically they are opposed to any form of state care. But then Tory and hypocrites are words that naturally belong in the same sentence. I read today that the Tory front bench are each worth between £6m - £10m so the greedy born-to-rule @#/?s will certainly feel the pain of the forthcoming public service cuts and tax rises they intend to inflict on the general populace.

[thenodrog]

But then Tory and hypocrites are words that naturally belong in the same sentence.

Are you sure Jim? I think you need to look up 'hypocrite' in a dictionary. You appear to be unclear about the meaning of the word.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article7078846.ece

In 2004 he (Podger Prescott) railed against the blue-blooded aristocrats, telling a Labour party regional conference: Now is the time to rid ourselves of the remaining rump of hereditaries in the Lords. They are an offence against democracy.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/columnists/reade/2010/06/03/house-of-vermin-115875-22305877/

Podger..... "vermin to ermine"

You two don't appear to like the 'All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others' quote so how about applying this to your heroes.......

"No question now, what had happened to the faces of the pigs. The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which."

Animal Farm (George Orwell)

Anyway Lord Two Jags of Podgerville is not alone in his greed is he? How about this lot of Champagne socialists having their snouts in out trough? http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/blackburndarwenhyndburnribble/8207878.__200k_in____golden_goodbyes____to_former_East_Lancs_MPs/

At least two of those are breezing straight into well paid jobs on the back of their parliamentary contacts, yet they will still grab the golden handshakes for all they are worth. Would you care to comment on the shysters?

Oh and btw Jim I make no comment on people wanting to be wealthy cos I guess we all do but on the subject of Champagne Socialists I'd imagine that by now Teflon Tony is worth more than the entire Tory front bench on his own.

[roversmum]

Isn't the dude who funds the Labour Party more wealthy than Abramovich? So Mr Roversmum tells me and he is pretty well up on politics.

[tashor]

I read today that the Tory front bench are each worth between £6m - £10m

Mmnn..........not bad, but personally I think they are worth MORE to the country.......

What were the last lot valued at? £10k each and cheap at half the price.....

Nice to see that even though Rovers have to shop in the bargain basement the country can afford premier league politicians now after getting rid of the previous rabble.

[koi]

Tories are hypocrites for not abolishing the NHS because ideologically they are opposed to any form of state care. But then Tory and hypocrites are words that naturally belong in the same sentence. I read today that the Tory front bench are each worth between £6m - £10m so the greedy born-to-rule @#/?s will certainly feel the pain of the forthcoming public service cuts and tax rises they intend to inflict on the general populace.

And this from a supporter of a party that decided to wipe away everything they stand for by abolishing Clause 4 - the cornerstone of the Labour Party. Hypocrisy is a Labour specialism.

'Greedy born-to-rule @#/?s' eh Jim. Do we need to examine the three front-runners for the Labour leadership??

[adopted scouser]

Are you sure Jim? I think you need to look up 'hypocrite' in a dictionary. You appear to be unclear about the meaning of the word.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article7078846.ece

In 2004 he (Podger Prescott) railed against the blue-blooded aristocrats, telling a Labour party regional conference: “Now is the time to rid ourselves of the remaining rump of hereditaries in the Lords. They are an offence against democracy.”

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/columnists/reade/2010/06/03/house-of-vermin-115875-22305877/

Podger..... "vermin to ermine"

You two don't appear to like the 'All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others' quote so how about applying this to your heroes.......

"No question now, what had happened to the faces of the pigs. The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which."

Animal Farm (George Orwell)

Anyway Lord Two Jags of Podgerville is not alone in his greed is he? How about this lot of Champagne socialists having their snouts in out trough? http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/blackburndarwenhyndburnribble/8207878.__200k_in____golden_goodbyes____to_former_East_Lancs_MPs/

At least two of those are breezing straight into well paid jobs on the back of their parliamentary contacts, yet they will still grab the golden handshakes for all they are worth. Would you care to comment on the shysters?

Oh and btw Jim I make no comment on people wanting to be wealthy cos I guess we all do but on the subject of Champagne Socialists I'd imagine that by now Teflon Tony is worth more than the entire Tory front bench on his own.

Don't expect a reply Gord, Jimbo and Co can't admit that they all plss in the same pot, and whilst despising the peerage to gain favour from the great unwashed, doff their cap as soon as that Ermine robe is offered.

It's embarrassing really.

The people's flag is palest pink,

It's not as red as people think

The working class can kiss my A**

I've got the foreman's job at last

[thenodrog]

Don't expect a reply Gord, Jimbo and Co can't admit that they all plss in the same pot, and whilst despising the peerage to gain favour from the great unwashed, doff their cap as soon as that Ermine robe is offered.

It's embarrassing really.

I don't expect a reply at all AS. Most on here will know well Jims overt weakness, when he's beaten bang to rights he never ever responds. He simply cannot face up to adversity, he just goes and licks his wounds until his spirit recovers and his skewed resolve returns.

However I take great pleasure from knowing that he will have read and re-read every word in much discomfort.

[broadsword]

Jim either responds with more skewed rhetoric or he just ignores the points raised.

Incredibly biased politically, of course. He'd rather stand up for his party affiliations than see things as they are. I think he takes some sort of malevolent glee in it all.

[adopted scouser]

Not strictly related I suppose but Peter Hitchen on great form here.

Even sticks up for the railways Jim.

[Sandiway Blue]

I don't expect a reply at all AS. Most on here will know well Jims overt weakness, when he's beaten bang to rights he never ever responds. He simply cannot face up to adversity, he just goes and licks his wounds until his spirit recovers and his skewed resolve returns.

However I take great pleasure from knowing that he will have read and re-read every word in much discomfort.

Indeed,as much as Jim criticises the conservative front bench for their wealth,he failed to mention how much the last ELECTED loony leader is worth.And the majority of his wealth since is gained from prostituting himself to any mug thats willing to pay him above a 6 figure sum.

Hypocrisy at its best.....

[Billy Castell]

Is he the one who is the fish-faced, super-right wing sack of crap that wants to be Thatcher's gimp, and send all unemployed people to gas chambers?

There are two Hitchens who are brothers aren't there? And don't they have very different poltical and social views?

As for Jim, he really should take note of the following Bill Hicks quote:

I think the puppet on the right shares my beliefs"

"I think the puppet on the left is more to my liking"

"Hey, wait! There's one guy holding up both puppets"

Labour are just the Conservatives with more layers magagement and the related jargon. Labour couldn't give a flying crap about the 'working man' unless there is an election on. Then they hastily find a red flag, and bang on about how the Tories are all posh fox hunting types.

[modes98]

Pathetic isn't it ? If they had any conviction they would turn it down.

Socialists, all equal ? Some a lot more 'equal' than others

No not really.

The idea is that both the Lords and Commons are to become more representive of the people they serve. So having people like Lord Prescott in there is perfectly fine. Maybe we should just go back to having the old system whereby those with the biggest area of land look after themselves?

Isn't the dude who funds the Labour Party more wealthy than Abramovich? So Mr Roversmum tells me and he is pretty well up on politics.

I doubt it. Labour have put my donation up twice without telling me and David Milliband was on the old e-mails last week asking me to fund a TV advert or something. Labour don't have the same access to funds as the Tories. Some commentators were saying they would have really struggled to fund a 2nd election campaign in October.

Is it about 4 weeks of Tory/Liberal Government and we've already had mumblings of Motorways being sold off to cut national debt. I suppose my road tax would decrease as I have to pay toll fees to use the M6? Mmm not bloody likely!

Woman in the offices son has had his Police training delayed by a year, because they don't want to take on new coppers at the moment.

Fun times!

[broadsword]

No not really.

The idea is that both the Lords and Commons are to become more representive of the people they serve. So having people like Lord Prescott in there is perfectly fine. Maybe we should just go back to having the old system whereby those with the biggest area of land look after themselves?

How is John Prescott representative of the people he serves?

He mangles his words, screws his secretary behind his wife's back, doesn't have the composure to take an attack from a member of the public and lives in a house worth £600k.

He might've been elected as an MP, but he has no mandate from the people to occupy the upper house. He's no more a man of the people than a hereditary peer.