[Archived] Summer Transfer Topic

[BuckyRover]

insiderover

Did you come up with that name after you had heard your "news"?

[beerwins]

insiderover

Did you come up with that name after you had heard your "news"?

Well he joined in 08 so I guess the news would be old news by now.

[Tim Southampton Rover]

insiderover,

Do you have information relating to Big Sam's future at Rovers?

[Will]

Brilliant, this topic finally got interesting, more pictures of scantly clad women i say !!!

[Grez]

I think it's unfair to refer to himself as a muppet .... Attention seeker maybe but not a muppet. : )

[G Somerset Rover]

Bucky etc - lay off Insiderover. The guy is a big Rovers fan who does have loads of contacts in the game. Just because he's not on here every 5 minutes bragging about bits of information doesn't mean you should have a pop.

[insiderover79]

Bucky etc - lay off Insiderover. The guy is a big Rovers fan who does have loads of contacts in the game. Just because he's not on here every 5 minutes bragging about bits of information doesn't mean you should have a pop.

Cheers mate, I will be in touch

[chaddyrovers]

Bucky etc - lay off Insiderover. The guy is a big Rovers fan who does have loads of contacts in the game. Just because he's not on here every 5 minutes bragging about bits of information doesn't mean you should have a pop.

Second that!

[Blackburn Ravers]

Second that!

here here

[alexanders]

Inside rover was actually the first one to tell us that there have been a bust-up between sam and the board. I think he has great contacts in the game and rovers.

[Bennisfromheaven]

Inside Rover, are you telling us your news or will Nicko in the 11 o'clocker??

[braddock]

it was more the fact after one person said one negative thing he seemed to go crazy

he may have inside info but he doesn't understand trolling

[bluebruce]

I'm pretty sure Paffell's post was just a tongue-in-cheek request for the info. I don't see anything unreasonable about him doing that after Insiderover dangled a bit of bait. Which would mean absolutely everything following that post (bar splitscreen's post) looks like overreaction to me.

[shearernewell]

is it santa cruz coming back on loan?

as mentioned on the ever reliant football rumours site.

[insiderover79]

Inside Rover, are you telling us your news or will Nicko in the 11 o'clocker??

Nicko has his own news for you im sure

[nicko]

Had a few problems with computer today, so I will do an early 11 o'clocker in case it goes again.

The target [today] is Jo at Manchester City.

I understand an approach has been made but his future is really down to what his 'handlers' want to do.

City would let him go, but Kia and Pini will probably have the final say.

If Rovers are willing to take him on, pay his wages and any 'extras' then it could happen.

Can be a good player on his day. Can also be totally duff.

Not a Sam player for me, but maybe the appeal of getting the best out of him would work for the manager.

Got to say - like all other recent targets -that this could come as quickly as it goes.

No more news on Utaka. That started in Portsmouth. May be wishful thinking by them. Maybe not. Good player when he is interested.

I think everyone knows that a signing or two is needed right now.

*And by the way inside rover knows his stuff. I would like to thank the person who tipped me off about Jo, but they may wish to be anonymous. Thanks for the lead. I think it checks out from what I have heard.

[ewoodpo]

We have some very sad people on here, InsideRover broke the news about Sam before Nicko.

That to me seems like the guy has contacts and good for him I say.

[PAFELL]

You know what, stick it. I will keep it to myself its people like you that really wind me up.

You have obviously taken offence at my post - without jusification. You are the one who dangled a bit of bait by saying you had news. I did not once say that you did not. I was just hoping that you would tell us the news you had. Maybe I jested a bit, but not to cause offence. Please read your own post. You jested to yourself saying the news you had was 'boring' in comparison to any takeover news.

People like me, you have no idea who I am or I suggest other members on this board. Re-read your own post. My reply was not intended to cause offence.

[Ricky]

At least he's a striker who can put the ball in the net.

Be happier with caicedo to be honest as he can hold the ball up.

[roversfan99]

Jo on loan or permanently? And if the latter would a fee be required? One of the better players linked

[chaddyrovers]

Had a few problems with computer today, so I will do an early 11 o'clocker in case it goes again.

The target [today] is Jo at Manchester City.

I understand an approach has been made but his future is really down to what his 'handlers' want to do.

City would let him go, but Kia and Pini will probably have the final say.

If Rovers are willing to take him on, pay his wages and any 'extras' then it could happen.

Can be a good player on his day. Can also be totally duff.

Not a Sam player for me, but maybe the appeal of getting the best out of him would work for the manager.

Got to say - like all other recent targets -that this could come as quickly as it goes.

No more news on Utaka. That started in Portsmouth. May be wishful thinking by them. Maybe not. Good player when he is interested.

I think everyone knows that a signing or two is needed right now.

*And by the way inside rover knows his stuff. I would like to thank the person who tipped me off about Jo, but they may wish to be anonymous. Thanks for the lead. I think it checks out from what I have heard.

Would a fee be involve in signing Jo? Or a loan deal? I was just saying today that we should be looking at Jo on a loan deal.

[Tim Southampton Rover]

I expect a lot of other clubs would be interested in taking Jo on loan especially if he isn't getting a squad number.

I'd be happy with the signing on loan. Still think we need a bit more pace in the side though.

[PAFELL]

I'm pretty sure Paffell's post was just a tongue-in-cheek request for the info. I don't see anything unreasonable about him doing that after Insiderover dangled a bit of bait. Which would mean absolutely everything following that post (bar splitscreen's post) looks like overreaction to me.

Thanks it was a tongue in cheek request for the news to be told. I forget that there are some people who have no humour.

[sparkspakespoke]

Jo on loan or permanently? And if the latter would a fee be required? One of the better players linked

Yeah at least he was at one time considered a talent with some potential. Unlike the never beens Benjani and the like.

[nicko]

Jo on loan or permanently? And if the latter would a fee be required? One of the better players linked

I think you can have him on loan, permanent, rent, time-share...he is available...full stop.