1864roverite Posted August 23, 2010 Posted August 23, 2010 I wonder if you misheard him when he actually said we had said Bye Bye !!
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
steo Posted August 25, 2010 Posted August 25, 2010 anyone know any developments on the popov deal or have we turned elsewhere a la denny avdic personally id prefer popov,from what i hear avdic is a finisher but offers little else from play.
roversfan99 Posted August 25, 2010 Posted August 25, 2010 Id prefer both and no Benjani, no doubt itll cost to much though.
steo Posted August 25, 2010 Posted August 25, 2010 It would cost bout 3 and a half million plus add ons maybe if we can shift roberts and rigters we could afford.would be two great bargains but id say fergie wouldn't be pleased because it would mean more competition for mame diouf.
roversfan99 Posted August 25, 2010 Posted August 25, 2010 Dioufs staked a strong claim, and as Popovs not a centre forward(i hear hes more of a second striker) we definetly need a 3rd CF, thus why we are giving Benjani a trial. So getting Avdic would mean 3 Central striker all hungry and eager to impress.
Iceman Posted August 26, 2010 Posted August 26, 2010 would be cracking stuff, if we got both Avdic and Popov could look something like this: Robbo Salgado Samba Nelsen Givet E Diouf/M Diouf Nzonzi MGP Olsson Popov/Avdic Kalinic/Avdic
47er Posted August 26, 2010 Posted August 26, 2010 would be cracking stuff, if we got both Avdic and Popov could look something like this: Robbo Salgado Samba Nelsen Givet E Diouf/M Diouf Nzonzi MGP Olsson Popov/Avdic Kalinic/Avdic Is that 4-5-2 or am I missing something?
Iceman Posted August 26, 2010 Posted August 26, 2010 Is that 4-5-2 or am I missing something? im just using a few scenarios of a line up... you could either have E diouf or M Diouf play down the right, or you could have Popov or Avdic playing behind Kalinic, or alongside him.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.