2k. Posted September 19, 2010 Posted September 19, 2010 Chelsea 4 Blackpool 0 41 minutes played... Assuming the Chelsea players don't lose interest or concentration this could be a premier league record!
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
philipl Posted September 19, 2010 Posted September 19, 2010 As things stand, after 5 games of the new season, Liverpool are 10 points and 23 goals behind Chelsea.
Ossydave Posted September 19, 2010 Posted September 19, 2010 I honestly wouldn't be surprised if we finish above Liverpool
koi Posted September 19, 2010 Posted September 19, 2010 I honestly wouldn't be surprised if we finish above Liverpool I'd be amazed to be honest.
philipl Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 It gets worse for Liverpool: Liverpool co-owner Tom Hicks has been offered a £280m funding package by GSO Capital Partners, a subsidiary of private company Blackstone, which would share control of the club with him, according to Associated Press.
Hughesy Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 Whats worse about that Philip? They get rid of at least 1 of the dodgy geezers then surely?
cn174 Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 Whats worse about that Philip? They get rid of at least 1 of the dodgy geezers then surely? No, he'd be sharing his part, so then there'd be 3 owners. I think.
philipl Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 According to the Telegraph article I posted on this thread previously, the plan would be to sack the board who are sticking up for the club's interests, invest zilch into the club and hope to exit at a profit in about two years' time. All at the cost of replacing Gillett and a big chunk of the RBS loan (not all, but enough to make it powerless) with an American vulture capitalist who most certainly will not have the interests of LFC and its supporters at heart.
Backroom DE. Posted September 20, 2010 Backroom Posted September 20, 2010 I get the feeling Roy is going to rue the day he went to Liverpool. He picked probably the worst time in recent history to manage them, and it looks like the circus that surrounds their boardroom dealings is set to continue for at least another two years. I can understand Roy's decision to go there, but, he's facing an uphill task atm and it doesn't show any signs of getting better. The fans have not taken to him - for some utterly bizarre reason they adore Benitez to the point of heroism. Nobody can match up to "our Rafa" . Not only this but he's inherited a team in decline and it looks increasingly likely that he won't have the money required to build them back into a top four side any time soon. Meanwhile, the two players of genuine quality they do have are currently completely off-form and possibly wanting away (Torres) or are going to be required to basically carry the entire team despite age and injuries slowly beginning to catch up (Gerrard). They'll do well to finish top six this year, imo. I'd fully expect us to take points from them at Ewood.
LeChuck Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 I get the feeling Roy is going to rue the day he went to Liverpool. He picked probably the worst time in recent history to manage them I originally thought that because of the financial side of things, but I've been very surprised out of how much money he's been allowed to spend whilst keeping Torres and Gerrard. Surely they're in big trouble when they miss out on the Champions League again next May? If he does fail I think it'll mainly be of his own making. Meireles and Poulsen look a bit out of their depth at the moment, and Konchesky really isn't good enough to be a Liverpool player. That's a good £20 million worth of players there that haven't improved the team (yet). He's also got to work out how to get Gerrard and Joe Cole into the team in a way that isn't wasting one of them. By purchasing two deeper midfielders he's forced his own hand a little bit, since the best option to me would be Gerrard deeper with Cole behind Torres...but that would mean ditching Meireles or Poulsen.
Backroom DE. Posted September 20, 2010 Backroom Posted September 20, 2010 I originally thought that because of the financial side of things, but I've been very surprised out of how much money he's been allowed to spend whilst keeping Torres and Gerrard. Surely they're in big trouble when they miss out on the Champions League again next May? Didn't the sale of Mascherano (17M) & Riera (4.2M) fund the majority of his buys? At best he can only spend money he first generates from sales. Liverpool's sales thus far exceed their incoming this season. The rest of their transfers have been frees (Cole, Jovanovic, Aurelio ... even Konchesky was a player-swap deal). I think Meireles will prove to be a good buy, but Poulsen and Konchesky are mid-table standard. Jovanovic is yet to impress either. No chance of Liverpool getting 4th this year. I still think they'll be lucky to get 6th.
Sparky Marky Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 He's also got to work out how to get Gerrard and Joe Cole into the team in a way that isn't wasting one of them. By purchasing two deeper midfielders he's forced his own hand a little bit, since the best option to me would be Gerrard deeper with Cole behind Torres...but that would mean ditching Meireles or Poulsen. Can't agree there mate...Gerrard and Torres work well together...yesterday they were miles apart in terms of distance....Liverpool should adopt the two holding mids and let Gerrard go work with torres....Cole will have to be out wide.
LeChuck Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 Didn't the sale of Mascherano (17M) & Riera (4.2M) fund the majority of his buys? At best he can only spend money he first generates from sales. Liverpool's sales thus far exceed their incoming this season. The rest of their transfers have been frees (Cole, Jovanovic, Aurelio ... even Konchesky was a player-swap deal). Those sales did fund the transfers, but don't forget they're dealing with £25 million deficit on last year by finishing outside the top four. I thought that would have to be covered by player sales. I know Cole was technically a 'free' transfer, but he certainly won't be cheap for them. I bet he got a hefty wedge as a signing on fee. Can't agree there mate...Gerrard and Torres work well together...yesterday they were miles apart in terms of distance....Liverpool should adopt the two holding mids and let Gerrard go work with torres....Cole will have to be out wide. I know Gerrard is better further forward, but he's still class in a deeper role. It would be the same role he played for England recently, with Cole in the Rooney 'playmaker' position. Plus Liverpool's chronic lack of pace out wide (notably Kuyt and Jovanovic) is only made worse with Cole out there.
Mattyblue Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 Konchesky 'not good enough for a Liverpool player'. I'm afraid as their team is between 6th and 8th best in the league, he IS good enough for LFC. They have lived off their reputation for long enough, their TEAM is average and are signing players to match.
67splitscreen Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 Granada just reporting Hicks attempt to refinance with Blackstone has been turned down by them. One month to go, surely now the RBS will take control.
S15 Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 Konchesky 'not good enough for a Liverpool player'. I'm afraid as their team is between 6th and 8th best in the league, he IS good enough for LFC. They have lived off their reputation for long enough, their TEAM is average and are signing players to match. No. Their team is one of the best four, their squad however...
thenodrog Posted September 20, 2010 Posted September 20, 2010 ......I can understand Roy's decision to go there, but, he's facing an uphill task atm and it doesn't show any signs of getting better. ........... Not only this but he's inherited a team in decline and it looks increasingly likely that he won't have the money required to build them back into a top four side any time soon. Meanwhile, the two players of genuine quality they do have are currently completely off-form (Kevin Davies) and possibly wanting away (Le saux) or are going to be required to basically carry the entire team despite age and injuries slowly beginning to catch up (Sherwood). Spooky huh?
Backroom DE. Posted September 20, 2010 Backroom Posted September 20, 2010 An interesting comparison 'Drog... he took over us when we were beginning to fall from grace (well, we'd already begun our fall but had no idea of the sharp descent that was to follow), and arguably Liverpool are in a similar position now. No chance of them going down unfortunately, but unless their boardroom issues are resolved I see tough times ahead for the scousers.
Iceman Posted September 21, 2010 Posted September 21, 2010 they have so much debt, yet they stil need to fuel their hunger with over rated signings. what is happening to the Liverpool academy?
T4E Posted September 21, 2010 Posted September 21, 2010 No. Their team is one of the best four, their squad however... I can't say I agree with that. Their first 11 is inferior to that of Chelsea, United, Arsenal, Spurs and City. I would say it's on a par with Villa.
Doaksie Posted September 21, 2010 Posted September 21, 2010 I can't say I agree with that. Their first 11 is inferior to that of Chelsea, United, Arsenal, Spurs and City. I would say it's on a par with Villa. I would say the fact that 3 of this season's Liverpool regular midfielders have been recent acquisitions (Cole, and in particular Poulson and Meireles), it will be Christmas before they gather some semblance of a coherent side. Maxi hasn't exactly set the world alight yet either. Top 6 would be a good season for them (not that their fans would admit to that).
ffan Posted September 21, 2010 Posted September 21, 2010 Stoke adopted Rovers tactics of kicking the life out of Dembele, worked as well as he is injured. We are so f***ed
brian_gallagher85 Posted September 21, 2010 Posted September 21, 2010 Either way you need a new keeper asap
BuckyRover Posted September 21, 2010 Posted September 21, 2010 It's my fault. I put Zamora in my fantasy team, he lasted one half so I replaced him with Dembele. My bad
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.