This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
sweet Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 Nicko seems to think he's going to spurs who's bid was 2m. So Adam price is 4-5m by his logic, not 7.5m
Stuart Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 Jones is managed by SEM/KENTARO too? No but Jermaine Jones is an anagram of Jerome Anderson
BangkokRover Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 Don't worry we will not sign him. As soon as other teams came in for him it was game over for Rovers. I am not being negative that's just my honest opinion.
Fylde Coast Fan Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 Nicko seems to think he's going to spurs who's bid was 2m. So Adam price is 4-5m by his logic, not 7.5m Spurs bid was rejected though at 2, Chelsea's at 3 was accepted. So Everton's price for him is 3m, which makes it 6-7.5 for Adam. I've suspected it'll be 6.5 since the story came up though.
Hughesy Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 I am not being negative . Theres a first then! Question for all - Charlie Adam @ £7.5m - leave or snap him up?
Steve Moss Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 Question for all - Charlie Adam @ £7.5m - leave or snap him up? Leave.
BangkokRover Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 Well has anyone been impressed by Venkey's in this transfer window?
BuckyRover Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 He will still be at Blackpool on Feb 1st. I dont think anyone will pay that much. He's had 5 months at the top level and only has 18 months left on his contract. No need to rush.
rovers1993 Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 according to espanyol's sporting director we have had a bid rejected for pablo osvaldo along with fulham's bid as well... venky's aren't so cheap are they?
cruz Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 Theres a first then! Question for all - Charlie Adam @ £7.5m - leave or snap him up? At £6.5m I'd have to do a Play your Cards Right and say Gambull!!!!!!!
BuckyRover Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 He will still be at Blackpool on Feb 1st. I dont think anyone will pay that much. He's had 5 months at the top level and only has 18 months left on his contract. No need to rush.
cruz Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 Well has anyone been impressed by Venkey's in this transfer window? It's not Venkys chasing the players. Everyones favourite Michael Laudrup knocker backer John Williams is blundering about behind the scenes doing the ahem! deals
Gally Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 Theres a first then! Question for all - Charlie Adam @ £7.5m - leave or snap him up? Thats very steep for a player that would still be a gamble. The boy's obviously talented, you could see that he had quality at Rangers, but he's only had half a season at the top level.
Hughesy Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 Well has anyone been impressed by Venkey's in this transfer window? Realistically? RSC in for free Jones in for free later today Rochina from Barca more or less complete Larsson set up for summer Its ok saying 'in the pipeline' - but what Nicko says usually happens with Rovers. When was the last time we added 4 players of that ability in HALF a window?
Teacup Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 Question for all - Charlie Adam @ £7.5m - leave or snap him up? Seems a bit pricey at that. He looks a very good player don't get me wrong, but I think a lot of the squad at Blackpool are running on overdrive because of their underdog status and the way Holloway boosts morale.
AJW Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 At £7.5m your getting into Michael Carrick territory , i know Nicko dismissed that rumour but at that kind of money its Carrick all the way for me
mark1875 Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 Well has anyone been impressed by Venkey's in this transfer window? ask me on February the 1st and i will answer this. Its not even half way through yet - so let's not make judgements
dj54nna Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 It's not Venkys chasing the players. Everyones favourite Michael Laudrup knocker backer John Williams is blundering about behind the scenes doing the ahem! deals Didn't Laudrup decide we weren't for him? Mostly because of our totally non-existent budget?
BangkokRover Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 Realistically? RSC in for free Jones in for free later today Rochina from Barca more or less complete Larsson set up for summer Its ok saying 'in the pipeline' - but what Nicko says usually happens with Rovers. When was the last time we added 4 players of that ability in HALF a window? RSC If he can stay fit he should be a good signing. If he is injured complete and utter waste of money. Jones If he makes an effort he could be good if he walks around like a big time Charlie completely useless. Rochina I like this one as its a young player should be a good technical player. Of course this is gamble as it is for all young players. Larsson Has he been signed yet?
philipl Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 Didn't Laudrup decide we weren't for him? Mostly because of our totally non-existent budget? No, he didn't get the chance to discuss those matters- we plumped for Ince. I see Hughesy is getting carried away again. It is just conceivable that someone would pay £7.5m for Adam but it is not going to be Rovers. I'd hate to think what our accounts will look like if Venky's are willing to do something like that.
Blackburn Ravers Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 Didn't Laudrup decide we weren't for him? Mostly because of our totally non-existent budget? was it not the clause in the contract allowing him to go to a "bigger" club if one came in for him, or he wanted one in or summat like that,
mark1875 Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 Didn't Laudrup decide we weren't for him? Mostly because of our totally non-existent budget? that is how I seem to remember it edit: BlackburnRavers.com is correct. he wanted a clause!
BangkokRover Posted January 14, 2011 Posted January 14, 2011 Didn't Laudrup decide we weren't for him? Mostly because of our totally non-existent budget? I thought it was due to exit clauses Laudrup wanted in his contract?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.