Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Wrestling Entertainment - we know, you don't have to tell us!


Recommended Posts

  • Backroom

I thought the documentary was a good general overview for casual fans, albeit there was nothing new there if you've been following the business regularly. It did a good job of chronicling all the key events, although it was very much the WWE-version of history which isn't the entire truth.

Vince largely came across as an unlikable, arrogant sociopath who is either very comfortable with lying or outright delusional. One imagines if the scandals hadn't come out, the documentary would have been very different. Probably the weirdest part to me was Vince contending that Undertaker never had a concussion during the Lesnar match and was just "traumatized" by the streak being ended. Vince went to the hospital with him ffs, he knows full well that Taker had a concussion. I have no idea what he gets out of pretending otherwise, especially when Calloway has been his most loyal soldier for decades.

I think for more hardcore fans the hype wasn't justified, but maybe for casuals it was. Netflix being the imminent home of WWE obviously meant the documentary was never going to go too deep, but it certainly went harder than it would have when it was originally scheduled to be released pre-pandemic.

Most of the talking heads were pretty pointless and had little to add. Hogan was his usual bullshitting self. Pritchard knows where his bread is buttered and behaved accordingly. The past and present wrestlers were largely reduced to vanilla soundbites.

I'd say Shane came out of the series looking the best - he was portrayed in a really sympathetic manner. Heyman was as always very captivating when on camera. Tony Atlas was the most honest and transparent, to the point of absolute bluntness. I can only imagine what was left on the cutting room floor from his interviews. Meltzer came across well - balanced and knowledgeable.

Edited by DE.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Backroom

I was slightly baffled by Stone Cold’s insistence that CTE doesn’t exist. But when he qualified it with ‘if you’re getting concussions you’re not wrestling properly or safely’, I sort of understand why he’d say it.

Basically avoid CTE by avoiding head trauma.

As an FYI, I’ve gone completely off Hogan. But have to say my favourite pop when I was 12 was when Hogan came back as Mr America. That pop with the original music was amazing.

Edited by Mike E
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Backroom

I mean, yeah, in an ideal world you wrestle safe without getting head trauma - but I don't believe for a second that Austin didn't have at least half a dozen concussions in his career, if not more. Sometimes it's nothing you do - if you get put in there with someone green, mistakes can happen. Look at Bret Hart. One of the safest workers of all time, but one kick to the head from Goldberg and that was his career ruined.

It was weird because the way Austin phrased it was like CTE doesn't exist, when it clearly does. Maybe it was just bad wording on his part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, DE. said:

I thought the documentary was a good general overview for casual fans, albeit there was nothing new there if you've been following the business regularly

I haven't properly follow WWE for many of years. as a Child I was hook on it and I remember playing the WWF Computer game or the action figures like Hulk Hogan and The Ultimate Warrior. 

I stop watching just after Wrestlemania 9 then starting watching back in December 1999 for a few years before stop wacthing around 2006. Since then I haven't followed it since. I have no idea who the wrestlers are now in WWE or who runs it. 

I watched the first 2 episodes of the Mr McMahon's documentary 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Backroom

I'm not really a fan of the current product, across all the American companies, but I keep up on the backstage stuff and general news. I started with watching WCW in 1996, then WCW and WWE from 1998 to 2001. 

Once WCW folded in 2001 I pretty much stopped watching regularly. Started watching again in 2005 because some work colleagues were really into it, ordered all the PPVs, etc... so it was mainly a social thing. I stopped watching WWE again around... 2007 I guess? I'd started watching TNA though and more or less followed that weekly until 2013. Used to catch it on Challenge, if memory serves. 

Had another break, then got back into WWE via the post-draft Smackdown in 2016. That was a fantastic show for 6-7 months. 

I watched WWE somewhat begrudgingly during 2018 and 2019, although typically just in the background whilst I was doing other things. AEW came along and I really enjoyed their product for a couple of years. Lost interest rapidly after they plastered ROH all over their shows, and CM Punk has his initial falling out with the Bucks. I still catch some AEW PPVs by haven't watched any of their TV in nearly 2 years now. 

Haven't watched WWE TV regularly for years now either. Occasionally catch one of the big PPVs but that's about it. 

So yeah, I've been an on and off viewer over the years, and even when not watching tend to keep up on the backstage stuff via Reddit and the Observer. I'm currently very much in an off period, although I could still watch classic shows and enjoy them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Backroom

The product has definitely undergone a radical change since the late 80s and early 90s. Back then it was a combination of spectacle and star-power. Larger-than-life characters playing out fairly straightforward storylines rooted in classic archetypes and, indeed, stereotypes.

Nowadays the spectacle remains - in fact it's even larger on a regular basis than ever - but there is much more emphasis placed on work rate in both of the biggest US companies - WWE & AEW. You can't really get away with just being a gimmick anymore, you've gotta be very solid on fundamentals as well. WWE is pretty good with storylines these days, AEW less so, but ultimately not too much has changed in that regard. The main difference is that both companies lean far more into the adult demographic these days, which was a shift that begun in earnest during the Monday Night Wars era of the mid-to-late 90s.

WWE moved back into a more kid-friendly direction from 2007, whilst AEW has always been aimed more towards adults. Nowadays WWE tries to combine both an adult-orientated and kid-friendly product, and I'd say does so more successfully than in any other period in wrestling history. I may not have much interest in the product these days, but from an objective standpoint I have to give WWE and Triple H props for delivering a show that can appeal to a very wide audience range without upsetting anyone.

Probably the biggest difference between the older days and now is simply the sheer amount of content that's churned out by companies, particularly in the US. WWE has a huge amount of programming available, and so does AEW. It's arguably a bit overwhelming if you're coming in as a more casual fan. Back in the day WWE had 1 hour of Raw and then four PPVs each year. Everything else was untelevised house shows or syndicated programming, most of which was squash matches or recaps. In modern times you've got 3 hours of Raw, 2 hours of Smackdown (soon to be 3 hours as well, reportedly) plus a PPV (or PLE as they are now called) every month - which regularly go for 4 hours and Summerslam is now a two night event alongside WrestleMania. It's a lot to handle if you're coming in cold.

The Bloodline storyline WWE produced was admittedly one of the best angles ever produced, albeit imo dragged out a bit too long with too many false finishes. It didn't pull me back in to watching full shows, but I did watch all of those segments up until the WM where Roman beat Cody, at which point I tuned out. I tuned back into the Bloodline segments for this year's WM, but again, not the full shows, and stopped watching afterwards entirely.

I still catch the big AEW PPVs and generally enjoy them, but they never make me want to watch the TV product.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.