Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

[Archived] Other premier league 2011-12


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

And we won it with the 3 foreigner rule in place! Keep the prem title to a minimum of winners! Come on Utd!

Edit: I think the 3 foreigner rule was in place, (poss champs league) but I may have had a senior moment there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never , I hate the Red Rats.

This, I can't stand how they're acting like the righteous and just owners of the Premier League who are bravely standing up against the evil, money-spending Manchester City. I Man United are spending disgusting amounts of money on their team as well, people just don't notice because they've been doing so for decades. Rubbish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

City supporters are soppy aren't they?

Cannot remember tears at Ewood when they came here and beat us 3-2 putting a dent in our hopes in our Championship-winning season.

Anyway, City fans needn't worry- we are going to do the double over their red neighbours this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't you think this title race is similar to 1995 ? United vs .new club with money ? So much animosity to United but the league doesn't lie, they're at the top because they are the best, no ?

City supporters are soppy aren't they?

Cannot remember tears at Ewood when they came here and beat us 3-2 putting a dent in our hopes in our Championship-winning season.

Anyway, City fans needn't worry- we are going to do the double over their red neighbours this season.

Altrincham ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chelsea home and Stoke and Arsenal away are 3 of City's 4 next fixtures.

Despite my brigado about us doing the double, United's next three away fixtures are Wolves, Rovers and Wigan! Looking at the United run in, it is quite easy to see them winning every game except the Manchester derby fixture.

City will be doing well to be only 3 points behind their neighbours by the time they meet in the Council House on 30 April.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This, I can't stand how they're acting like the righteous and just owners of the Premier League who are bravely standing up against the evil, money-spending Manchester City. I Man United are spending disgusting amounts of money on their team as well, people just don't notice because they've been doing so for decades. Rubbish.

They always have and always will be arse-licked by the media, It's just one of the many reasons why I detest them, probably as much as the Dingles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Backroom

Don't really think it's fair to compare City to us. Yes we spent a lot building up to the 94/95 season but our spending was bankrolled by a local fan of the club, not a middle-eastern bloke needing a new toy to play with.

Also, in the 94/95 season Utd spent practically the same as us if not more, didn't they?

Edit: They spent 8.25M and we spent £1.8M in 94/95.

We admittedly spent a lot in 93/94 (although the website counts Sutton as 93/94, I thought he was bought at the start of the 94/95 season?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't really think it's fair to compare City to us. Yes we spent a lot during the 94/95 season but our spending was bankrolled by a local fan of the club, not a middle-eastern bloke needing a new toy to play with.

Also, in the 94/95 season Utd spent practically the same as us if not more, didn't they?

I believe Utd did spend more that year.

There is no comparison. We made astute signings with our money, we didn't pay through the nose like City have done by trying to put together an all-star side.

Case in point:

Shearer

Bought for £3.3m. Sold for £15m.

Robinho

Bought for £32.5m. Sold for £15m.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Backroom

Sorry Toppers, edited my post after a quick bit of research :P

Overall United had a decent net spend to be fair to them. But we were building a team from a lower division to compete in the top league so it's no surprise we had to spend more. As you say, we spent very wisely on decent players, not superstar names.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe Utd did spend more that year.

There is no comparison. We made astute signings with our money, we didn't pay through the nose like City have done by trying to put together an all-star side.

Case in point:

Shearer

Bought for £3.3m. Sold for £15m.

Robinho

Bought for £32.5m. Sold for £15m.

Now that's nice to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe Utd did spend more that year.

There is no comparison. We made astute signings with our money, we didn't pay through the nose like City have done by trying to put together an all-star side.

Case in point:

Shearer

Bought for £3.3m. Sold for £15m.

Robinho

Bought for £32.5m. Sold for £15m.

It is no good comparing centre forwards ...Because to mind Alan Shearer is the greatest centre forward Rovers ,England and the premier league have ever had !!!

Those seasons he had in a Blue n'white shirt , I will cherish until the day I die !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Putting it into context we broke the British transfer record twice with Shearer and then Sutton, we also broke the transfer record for a British goalkeeper, so we were spending in excess of most teams in the country.

Man City are outspending most teams at the moment but compared to Chelsea or Man United how far are they? I would say we got more value for money but how good is Toure at 15 million or Joe Hart at 200k or Aguero at 30 million?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Announcements

  • You can now add BlueSky, Mastodon and X accounts to your BRFCS Profile.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.