Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

[Archived] Rumour: Venky's To Sell?


Recommended Posts

Do you believe it is "better for the club" to start off a panic then allow an hysterical discussion, largely consisting of anti-owner comments of varying intensity, on a forum which the owners allegedly read? Rather than offer some limited details with sources removed?

(edit to add speech marks)

We did consider that question for quite some time. But we saw it was already being discussed elsewhere and figured it was worth discussing here (but not yet news worthy).

confused as to why you would start a thread on this issue, when you are unwilling to say any sources or any FACTS to me it looks to me that people like to act in the know !!!! :closedeyes:

I'm getting tired of explaining this. Nobody involved with the first post in this thread is directly involved with any hypothetical discussion between Venky's and potential buyers, so we can't report and FACTS. All we can do is report what rumors we're hearing from reputable sources. We outlined this at the start of this and it's been reiterated ad infinitum.

The other option is we ignore it, wait for somebody else to post, then be accused yet again of being on Venky's payroll and trying to bury news. As always, damned if we do, damned if we don't.

i think K&N are poopstairing cos there best "sources" have gone cold on them due to the leaked list debacle.

Whilst somebody will trot out the "Nicko is just trying to sell newspapers" line (despite Nicko repeatedly saying there is no reportable story here yet) that last thing we want and need is more traffic and more attention.

I'm begining to understand how Alan feels, we try to keep people informed, we try not to keep these rumors between little cliques who communicate via PM and when we do, we get lambasted for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Pretty sure venky's will already know about all this coming out. They have not come out and said anything before, why would they now. If there is a buyer, the buyer will want it quiet and out of the papers. As will venky's. If This is not the case, will they want the publicity, that will still come out about not having much money, and all the promises they cane out with at the start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this is all true it is a monumental F*** up by all parties involved in the sale & buying of the club!!

How could Venkys get less than a year into their ownership of the club, having not really spent much in terms of buying players & then decide it wasnt for them!?!?!

I mean these are supposed to be smart business men

Kentaro & SEM are supposed to be footballing super agents

& the walker trust were supposed to be...... well, trusted with the well being of the club!?!?!

I dont get the venkys selling angle, it doesnt make sence!!

maybe 3 years down the line, £100million spent & only a top 12 finish to show for it would make them change their mind

These guys were supposed have had this well thought through & a long term plan was in place!!

Im just baffled by the whole thing!!!

And rip the guts out of the club while they were at it, making it much more difficult to get on track again.IF they are selling of course!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is bordering on farcical. So many people RAGING who aren't actually reading. I actually find the fact we're being accused of peddling a lie to intentionally damage the club very very insulting.

If everything we mentioned had to be backed up with sources and proof, the transfer section wouldn't have any mention of Baez and Andersen, let alone the other 50 odd players the national press have linked us to WITHOUT NAMING THEIR SOURCES ! (Oooh, this caps lark does make you feel better). Are we damaging the club by peddling these tabloid lies designed to make the club look like liars if they only sign 2 of the 50? No, of course not.

If we'd reported this as NEWS in the NEWS section, rather than plainly labelling it as rumour in a discussion are, I could see some of you may have a point. But we didn't. We took the responsible route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm begining to understand how Alan feels, we try to keep people informed, we try not to keep these rumors between little cliques who communicate via PM and when we do, we get lambasted for it.

Only by a minority, which is indicitive of life in general.

Don't let the buggers grind you down.

I think most people appreciate the hard work that you and the rest of the admin/mods put in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you really believe that. since march.. and we are now in july and this supposedly same rumour has just come out! :unsure:

its easy to latch onto anything after the fact! you cant be that stupid to be seduced by those attention seekers who just want to get on their soapbox and all so they can appear important and 'in the know' ! can you ?

You mean Glenn and Kamy? :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only by a minority, which is indicitive of life in general.

Don't let the buggers grind you down.

I think most people appreciate the hard work that you and the rest of the admin/mods put in.

Agreed.

As for the bickering with people like Zacariasyrusi - just give it a rest for one thread, will you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When and how does the TV money come through? Don't wanna scare monger but is it theoretically possible that the owners could take the £40m TV money and the Phil Jones fee and sell us for a £1 making around £20m on their original investment?

TV money paid over the course of the year and, especially in Rovers' case, substantial amounts of it spent on the running costs of the club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is bordering on farcical. So many people RAGING who aren't actually reading. I actually find the fact we're being accused of peddling a lie to intentionally damage the club very very insulting.

If everything we mentioned had to be backed up with sources and proof, the transfer section wouldn't have any mention of Baez and Andersen, let alone the other 50 odd players the national press have linked us to WITHOUT NAMING THEIR SOURCES ! (Oooh, this caps lark does make you feel better). Are we damaging the club by peddling these tabloid lies designed to make the club look like liars if they only sign 2 of the 50? No, of course not.

If we'd reported this as NEWS in the NEWS section, rather than plainly labelling it as rumour in a discussion are, I could see some of you may have a point. But we didn't. We took the responsible route.

You should know what damage even a word can do round here. Make your job a little easier and don't tell people whether it's rumour or true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When and how does the TV money come through? Don't wanna scare monger but is it theoretically possible that the owners could take the £40m TV money and the Phil Jones fee and sell us for a £1 making around £20m on their original investment?

No its released in stages

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely people can see that by putting the rumour on here it will be picked up by other internet sites and eventually the national press and what started off as an unsubstantiated rumour will be treated as fact

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely people can see that by putting the rumour on here it will be picked up by other internet sites and eventually the national press and what started off as an unsubstantiated rumour will be treated as fact

Really? Good show.

I have a twenty inch penis.

Bring on the ladies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know how many times I've said this, but I am not Venkys's PR man. I don't work for Venkys. Hell, I don't work for anybody because I'm still in college! Not even a part-time job, for that matter. Unless you count drawing Japanese comics as a job.

I believe you as I have no reason not to.

But to judge them on rumors and hearsay might be premature - certainly there is no smoke without fire, but you can mistake steam for smoke.

Well said.

joe blue white, why are you having a go at alan? he is as sick about this situation as we are. He is only reporting other people's reaction, it doesnt mean he is laughing with them.

Agreed. Alan is a valuable poster who is more often correct than not. I also enjoy his posts (mostly) and his Mirror articles (online). Though I think it a fair characterization that he can act the drama queen on occassion.

I don't believe they are trying to sell, If that was the case they would have sold Samba already and pocketed the money, I also don't think they have come to the conclusion to sell the club only a month after trying to break the bank to keep Phil Jones. This is only based on my logic and obviously not on any insider information.

One flaw in your scenario scenario. Samba's contract is an asset. If I were a buyer I would likely protest the stripping of the club prior to sale and, if it did not end, withdraw my bid.

Kind of like a homeowner ripping out the pool with an offer on the table. The prospective buyer might take offense.

Three possible scenarios

Logical:

1) Venkys have realised they cannot fund their intentioned assault on the top 6 and have been trying to secure a 'partner' who will add extra funding to the project. This would possibly explain both the shift in transfer kitty and people being approached to invest (as opposed to buy out) which triggers the 'for sale' rumours.

Culture:

2) IF the Venkys were selling - which would result in a HUGE loss of face and credibility both personally and globally to their core business. Is it possible that another wealthy Asian family might take a punt on the club, just to damage the Rao's pride even further?

Pie in the sky:

3) In the next 14 days our overlords pull off the signings of Witsel, Fabiano, Onuha and Bentley and everything in the Venky garden is rosy once more...

I vote 3. I don't think Venkys are quitters. They've made mistakes, yes. But I don't see them cutting and running.

Though it may explain their, in my opinion, fanatical attachment to Kean. Hypothetically, they don't want to buy him out and would prefer his contract become the new owners issues to deal with.

If another Ali Syed character rode over the horizon, would Venky's think twice about selling to them? There wouldn't be any comebacks on Venky's, would there?

I assume if venkys want to sell the potential buyers won't need to jump through the walker trusts tight demands ? Just the sloppy premier league ones, thus leaving us at the mercy of the gods.

I don't know. Normally you can only sell the rights you have. So if you don't have the right to remove Jack Walker's statute, for example, you can't sell it. And if you are obligated to pay money, you can't escape the promise you made to the original owner (unless a separate deal is entered into with the original owner).

Hypotethetically, if I were Venkys and wanted to escape potential liability to the Walker Trust, the first thing I would do is pay off the debt. The Phil Jones money should cover most of it. It might even make the club a more attractive asset to a potential buyer.

You post insulting stuff on this web site, then it might get deleted. We all subscribe to the same rules. I don't see why you might get special rights to insult people.

Something I think Alan Nixon sometimes forgets, unfortunately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glenn don't let the buggers grind you down me & others appreciate the work you,Kamy & Nicko do to find out things and are appreciative of the job you do. Philipl you say you hope this rumour is true and they sell I suppose you will still think it was a good idea to sell when we are relegated next season also if there was a new owner coming in think how much it would put us back they would have to find a sponsor players would need to be brought in with not long left in the transfer window the original plans would have to be scrapped about branding in India we would have to prove ourselves all over again & new marketing strategies would need to be implemented & then most importantly of all new owners bring new ideas certain staff jobs would be at risk people like P.Hunt would be wondering if he still would have a job it would create so much turmoil we would definitely be guaranteed relegation candidates with noc chance of ever recovering I firmly agree with Nicko we need Venkys to stay on board for the long term deliver on the promises that are still achievable pull their fingers out make some signings & bring some stability to the club otherwise in the turmoil players like Chris Samba will walk away far too easily we need them to stick to their pronises instead of hoping they do a runner.

Rant Over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I notice that a post has been deleted.

Said that the next time that happens would be the last.

Bye.

Epitaph time? It's late but I'll give it a go .....

This board created a monster some time past.

Sometimes truth came first and sometimes last.

A preening peacock when right, a spiteful curmudgeon when wrong.

11 O Clockers always worth reading but often the wait was just too long.

Last January taking the 30 pieces of silver left his followers in shock.

But at the end of the day please remember he was never Rovers proper... he was just a fat little jock.

:P

btw Glenn .... Who was the Man who shot Liberty ALANce?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Announcements

  • You can now add BlueSky, Mastodon and X accounts to your BRFCS Profile.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.