Inta Beaver Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 I'm thinking of smashing in loads of strong sleeping pills enough to see me out for around 36hrs, I bet I wake up and we will have signed....................not a bean.
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
RoverPedro Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 Had a name thrown at me today from a couple of different people suggesting we have an interest now in a Moroccan striker currently plying his trade in North London, I'm trying to chase up if there is any truth in it, but certianly a suprise to see him being linked with Rovers. Chamakh. I wouldnt want him. He missed half of last season through exhaustion. We couldnt afford that risk. Plus would that mean a swap deal involving samba? Hope not.
mjwood00 Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 Anyone know whether the 'superagent' PZ is this Israeli right back's agent per chance??
youandwhosearmy Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 Did anyone ever find out what odds you could get for Dann not signing. If it was 1/12 for him signing, must have been well worthy of a shot...
Mercer Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 I'm thinking of smashing in loads of strong sleeping pills enough to see me out for around 36hrs, I bet I wake up and we will have signed....................not a bean. Think there are many of us in the same place !!! Found it incredulous that we tried to land the Yak, even more incredulous that he turned us down !!! Just about says everything in many ways.
miqaayil Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 Hi new here , Still no word on striker situation ?
Speedie Dived Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 Both Mertesacker and Vermaelen are at least as good, if not better, than Samba, and Koscielny and Djorou are also solid defenders (although they (have) struggle(d) with injuries). Can't see them going for Samba if they get Mertesacker in. Hope I'm not jinxing anything by posting this! Solid defenders? They just got walloped 8-2 with those 2 clowns at the back
farhanology Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 Had a name thrown at me today from a couple of different people suggesting we have an interest now in a Moroccan striker currently plying his trade in North London, I'm trying to chase up if there is any truth in it, but certianly a suprise to see him being linked with Rovers. Is the El Hamadoui link now dead?
chocky Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 Think there are many of us in the same place !!! Found it incredulous that we tried to land the Yak, even more incredulous that he turned us down !!! Just about says everything in many ways. Personally, I think it was B.S...but there is so much out there it'shard to know what may be credible and what is just made up by bored journos..
Hekla Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 Would Chamakh even come to us? I suppose for first team football yes.
steo Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 Had a name thrown at me today from a couple of different people suggesting we have an interest now in a Moroccan striker currently plying his trade in North London, I'm trying to chase up if there is any truth in it, but certianly a suprise to see him being linked with Rovers. surely it can't be Chamakh,arsenal lack strikers would they let him go maybe on loan but not permanently,what a great striker though but lacking in confidence at the mo
T.J.Newton Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 chamakh would be very very good, easily a 15-20 goal striker if he plays all games and gets plenty of chances.
Mercer Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 is chamakh the player nicko is on about? Not a snowball's chance in hell of him joining Rovers with Kean as manager, IMO. Burton's window will be full of bare arses if he does !!!!
Fylde Coast Fan Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 Nicko hinting that Chamakh isn't one of the two names he has, presuming one of them is/was Yak.
Blackburn Ravers Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 Apparently none of either Chamakh or Crouch
Ricky Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 The name Nicko had last night was beckford, surely he didn't have the wrong everton striker as well as the wrong ribeiro??
chaddyrovers Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 chamakh would be very very good, easily a 15-20 goal striker if he plays all games and gets plenty of chances. Chamakh is a very good player in my view. I think he would come to rovers if he get 1st team football. But I will wait and see who we sign by tomorrow at 11pm then judge whether it has been a good transfer window for us or not!!! Only 27 hours and 12 minutes left of it NOW!!!
glen9mullan Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 Apparently none of either Chamakh or Crouch Still trying to get a further confirmation on Chamakh, Nico had no idea on Dann or Yakubu despite me being informed Dann held talks yesterday, and me breaking Yakubu last night. There may be nothing in it, but the source of it was quite strong
roverandout Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 so glen, could we get chamakh and the sexy striker in? or would it be one or the other?
chaddyrovers Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 Apparently none of either Chamakh or Crouch I wouldn't be surprise if it is Bendtner Nicko twiiter feed In past few days u lost Ibi, ignored ElHam, tried for Yak, set up a bizarre move for Dann, now in talks with a top club for .. It is in balance. He was one of two yesterday and today. Mind u there could be more with this mob.
glen9mullan Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 so glen, could we get chamakh and the sexy striker in? or would it be one or the other? Couldnt comment on that as I don't know who Niko is referring to, and i'm still chasing up confirmation on Chamakh. That many names being thrown in melting pot, its hard to work out the enquires from the solid interest
patrickvalery Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 so glen, could we get chamakh and the sexy striker in? or would it be one or the other? Surely he is the sexy striker? Although its hard to tell. He uses too much in the way of hair products for me.
roverandout Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 bendtner is neither sexy or a striker, more of a waste of space, if its him i will pull my hair out did nicko say that the sexy striker was a free transfer? if so, i cant see arsenal letting chamakh go on a free
Saviola786 Posted August 30, 2011 Posted August 30, 2011 http://www.bluekipper.com/players/something_fishy/3185-blackburn_in_for_beckford.html
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.