AspRover Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Impressed by Dann? Are you kidding me? Worst center back at club since Amoruso I'd say. Not only do I see it with my eyes, but the stats prove it too! To be fair in October when that was posted we didn't know that. We just thought he was a bit nervy in his first half-season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Backroom Mike E Posted May 11, 2012 Backroom Share Posted May 11, 2012 One of the oddest rumours I've heard, but that happens with this farce of a club at the moment. Apparently Vukcevic has been 'converted' by some monks who have brainwashed him, he's given away all his worldy possessions and turns up for training in a taxi looking like a tramp. I can only assume it is BS, but I've heard it from 4 people now (none of them know each other, although none of them have any credibility as they think Goodwillie is a superstar). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackson Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Is better, but is not cheepa. Therein lies the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joey_big_nose Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 But I can't fathom why Simon would want to stay given the few games he played... unless lighting strikes from clear blue sky and Kean get replaced with a decent manager. And surely an international player would want to play in the top divisions? He is not going to stay. No chance. As to why he didn't play clearly he had a problem with Kean and Kean with him. He has a a history of disciplinay issues. Nonetheless the buck stops with Kean as whoever we sign with our pitiful transfer budget needs to be made the most of. Kean spectacularly failed to do that. He either got the wrong player or failed to correctly manage the player. Perhaps both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenodrog Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Is better, but is not cheepa. Therein lies the problem. Quoting me again Jackson? Seems you have been reading my little red book again. As for the no show of Simon Vucevic? Who knows whats gone on there. BUT as he is a good player I doubt it's for footballing reasons, I'd wager it'll be for financial ones. Could it be that he's on a 'pay as you play' deal and the obligatory slice of match appearence money hasn't been hitting the Swiss bank account as agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackson Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Quoting me again Jackson? Seems you have been reading my little red book again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rover & Out Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Vukcevic is simply another case of Kean's horrendous mismanagement of players. I can only assume that he is yet another member of the squad who Kean didn't get along with. It would appear to me that anybody who questions Steve Kean or his tactics has been dropped. As a manager, you don't have to be friends with the player to be able to pick him. Rochina and Vukcevic are useful players to have on the bench and arguably should even have got more starts! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puffsan Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 i feel sorry for vukcevic and goodwillie who gets ruined their career here at rovers. Vuckevic impressed me going forward at the games i saw him play earlier in the season and he has the fighter attitude we really could have used during our war vs relegation. Goodwillie has been used wrong or not at all, and i think under a proper manager who would have used him correct he could have been good for us. if vukcevic stays i think he will be v good to have in the championship Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SharrockDownSouth Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 I only saw Vuckcevic in the cameo sub appearance against Arsenal, and even there you could see the potential. A rugged little fighter of a winger who retained possession (Diouf mk2 anyone?). His ostracism is one of the biggest misses of the season imho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenodrog Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 So you obviously don't think it's for murky financial gain by person/persons unnamed then? If not then I think you are being naive. Too many things simply do not add up if you take events at face value. So much does not stack up. This thread contains lots of unanswered questions. http://www.brfcs.co.uk/mb/index.php/topic/26846-is-it-just-me/ I believe that we all need to think outside the box to make sense of it all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby G Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 The fact that another January signing (someone in the aftermath of cutting costs and changing approach to running club) in Marcus Olsson gets regular football and walks into the team when players like Simon dont get a look in is enough to raise alarms. Whoever thinks its for footballing reasons is naive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rover & Out Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 So you obviously don't think it's for murky financial gain by person/persons unnamed then? If not then I think you are being naive. Too many things simply do not add up if you take events at face value. It doesn't matter if he arrived for the financial benefit of individuals or whether it was a personality clash, if you're fighting a relegation battle and you have a quality player at your disposal why not use him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenodrog Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 It doesn't matter if he arrived for the financial benefit of individuals or whether it was a personality clash, if you're fighting a relegation battle and you have a quality player at your disposal why not use him? I give up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shabani Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 The guy has a bit of experience at the highest level, knwos how to play football etc Kean obviously saw him, along with Givet and Salgado as threats to his authority and he was swiftly cast aside to make way for the party liners in the squad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puffsan Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 its really strange. vuckevic should have been used instead of marcus O, formica and even hoilett at times. best case scenario next season? 4-4-2 1.bunn. 2. orr. 4. hanley .5 need to buy one 3. henley/need to buy experienced one 6. Lowe/petrovic 7. vuckevic. 11 marcus olsson/ gamst pedersen 8. formica/dunn 9. goodwillie 10 need to buy one subs: petrovic gamst dunn slew robbie cotton raheem hanley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sharpysharps Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 its really strange. vuckevic should have been used instead of marcus O, formica and even hoilett at times. best case scenario next season? 4-4-2 1.bunn. 2. orr. 4. hanley .5 need to buy one 3. henley/need to buy experienced one 6. Lowe/petrovic 7. vuckevic. 11 marcus olsson/ gamst pedersen 8. formica/dunn 9. goodwillie 10 need to buy one subs: petrovic gamst dunn slew robbie cotton raheem hanley I would expect Huge Fernandez to be pushed into the first team next season. Sounds like a promising player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puffsan Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 it would be really good if 1 or 2 of the academy players could take the step up to championship football. we will probably not go up on 1st try even if venkys invest and sack kean, so would be good if youngster could get some experience Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackson Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 So you obviously don't think it's for murky financial gain by person/persons unnamed then? If not then I think you are being naive. I believe that we all need to think outside the box to make sense of it all. Nope, because obviously the "kidnapped by monks" theory holds more water. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donnermeat Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 I was so excited when we signed this guy, what a disappointment it has been not to see him more often. Disappointment being the theme of the season I know, but still. 0% he will be here next season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparky Marky Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Yep, he'll be gone and playing at a higher level than us. Quality player just mis-managed to death....Kean's a knob. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJW Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 put yourself in his shoes ... would you wanna be here next season?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amo Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Vukcevic is simply another case of Kean's horrendous mismanagement of players. I can only assume that he is yet another member of the squad who Kean didn't get along with. Happened to Kalinic last season as well. He scored two goals at WBA and got sent off. But after that he never got a look in. Now people have their own thoughts on Kalinic but the fact of the matter is he was getting in among the goals and we were hardly blessed with striking options. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattyblue Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Marcus Olsson in, Vukcevic out. If ever there was an example to illustrate that this club is not in the business of trying to win football matches, that is it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backroom Mike E Posted May 11, 2012 Backroom Share Posted May 11, 2012 Nope, because obviously the "kidnapped by monks" theory holds more water. Not that the rumour holds water at all, but it didn't say kidnapped just 'influenced'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAFELL Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 So you obviously don't think it's for murky financial gain by person/persons unnamed then? If not then I think you are being naive. Too many things simply do not add up if you take events at face value. So much does not stack up. This thread contains lots of unanswered questions. http://www.brfcs.co.uk/mb/index.php/topic/26846-is-it-just-me/ I believe that we all need to think outside the box to make sense of it all. I agree. Many things do not stack up. I also believe relegation was done deliberately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.