[Archived] QATAR group bid for Rovers

[PAFELL]

  On 14/11/2011 at 09:48, pick32 said:

Could someone ITK go to an internet cafe or library create a new account and spill the beans? That way it couldn't be trace back to them.

Without evidence - no chance. Leave it to those who know what they are doing. Unless somebody on here is extremely rich, has money to burn, is willing to take the hit and pay all bills - it is a non starter.

[hawkiiz]

  On 14/11/2011 at 09:54, Glenn said:

There are, but via our forums isn't one of them

Out of curiousity, if someone anonymously post it on the official Rovers MB. What would happen?

[pick32]

There is no danger of me doing it no one has has told me any of the rumors and i don't have any intention of trying to find them out.

[booth]

  On 14/11/2011 at 09:44, hawkiiz said:

Post it in the official Rovers MB then. The club would be responsible itself..?

But give people prior notice so that they can screen grab it for evidence before it disappears.

[2PAC 4 Blackburn]

  On 14/11/2011 at 09:48, pick32 said:

Could someone ITK go to an internet cafe or library create a new account and spill the beans? That way it couldn't be trace back to them.

Waste of time, there are plenty of ways to release the info without a trail if you really want. I think the rumour is a load of rubbish hence no one has spilled it. Wikileaks?!! Ha ha.

[steven]

  On 14/11/2011 at 09:19, funny-old-game said:

And me

And me too!

[Billy Castell]

Aha, how about we post it on Burnley websites?

The poster may be in trouble, but at least their websites will be too.

P.S. Wikileaks has gone down.

[pick32]

easiest way would be to go to some public place with internet access create a new email account > tumblr account > create a post explaining everything > share it on social network sites using a new account > delete the email, blog, social networking account. The beauty of the internet is there is no paper trail and it would create a lack of evidence. Also has anyone contacted Panorama about these rumors seems like something they would be interested in.

[hawkiiz]

Write it out as a fictional blog. Make names up, and just tip us to read it.

[steven]

  On 14/11/2011 at 10:12, pick32 said:

easiest way would be to go to some public place with internet access create a new email account > tumblr account > create a post explaining everything > share it on social network sites using a new account > delete the email, blog, social networking account. The beauty of the internet is there is no paper trail and it would create a lack of evidence. Also has anyone contacted Panorama about these rumors seems like something they would be interested in.

Or Henry Winter

[booth]

  On 14/11/2011 at 10:12, hawkiiz said:

Write it out as a fictional blog. Make names up, and just tip us to read it.

This is possibly a very good way of getting around it.

Person A meets Person B.

[KyleBRFC]

Could anyone possibly pm me these accusations? I promise to not to post on here or anything.

Thanks.

[yeti-dog]

  On 14/11/2011 at 09:53, Glenn said:

.... and don't forget, this is all currently unsubstantiated rumor. If us (or any of the press) could prove it, we'd have run it as news. Just because a lot of people know the rumors and believe them, doesn't necessarily mean they are true.

An excellent point Glenn,although listening to some around here this 'rumour' has already morphed into 'truth'.

[Reedy You're A Star]

  On 14/11/2011 at 10:18, booth said:

This is possibly a very good way of getting around it.

Person A meets Person B.

I'd be quite interested to hear the story of Bluetown Rangers and the problems they've had since being taken over by new owners Vega Fisheries..

(all characters and names are entirely fictional and any resemblance to real people or events are entirely coincidental)

[Gogger]

Just when you thought the Venky's couldn't kean it more up.

I don't understand your legal system. You can be prosecuted for a sentence on an Internet forum? True or untrue, just start the post with "I think" and you are in the clear, no?

Or is it just the tabloids over there who has the freedom of speech..

[BiggusLaddus]

Everyone has free speech, but it comes with responsibilities.

If I wrote a piece in your local paper that said "i've heard Gogger messes with children and steals from work" there is a fair chance that would cause you lots of difficulties and you would be well within your rights to sue me.

If I was telling the truth and had hard evidence to back it up I'd be in the clear. If I was just spouting off some rumour that I'd heard you'd win and I'd be in trouble.

[deryck guyler's spoon]

  On 14/11/2011 at 10:34, BiggusLaddus said:

Everyone has free speech, but it comes with responsibilities.

If I wrote a piece in your local paper that said "i've heard Gogger messes with children and steals from work" there is a fair chance that would cause you lots of difficulties and you would be well within your rights to sue me.

If I was telling the truth and had hard evidence to back it up I'd be in the clear. If I was just spouting off some rumour that I'd heard you'd win and I'd be in trouble.

All good points. Points which might suggest that 'certain people' don't have hard evidence?

[onlyonejackwalker]

Curiousity killed the cat. We would all like to be armed with relevant and pertinent information. We ain't going to get it.

[Glenn]

  On 14/11/2011 at 10:12, pick32 said:

easiest way would be to go to some public place with internet access create a new email account > tumblr account > create a post explaining everything > share it on social network sites using a new account > delete the email, blog, social networking account. The beauty of the internet is there is no paper trail and it would create a lack of evidence.

..... and this is why I don't want to get involved. That's not really anonymous at all and plenty of paper trails (cafe receipts, cctv recordings, router logs, tumblr connection logs, browser fingerprints etc ..... very little on the net that gets deleted is really gone).

Look at anonymous and lulzsec. Bright guys that know the tech, know to use somebody else's wifi on vanilla kit via tor and proxies then just dump it somewhere like pastebin. ..... and they still have members getting caught.

Anyway, this probably isn't a discussion for this thread.

[2PAC 4 Blackburn]

I'm happy to stick it on Twitter and take the flack that goes with it, PM me the details and I'll stick it up. If not please don't mention you know things in future but can't say as its boring and pointless even mentioning the fact.

[hawkiiz]

  On 14/11/2011 at 10:26, Gogger said:

Just when you thought the Venky's couldn't kean it more up.

I don't understand your legal system. You can be prosecuted for a sentence on an Internet forum? True or untrue, just start the post with "I think" and you are in the clear, no?

Or is it just the tabloids over there who has the freedom of speech..

It is not very different in Norway, mind you.

[2PAC 4 Blackburn]

Ok I've been sent some info and to be honest it's not a lot more than most know already and have read on the net. The only thing that would ring alarm bells is around SK but I thought it had been discussed before. I will post it on twitter after work tonight, BUT what's the point without proof? I must say I expected more dirt, nevermind.

[Billy Big Pants]

  On 14/11/2011 at 09:13, BuckyRover said:

I would be grateful if you could let me know as well.

Thanks

Likewise if it's not too much trouble.

Thanks

[Puffsan]

Norwegian court and police will never use resources to track who wrote the accusations, and the case will in 99% Of the times be dropped.

I would be happy to post and spread the information when I get it and If it's benefitial to our cause, but the little information I have gotten so far is not of a scale that will cause any impact. I don't really believe we will get anything out of It at this stage.

I also don't belive venkys/ j Anderson reads this forum, and I will guess they have gotten a lot worse accusations on them in their past business life

[Will]

  On 14/11/2011 at 09:23, davulsukur said:

And me

And me