Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

Mauro Formica


patrickvalery

Recommended Posts

Well if we are going to ask which of our saleable players are expendable assets certainly one of Dunn/Rochina/Vukcevic/Formica qualify. Four players for one position. We can shoehorn them onto the wing but they aren’t really wingers. On the face of it losing any of them seems a bad idea – Dunn is in great form, Rochina is exceptionally gifted, Formica is solid with a knack for scoring goals, Vukcevic has only just arrived at the club and is an excellent player if his international appearances are anything to go by.

One of them should go. I would argue losing Formica would not be so bad if we brought good players we did need (defensive midfielders, strikers, fullbacks, right winger).

It would appear that we'll be sacrificing a decent player in order to improve another area on the pitch. If that's the only option open to us then so be it. Out of the 4 above i'd also select Formica but maybe Formica is the one player out of the four that we have actually received an enquiry for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 196
  • Created
  • Last Reply

According to today's LT

Olympiakos are offering £400k loan fee with a agreed price of £2.5m, however Rovers are demanding a written agreement that they have to buy him and for £3.5m in the summer, regardless of our league position.

It also says that Flamengo are now after him too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to today's LT

Olympiakos are offering £400k loan fee with a agreed price of £2.5m, however Rovers are demanding a written agreement that they have to buy him and for £3.5m in the summer, regardless of our league position.

It also says that Flamengo are now after him too.

No said they wanted it to be in writing that they buy him after the loan period if we suffer relegation.

are you stirring trouble?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is also understood that Rovers wanted it in writing that Olympiakos would make it a permanent switch in the summer should the club suffer Premier League relegation.

How can that be read somehow differently than what it says? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's funny when somebody makes several good posts that a few disagree with, then if he misreads something or somebody takes a dislike to the way they said something then their sanity is questioned. Seems fair.

Also, regarding the Philipl outburst, Formica's quotes that I have seen (a week or two ago) suggested it was only the club standing in his way and that he was excited by a move. I won't question your sanity, only your motives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be very annoyed if we let him go. I think he's done well recently. He's not placed with pace, but he works hard, covers a lot of ground, has great technical ability and finally seems to be able to play more consistently at this level. It's a joke that we would have to sell him, to raise funds that are supposed to be there for buying players anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if Rovers were offered £3.5m, it would not cover the substantial agents' fees that have been speculated about by many since this deal was done.

What we do know is that the initial deal took some time to complete and was speculated to be untidy. I wonder if Rovers believe that selling Formica now might just close this book ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if Rovers were offered £3.5m, it would not cover the substantial agents' fees that have been speculated about by many since this deal was done.

What we do know is that the initial deal took some time to complete and was speculated to be untidy. I wonder if Rovers believe that selling Formica now might just close this book ?

I wonder if it's one of the more obvious reasons posted?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop dressing it up Hughesy- he's being forced out.

Also, regarding the Philipl outburst, Formica's quotes that I have seen (a week or two ago) suggested it was only the club standing in his way and that he was excited by a move. I won't question your sanity, only your motives.

I spoke with Nicko yesterday, definitely being pushed from the top, why? he has no idea, only that it doesn't get much higher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if Rovers were offered £3.5m, it would not cover the substantial agents' fees that have been speculated about by many since this deal was done.

The Sporting Intelligence web site guy - who has broken a lot of Rovers related stories - reckoned that the Formica agents fee was only around £200k (if I remember rightly) - it was nowhere near the rumoured millions - or that paid to get Rochina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Sporting Intelligence web site guy - who has broken a lot of Rovers related stories - reckoned that the Formica agents fee was only around £200k (if I remember rightly) - it was nowhere near the rumoured millions - or that paid to get Rochina.

If true, then just where did the missing millions go?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Announcements

  • You can now add BlueSky, Mastodon and X accounts to your BRFCS Profile.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.