martypellowe Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Does anyone have any substance to the rumour that Betfred has suspended paying out for a Spurs victory after the match yesterday? Been seeing a few rumours flying about, anyone have a flutter with them? Wonder how many "shots on target" bets were placed for the match? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Andy Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Even if it's not true, it should be circulated as such until the mud sticks. Works both way, Weaselboy and Agnew. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
martypellowe Posted April 30, 2012 Author Share Posted April 30, 2012 I'd imagine the odds on a team having zero shots all game would be quite high, what with noone having achieved it in 8 years. Still, it's only a rumour, unless someone can confirm Betfred specifically have refused to pay out winning bets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ABBEY Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Ive heard the same thing as well,no idea if its true but it stinks of fixing . The thing is for it to happen the players have to onboard as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boner Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Unlikely. There would have been players who'd have objected so we'd have seen a core group of players isolated or shipped out of the club for apparently no good reason, then replaced by no marks who wouldn't complain about anything. Luckily this hasn't happened and BRFC continues to be a beacon to clubs around the world on how to run a football club really well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amo Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Do we really need conspiracy theories to explain for Kean's total ineptitude? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backroom DE. Posted April 30, 2012 Backroom Share Posted April 30, 2012 I wouldn't blame betting companies for being suspicious, our team was blatently set out to lose and Kean never changed his system despite overwhelming evidence it wasn't working. However, as Toppers says, it's likely much more to do with Kean just being utterly clueless than anything sinister in this instance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OJRovers Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 I've heard the rumour, did it come from somewhere in London like the 'Allardyce betting'? 8-0-2 formation in a must win game Spurs team with only 1 win in 9, reasonable odds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nelsta Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 Wouldnt that imply the win at old trafford was intended? If so and Kean is picking the games to win and loose dosnt that make him a fantastic manager? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sw0808 Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 would still love to know what dunn had to wink about when he approached the bench yesterday? Marion picked up on it in her brilliant 606 piece! I have never winked in my life unless I have just got away with a "stunt" -- think bloodgate! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAL Posted April 30, 2012 Share Posted April 30, 2012 You have to ask are the Venky's involved with the Indian cricket betting scandal people after sundays no shots at goal game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FourLaneBlue Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 Do we really need conspiracy theories to explain for Kean's total ineptitude? I think so, yes. Incompetence is only believable up to a certain point. Then the logical interpretation points at something more sinister. I think those who think Venky's/Kean are merely incompetent are just too thick to consider the far more likely alternatives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ABBEY Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 I recall the rumours doing the rounds when zzzam was sacked ....33/1 million quid bet put on . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beta Ray Bill Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 I think so, yes. Incompetence is only believable up to a certain point. Then the logical interpretation points at something more sinister. I think those who think Venky's/Kean are merely incompetent are just too thick to consider the far more likely alternatives. Thanks for that. Glad to know I'm thick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philipl Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 Interesting this thread has not been attacked or that nobody has definitively said that Betfred paid out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenodrog Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 I've heard the rumour, did it come from somewhere in London like the 'Allardyce betting'? Indeed..... Allardyces sacking attracted numerous 'significant' bets in a number of betting shops in a small area of London and similar in Glasgow on the morning that hia sacking was announced in the late afternoon. My post revealing that betting 'irregularity' got pulled on here though and I got a weeks ban for posting a simple link to the story which appeared in the Daily Mirror. Somebody not quite as perceptive as I must have thought that I was being unkind and unfair toward our new owners. Suffice to say my suspicions were correct that the buggers were definitely dodgy right from the word go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glen9mullan Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 Indeed..... Allardyces sacking attracted numerous 'significant' bets in a number of betting shops in a small area of London and similar in Glasgow on the morning that hia sacking was announced in the late afternoon. My post revealing that betting 'irregularity' got pulled on here though and I got a weeks ban for posting a simple link to the story which appeared in the Daily Mirror. Somebody not quite as perceptive as I must have thought that I was being unkind and unfair toward our new owners. Suffice to say my suspicions were correct that the buggers were definitely dodgy right from the word go. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gav Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 I wonder if betfred suspended betting last night after Fergie opted for 'Kean esq' tactics which resulted in not 1 shot on goal for United Then again, betfred has already paid out 500k on United WINNING the league and is set to lose another £400k if City win it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthAussieRover Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 Nah Gav. Mercerman's cleaned them out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perthblue02 Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 Seems a relevant thread , A good read and an eye opener on how easy things get done The Fix: Soccer and organized Crime and Sepp Blatter totally dismissed the book, so must have hit a few home truths in my opinion. Not that I am suggesting anything dodgy was going on on Sunday, Kean's proved his incompetence over one and a half seasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FourLaneBlue Posted May 1, 2012 Share Posted May 1, 2012 Thanks for that. Glad to know I'm thick. Sorry, I'm just really fleurked off about all things Rovers. I think I should avoid anything Rovers for the next, I don't know, few years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.