ChrisyG Posted May 26, 2012 Posted May 26, 2012 Sorry but that is completely wrong. Even the VH website doesn't make such exaggerated claims about the worth of the Group. Venky's India turns over £170m making £10m (last year- profit almost certainly down this year). Of that, VH only OWNS 53% so their share of profits is £5m. VH group claims to have a turnover of about £600m although I have a private Indian analysts report assessing it as quite a bit smaller- around £470m. The 28 Group companies includes several dormant companies including at least one which went through the Indian equivalent of administration. Venky's spout drivel on the odd occasion they say anything. Why Rovers fans spout drivel on their behalf is beyond me. If these figures are anywhere near accurate, it makes me wonder how they got the money together to purchase Rovers. It's not like they're making huge profits. Certainly not enough to run a premiership football club.
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
philipl Posted May 26, 2012 Posted May 26, 2012 If these figures are anywhere near accurate, it makes me wonder how they got the money together to purchase Rovers. It's not like they're making huge profits. Certainly not enough to run a premiership football club. yes- good question isn't it...?
glen9mullan Posted May 26, 2012 Posted May 26, 2012 As Philip has correctly stated their turnover cannot be mistaken by the hard profit. Venkys sell wigits on a little and often basis, at low mark up value, this produces massive turnover but their record profits could not have bought half of rovers
MullenVoid Posted May 26, 2012 Posted May 26, 2012 Does my head in when people bang on about how big their turnover is/is growing. counts for very little towards the true worth of a company. the bottom line is where i look first. of course anyone with half a brain knows this already, so sorry to repeat th'obvious.
Stuart Posted May 26, 2012 Posted May 26, 2012 On a completely unrelated matter - apologies for hijacking this thread - I wonder who it was that found out about the goings-on at Rangers, specifically the Ticketus money...?
Majiball Posted May 26, 2012 Posted May 26, 2012 On a completely unrelated matter - apologies for hijacking this thread - I wonder who it was that found out about the goings-on at Rangers, specifically the Ticketus money...? I heard it was Steve Kean.
G Somerset Rover Posted May 26, 2012 Posted May 26, 2012 yes- good question isn't it...? Certainly adds even more weight (as if any more was needed) to the third party ownership, Scottish mafia, agency owned theories.
47er Posted May 26, 2012 Posted May 26, 2012 Certainly adds even more weight (as if any more was needed) to the third party ownership, Scottish mafia, agency owned theories. yep! Venkys under no financial pressure to sell cos never had the money to buy and run a Premier League anyway. Bizarre experiment to continue I'd suggest!
chaddyrovers Posted May 27, 2012 Posted May 27, 2012 According to Nicko twitter, the club is for sale or at least being offer to other people Yes. Goldman Sachs offered club to ANOTHER posssible buyer at 30m. They thought that was too dear. Same fee, same reply. Same price quoted to Arab middle men a month ago. No buyers at that price. But main point for me is they WILL sell. What's the point in them having a club they don't watch and get pilloried for? Beats me.
perthblue02 Posted May 27, 2012 Posted May 27, 2012 According to Nicko twitter, What's the point in them having a club they don't watch and get pilloried for? Beats me. IMO there is a lot of shredding yet to be done before Venky's are instructed to accept a bid as the "owners", hence the silly asking price. Think there would be panic and not in India if someone rolls up and slaps 30 million on the table tomorrow
rhodie Posted May 27, 2012 Posted May 27, 2012 Sorry but that is completely wrong. Even the VH website doesn't make such exaggerated claims about the worth of the Group. Venky's India turns over £170m making £10m (last year- profit almost certainly down this year). Of that, VH only OWNS 53% so their share of profits is £5m. VH group claims to have a turnover of about £600m although I have a private Indian analysts report assessing it as quite a bit smaller- around £470m. The 28 Group companies includes several dormant companies including at least one which went through the Indian equivalent of administration. Venky's spout drivel on the odd occasion they say anything. Why Rovers fans spout drivel on their behalf is beyond me. quote] [u]Don`t know where you have got your figures from Philip,Venkys (India) total turnover for last year (audited) ending 31/3/2011 Turnover=85,201 Lakhs which is £98,244,341.09 Profit after tax=7,303 Lakhs which is £8,421,094 As you know Venkys India is only a portion of the organisation,so the money is there its only a case of getting them to spend it.
patrickvalery Posted May 27, 2012 Posted May 27, 2012 Does that mean a lakh is worth 1 million ruppes? I thought it was 100000? Mathematics - not my strong point. However, it doesn't matter a jot. They could be making Apple sized profits and it wouldn't matter. Because they don't want to spend a penny / rupee of it on us.
Clitherover Posted May 27, 2012 Posted May 27, 2012 According to Nicko twitter, the club is for sale or at least being offer to other people Yes. Goldman Sachs offered club to ANOTHER posssible buyer at 30m. They thought that was too dear. Same fee, same reply. Same price quoted to Arab middle men a month ago. No buyers at that price. But main point for me is they WILL sell. What's the point in them having a club they don't watch and get pilloried for? Beats me. Lol, Nicko is blocking my twitter account, haven't tweeted anything to him at all. Has he blocked other Rovers fans or is it just me?
Moderation Lead K-Hod Posted May 27, 2012 Moderation Lead Posted May 27, 2012 Lol, Nicko is blocking my twitter account, haven't tweeted anything to him at all. Has he blocked other Rovers fans or is it just me? If you question anything Kean or Coyle related (mainly the latter) he will get you blocked. His ego must be massive if he can't admit he was wrong when it's so obvious.
WaKKo- Posted May 27, 2012 Posted May 27, 2012 Indian semantic International semantic 1 Lakh 1 Hundred Thousand 10 Lakhs 1 Million 1 Crore 10 Million 10 Crore 100 Million 1 Sael(Arab) 1 Billion 10 Sael(Kharab) 10 Billion 100 Sael(Marab) 100 Billion 1 Lakh = £1,153.10 10 Lakh = £11,531
philipl Posted May 27, 2012 Posted May 27, 2012 Does that mean a lakh is worth 1 million ruppes? I thought it was 100000? Mathematics - not my strong point. However, it doesn't matter a jot. They could be making Apple sized profits and it wouldn't matter. Because they don't want to spend a penny / rupee of it on us. Lakh - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakh A lakh is a unit in the South Asian numbering system equal to one hundred thousand (100000), written as 1,00000. So 85,201 x £1,153 = £98,236,753 Thanks for the confirmation rhodie that these guys are minnows. As for the Nixon story, Goldman Sachs have denied all involvement in selling the club- and that is from a serious potential bidder who approached them after Venky's themselves would not talk.
Clitherover Posted May 27, 2012 Posted May 27, 2012 I mentioned something relating him to a stopped clock on here the other week, he happen still reads this messageboard and linked to my twitter account then. Probably a blessing in disguise not having to read his tweets anyway, the man's clearly an arse.
G Somerset Rover Posted May 27, 2012 Posted May 27, 2012 Let's be fair now here Clitherover, Kean and Coyley have turned out to be gems....
John Posted May 27, 2012 Posted May 27, 2012 Anyone asked him if he still rates the SEM lads as good managers?
Moderation Lead K-Hod Posted May 27, 2012 Moderation Lead Posted May 27, 2012 Anyone asked him if he still rates the SEM lads as good managers? I asked him a while back if he still thinks Kean is 'impressive'. He said I needed to do better research...
Backroom DE. Posted May 27, 2012 Backroom Posted May 27, 2012 Not surprised Nixon doesn't post on here anymore, somebody could quite easily do a Tris-special and absolutely destroy his credibility by dragging up various farcical past posts.
PAFELL Posted May 27, 2012 Posted May 27, 2012 Certainly adds even more weight (as if any more was needed) to the third party ownership, Scottish mafia, agency owned theories. There must be someway of establishing if venkys are the genuine owners. If they are not, why are they prepared to put up with all the bad publicity - on behalf of somebody else.
Amo Posted May 27, 2012 Posted May 27, 2012 Funny to think there was a time when you could be banned for disagreeing with Nicko.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.