Steve Moss Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 I suppose this woman should have just allowed herself to be sexually assaulted again, according to the logic of some: http://www.nraila.org/gun-laws/armed-citizen/2013/woman-in-her-60s-fights-off-attacker,-the-kansas-city-star,-kansas-city,-mo-111413.aspx?s=&st=&ps And here's a long list of incidents of lawful firearm use to deter criminals- http://www.nraila.org/gun-laws/armed-citizen.aspx And here's an article citing to statistics that those who use a firearm to protect themselves are less likely to be injured than those choosing other strategies- http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/06/25/study-using-guns-for-defense-leads-to-fewer-injuries But, in Merry Olde England, I suppose its preferable to hand over both your property and dignity as opposed to putting a bullet in the scum intending to take both from you. Here's a decent recitation of pro and cons for the use of guns- http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/human_nature/2013/06/handguns_suicides_mass_shootings_deaths_and_self_defense_findings_from_a.html
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Audax Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 What about the personal freedom to live? Ingrained my arse, do what you have always done and you get what you have always got Donovan had/has a solution He's five foot two and he's six feet four He fights with missiles and with spears He's all of thirty-one and he's only seventeen Been a soldier for a thousand years He's a Catholic, a Hindu, an Atheist, a Jain A Buddhist and a Baptist and a Jew And he knows he shouldn't kill and he knows he always will Kill you for me my friend and me for you And he's fighting for Canada He's fighting for France, he's fighting for the U.S.A. And he's fighting for the Russians And he's fighting for Japan And he thinks we'll put an end to war this way And he's fighting for Democracy, he's fighting for the Reds He says "It's for the peace of all" He's the one who must decide, who's to live and who's to die And he never sees the writing on the wall But without him How would Hitler have condemned him at Labau? Without him Caesar would have stood alone He's the one who gives his body as a weapon of the war And without him all this killing can't go on He's the Universal Soldier and he really is to blame His orders come from far away no more They come from here and there and you and me And brothers can't you see This is not the way we put the end to war ie no killers, no dead Off Topic: Per that song, interesting, 100 years ago World War I started if I have that correct. The war everyone knows a lot about to me seems WWII, the heroes, the villains. But I've read up on World War I some, The Somme, Le Somme in Belgium France. That was an unbelievable bloody battle and the poem reminded me of it. To all, I was thinking of trying to start up a World War I thread to discuss the "Great War". Just wasn't sure in what terms to couch it, perhaps I will as the anniversary gets closer. Looks like the War started in the summer of 1914. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Somme Saw the movie "Joyeux Noel", what a flick. Okay, rant over. ------------ Back to gun control, what about the right to live? I heard they collected some people's guns in Munich in the 1930s.
dave birch Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 Who are we, living our lives outside the USA, to complain about their laws and "customs'. If they want it the way they have it, it's their problem, not mine, nor yours. I would object if they imposed their will upon me, so I suspect that Steve is getting a little bit back on the "assault" he's put up with. It's his country, they'll decide which way things go, and all the bleating from around the world will not make one iota of difference. ps, I could never live in the US for many of the reasons stated in many posts, but, for some reason, my daughter loves it, particularly NY.
Stuart Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 Any examples to back up your hyperboly? I think I just heard your mum cringe.
thenodrog Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 Who are we, living our lives outside the USA, to complain about their laws and "customs'. If they want it the way they have it, it's their problem, not mine, nor yours. I would object if they imposed their will upon me, so I suspect that Steve is getting a little bit back on the "assault" he's put up with. It's his country, they'll decide which way things go, and all the bleating from around the world will not make one iota of difference. ps, I could never live in the US for many of the reasons stated in many posts, but, for some reason, my daughter loves it, particularly NY. Quite right Dave. A point I've made frequently. Imagine the short shrift that we'd give to assorted foreigners for pontificating about our laws from the other side of the globe. I must admit the prospect of defending yourself properly and effectively against some scroat/scroats who has broken into your property with the sole intent to rob/injure/rape as Tony martin did with impunity does have some appeal. Especially in light of the ridiculous 'reasonable force' issue.
T.J.Newton Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 Well thete free to protect therir famlies and their land/property by any means for obe thing.
ABBEY Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 Well thete free to protect therir famlies and their land/property by any means for obe thing.?
thenodrog Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 A birthday honour from the queen tj? And that's after you've edited it!
T.J.Newton Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 I just dont think guns are the reap issue, just an eady excuse
dave birch Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 Beat me to it, Theno. TJ, you edited that! Care to let us know what the original was? It's about 9am in Blackburn, isn't it? On the phone doing it TJ?
T.J.Newton Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 Cant remember, I was probably just correcting a spelling or somat(still missef a few mind)
dave birch Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 TJ, just get smaller fingers or a bigger phone
T.J.Newton Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 I think best thing is if I just leave the subject, as I know not what I say
Backroom Tom Posted January 28, 2014 Backroom Posted January 28, 2014 Well thete free to protect therir famlies and their land/property by any means for obe thing. You are going to need more than that to back up the ridiculous point you made Plus it's probably not even true these days, many people have been prosecuted for it I think
ABBEY Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 Another shooting .. Hawaii this time I love America and the people but f me they are insane . Get rid of your guns you idiots
T.J.Newton Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 has anybody on here actually given any suggestions to how America could go about disarming its citizens without A. all the good sensible people giving up their weapons whilst criminals & nutjobs will still have access B. causing a civil war on some scale.
Moderation Lead K-Hod Posted January 28, 2014 Moderation Lead Posted January 28, 2014 It's too far gone to disarm, but gun control should definitely be better, far too many incidents happening where lives are lost that are so avoidable.
FGS5635 Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 has anybody on here actually given any suggestions to how America could go about disarming its citizens without A. all the good sensible people giving up their weapons whilst criminals & nutjobs will still have access B. causing a civil war on some scale. Look to the future and make all guns need licensing that are purchased from now forward. Set guidlines for who can and who cant own them. It may take a generation to take effect, but its better than sitting back and doing nothing for decades becasue it 'to late/hard' to do it now
T.J.Newton Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 there's already millions of guns out there and if they are looked after right, then theoretically they could outlast generations of people.
Audax Posted January 29, 2014 Posted January 29, 2014 Looked up this Hawaiian shooting,doesn't look like anyone got killed. http://news.msn.com/crime-justice/officer-shot-boy-in-wrist-at-hawaii-school-police The young man, sounds like a runaway and from what I'm reading, it looks like the youth did NOT have a gun. The youth got shot from bandying a knife. Anyway, I would wager that most 35 year olds and older and maybe a little younger are going to be responsible with a gun. A lot of the crimes seem to be the 19 year olds, younger and maybe a little older who shoot others, shoot each other. I don't know if the whole of society should be punished if they don't know how to act. But I'm not sure what can be done to lessen the violence between youth and their abuse with guns.
ultrablue Posted January 29, 2014 Posted January 29, 2014 The simple fact is that, come campaign time, gun control is not a vote winner, but it certainly is a vote loser. Closing an obvious loophole in the federal law where a background check is not required if you buy your weapon at a gun show had almost universal support including that of the NRA (until the financial crisis scared them). Yet it didnt pass because, for the most part, gun control would be political suicide for so many in the House. And yes partly because it wouldn't make an overall impact in the rate of crimes involving guns. But that is the sad thing, the Wild West mentality along with the huge disparity between state gun control laws means that the good guy vs. bad guy narrative will always prevail and gun control will continue to lose you votes. As long as you have routinely armed criminals, the majority will reserve the right to be armed. http://www.cagv.org/understanding_firearms.htm If you want to learn more about gun traffiking in the US read this. Very interesting.
Audax Posted January 29, 2014 Posted January 29, 2014 The simple fact is that, come campaign time, gun control is not a vote winner, but it certainly is a vote loser. Closing an obvious loophole in the federal law where a background check is not required if you buy your weapon at a gun show had almost universal support including that of the NRA (until the financial crisis scared them). Yet it didnt pass because, for the most part, gun control would be political suicide for so many in the House. And yes partly because it wouldn't make an overall impact in the rate of crimes involving guns. But that is the sad thing, the Wild West mentality along with the huge disparity between state gun control laws means that the good guy vs. bad guy narrative will always prevail and gun control will continue to lose you votes. As long as you have routinely armed criminals, the majority will reserve the right to be armed. http://www.cagv.org/understanding_firearms.htm If you want to learn more about gun traffiking in the US read this. Very interesting. Ultra, you definitely bring up some important issues here. I wonder if many "guns show" purchased firearms have been involved in many crimes, period, mass shootings etc. I know there was a story where a gun discharged at a gunshow, someone got hurt but it would be interesting to see if statistically those weapons can be tied to crimes. Those "straw purchasers" I heard happen on the border with Mexico too at gun shops in order to "gun run", get guns INTO Mexico.
FGS5635 Posted January 29, 2014 Posted January 29, 2014 there's already millions of guns out there and if they are looked after right, then theoretically they could outlast generations of people. Maybe stage it. All new weapons from x date need licensing. Once the system is in place and doing its job, make people license their older weapons by certain dates. If they are not licensed they are illegal. Its a slow process and will take years and wont fully work, but its better than nothing and with commitment from goverment etc it will eventually breed results and maybe 1 day be the answer
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.