Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

[Archived] Next Manager Part 2


Kamy100

  

499 members have voted

  1. 1. Which of the following managers would you accept



Recommended Posts

think the priority is get someone in who will smash a few tea cups on the wall and get them of of this comfort zonethey have been in for far too long. they will be thinking losing is a positive result now after num nuts brain washed them for the last 2 yrs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Nobody, including myself, knows what he will be like. However, he should get every drop of our support to enable him to succeed due to his past actions.

I am sure it would be easy to rip apart your preferred manager.

History tells us that hiring managers with a previous record of success (even with the odd failure in) will tend to do much better than a novice. Especially in what is a difficult situation, and when promotion in the next season or two is so important.

I don't see how this is difficult to argue.

The future of our club is at stake, there's no room for this ridiculous sentimentality. We don't owe the man a job, we owe ourselves the best shot of success, and Shearer quite patently is not it.

The one thing I will agree on is that if he does get the job, the atmosphere at Ewood on match day should be completely supportive. But that doesn't extend to discussing the basic facts and logic of the situation on message forums such as these.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think any candidate is ever going to be 'ideal' as there are too many factors involved. Perhaps the most appropriate candidate could be done via algebra -

c = 2y x (5b + (8r + 3p)/2 + 2m - 3a) + 4q - 3w - 10000000k

where

c is candidate rating

y is lack of yes man

b is buzz created

r is track record

p is potential

m is media savvy

a is influence of agents

q is training qualifications

w is the wage

k is the similarity to KeanOut

all the variables rate on scale of 0-10. Who scores the most (or more likely the least negative score) gets the job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Usually I'd be against making an appointment on this basis, and I'm still of the opinion that there are better options, but after the trauma and division of the last two years there definitely is value of an appointment who manages to get everyone onside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think any candidate is ever going to be 'ideal' as there are too many factors involved. Perhaps the most appropriate candidate could be done via algebra -

c = 2y x (5b + (8r + 3p)/2 + 2m - 3a) + 4q - 3w - 10000000k

where

c is candidate rating

y is lack of yes man

b is buzz created

r is track record

p is potential

m is media savvy

a is influence of agents

q is training qualifications

w is the wage

k is the similarity to KeanOut

all the variables rate on scale of 0-10. Who scores the most (or more likely the least negative score) gets the job.

Don't let Shebby see that Bill - we'll be here until 2019 ! "So what was "c" again?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The club is in debt to Shearer so we should trust him, a man whose only experience in management is to have got 5 points from 8 games and relegated Newcastle, with the most important job appointment in the clubs history??!!

Jesus wept.

Blackburn Rovers Football Club is f--ed if Shearer gets the gig. This I am sure of.

I'll take that as a positive.

I'll bet though you'd be absolutely delighted if Souness was appointed, even though he very nearly ruined the Club by the end last time he was here and even though he hasn't managed for many years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the only way to get the best out of Shearer as manager would be to get in Chris Sutton as his number two, with Stuart Ripley and Jason Wilcox as first team coaches.

Sutton as number 2 !!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll take that as a positive.

I'll bet though you'd be absolutely delighted if Souness was appointed, even though he very nearly ruined the Club by the end last time he was here and even though he hasn't managed for many years?

Why on earth do you say that? I would be against Souness for exactly those reasons you mentioned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There could be some embarrassed ITKers on here if the manager gets appointed on Wednesday and it's not Black, Holloway or Shirley. Personally, I just want to see a bloody good manager appointed. Shearer, while utterly underwhelming, would at least get a lot of support.

As I posted earlier, I have no idea who the new man is, only that he should be here by Wednesday. Shearer is just what some people have been saying but not been able to verify that.

The truth is that outside of a very close group of people (Shebby, the owners and possibily Shaw) nobody knows for sure who the new man is. Hopefully it is true that it will be done by Wednesday so that we can end the "uncertainty" and get on with things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I posted earlier, I have no idea who the new man is, only that he should be here by Wednesday. Shearer is just what some people have been saying but not been able to verify that.

The truth is that outside of a very close group of people (Shebby, the owners and possibily Shaw) nobody knows for sure who the new man is. Hopefully it is true that it will be done by Wednesday so that we can end the "uncertainty" and get on with things.

Someone in the loop must be bursting by now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

History tells us that hiring managers with a previous record of success (even with the odd failure in) will tend to do much better than a novice. Especially in what is a difficult situation, and when promotion in the next season or two is so important.

I don't see how this is difficult to argue.

The future of our club is at stake, there's no room for this ridiculous sentimentality. We don't owe the man a job, we owe ourselves the best shot of success, and Shearer quite patently is not it.

The one thing I will agree on is that if he does get the job, the atmosphere at Ewood on match day should be completely supportive. But that doesn't extend to discussing the basic facts and logic of the situation on message forums such as these.

I can't disagree with the logic of wanting a manager with more experience and if I owned the club then this is the safe route I will probably go down. However, I am a fan, a fan that has disliked 99 percent of everything to do with the club since Venkys took over. From managers, to owners to crap players they have all been appalling.

However, the image of Shearer and Newell stood on the sideline is a tremendous one, and hopefully making it a success. If it fails, then we fail together this time.

It might all be irrelevant anyway when McKinley gets the job, ha ha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, because hiring McCarthy who has won the league we are in twice, or Dalglish who had done well with Liverpool is exactly the same sort of gamble as hiring a novice like Shearer.

That's like saying "putting 50 quid on Saudi Arabia to win the next World Cup is a gamble, but then so is putting 50 quid on Spain to win it so let's do it".

Do you honestly think the buzz will be in Ewood once he starts losing games?

Do you honestly think that if McCarthy got us promoted Ewood wouldn't have a buzz?

I do understand your points but yours are as flawed as those who want Shearer. Who's to say that McCarthy would get us promoted? I know he has an impressive record in the Championship but nothing is guaranteed. If he loses games, then what? Every single option is a risk. Some risks are more calculated than others (ie the risk is lower) but nothing is certain, most certainly when it comes to football.

If Shearer is appointed everyone should get behind the team and save any grudges for if ACTUALLY goes tits up (and remember that's an IF). People on here are quick to write off anyone without giving them a chance. I am not saying support the likes of Judan Ali or McKinley as these are nonsensical, but appointing someone like Shearer, whilst not everyone's desired option, does have a certain allure to it and due to him having the right qualifications (coaching standards) and having the backing of quality backroom staff and media we should 100% give him a chance.

I know we are all the most cynical fans but we need to be realistic here. It isn't guaranteed that we will get a perfect manager and it isn't guaranteed an experienced manager would do well. If Shearer gets appointed and you boycott due to it not being a manager you'd have wanted then you need to take a long, hard look in the mirror and consider slipping on claret and blue instead.

I just wish everyone would give up bickering, we give the manager a chance and if it goes well then hurray we can all be happy. If it goes wrong then we can start moaning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't disagree with the logic of wanting a manager with more experience and if I owned the club then this is the safe route I will probably go down. However, I am a fan, a fan that has disliked 99 percent of everything to do with the club since Venkys took over. From managers, to owners to crap players they have all been appalling.

However, the image of Shearer and Newell stood on the sideline is a tremendous one, and hopefully making it a success. If it fails, then we fail together this time.

It might all be irrelevant anyway when McKinley gets the job, ha ha

Call me racist but do we want another Scotch man in charge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't disagree with the logic of wanting a manager with more experience and if I owned the club then this is the safe route I will probably go down. However, I am a fan, a fan that has disliked 99 percent of everything to do with the club since Venkys took over. From managers, to owners to crap players they have all been appalling.

However, the image of Shearer and Newell stood on the sideline is a tremendous one, and hopefully making it a success. If it fails, then we fail together this time.

It might all be irrelevant anyway when McKinley gets the job, ha ha

The chance of failure is much higher than appointing a proven manager though. We'd have an assistant who has failed at two out of the three clubs he's been at and who's never assistant managed, with a manager who didn't exactly do well in his only stint as manager so far.

If it succeeded, got us promoted and kept us there, looking at it objectively it would be a massive surprise surely?

And I have to say this image of this uniting the fans I don't think will be accurate if it fails. There will be far more divisions and doubts within the fanbase about whether to fire Shearer than there ever was about whether to fire Kean if things don't go well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:huh:

This manager lark must really be getting to people. Best joke on here for a while and everyone's taking it as a serious suggestion.

Like I was saying to Patrick Valery a few pages back, the humour's had to be dumbed down a bit since the good old days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Announcements

  • You can now add BlueSky, Mastodon and X accounts to your BRFCS Profile.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.