Andy Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 Could this be an intentional 'leak' from the club to try and placate fans? ...whilst they tie up a deal for Billy McKinlay/Garry Flitcroft/any other random former midfielders from the 90's?
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
martonrover Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 Could this be an intentional 'leak' from the club to try and placate fans? ...whilst they tie up a deal for Billy McKinlay/Garry Flitcroft/any other random former midfielders from the 90's? A few posters have made this point but I think it does the opposite if it doesn't come off as it raises expectations. We've gone from Flitcroft being a certainty last night to 'Arry being in the frame this morning!
booth Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 Pure speculation. No direct quotes, no quoted sources, nothing. Known in the newspaper trade as a "flier" and should be treated with caution.. Cryer at the Telegraph got his article in first. I doubt Cryer would be writing something like that if there was no substance to it. What are you on about caution? We aren't going to disintegrate if it doesn't happen.
rovers_rob Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 Alan Nixon just tweeted that he has checked with team Redknapp and there is nothing in it from either side.
Tootell Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 Alan Nixon just tweeted that he has checked with team Redknapp and there is nothing in it from either side. sounds about right
yoda Posted October 25, 2012 Author Posted October 25, 2012 Alan Nixon just tweeted that he has checked with team Redknapp and there is nothing in it from either side. Done deal then
Clitherover Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 Alan Nixon just tweeted that he has checked with team Redknapp and there is nothing in it from either side. Is that because he didn't break the story?
T4E Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 No it's because he has far greater contacts than any other Rovers "ITK" throughout the football world.
martonrover Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 No it's because he has far greater contacts than any other Rovers "ITK" throughout the football world. Agreed, but he knew nowt about McKinlay
True Blue & White Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 No it's because he has far greater contacts than any other Rovers "ITK" throughout the football world.
bennyboyt11 Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 Why the hell would Harry want to come to us? The man notoriously adamant to stay in the South.
Brad Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 At his age he will want atleast a three year contract, will never happen. Funny stuff to be honest.
yoda Posted October 25, 2012 Author Posted October 25, 2012 At his age he will want atleast a three year contract, will never happen. Funny stuff to be honest. ageist
John Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 Harry is very money orientated so would not completely dismiss this - Cryer convinced he wants it - don't know what he (Cryer) means by one of his latest tweets that he has been asked to put the feelers out??
Blue n White Rover Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 Agreed, but he knew nowt about McKinlay I think you'll find that he did, and his article that also stopped us from getting McKinlay. Luckily.
yoda Posted October 25, 2012 Author Posted October 25, 2012 Why the hell would Harry want to come to us? The man notoriously adamant to stay in the South. because its easier to get a job if your already employed !
booth Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 Harry is very money orientated so would not completely dismiss this - Cryer convinced he wants it - don't know what he (Cryer) means by one of his latest tweets that he has been asked to put the feelers out?? Cryer was saying that the original interest came from Harry not Rovers. Perhaps he's been asked how the fans would take it?
Clitherover Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 No it's because he has far greater contacts than any other Rovers "ITK" throughout the football world. His ''contacts'' must be winding him right up then because half of the stuff he prints is proven bullshyte.
Blue n White Rover Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 His ''contacts'' must be winding him right up then because half of the stuff he prints is proven bullshyte. He printed that Rovers were after Sherwood. He printed Bolton were after Freedman. He printed Rovers were after McKinlay. He printed that there is a split between Shebby and Shaw. He printed the Holloway story and that he has a release clause of £500k. Now would you be kind enough to point of the 'bullshyte' in that?
imy9 Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 He printed that Rovers were after Sherwood. He printed Bolton were after Freedman. He printed Rovers were after McKinlay. He printed that there is a split between Shebby and Shaw. He printed the Holloway story and that he has a release clause of £500k. Now would you be kind enough to point of the 'bullshyte' in that? Also printed that Armstrong was advising Shebby, and amongst other info that has turned out to be true. Given an unnecessary bad rep on here especially as he has a soft spot for Rovers from Jacks day.
True Blue & White Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 He printed that Rovers were after Sherwood. He printed Bolton were after Freedman. He printed Rovers were after McKinlay. He printed that there is a split between Shebby and Shaw. He printed the Holloway story and that he has a release clause of £500k. Now would you be kind enough to point of the 'bullshyte' in that? Naming a few things he's got right doesn't counter the argument that he's also spouted a load of crap too. As they say, a broken clock is still right twice a day. Remember the £50m war chest he said Allardyce would get in Venky's first January window, which actually turned out to be a £5m payment in agenct fees and weird third party arrangements spent by Jerome Anderson on behalf of Steve Kean? Then there was the time he said Bentley was on the verge on signing a new contract shortly before he buggered off to Spurs. I thought the nickoteens had left when he did.
True Blue & White Posted October 25, 2012 Posted October 25, 2012 Oh well, it was nice whilst it lasted.... HARRY REJECTS ROVERS RUMOURS This week, Blackburn have also been linked with another former Spurs manager Redknapp, but he told ESPN there is "no chance" of him being persuaded by the club's global advisor Shebby Singh to take up the post.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.