[Archived] Henning Berg - Rovers Manager

[Rover_Shaun]

Drat

[Sparky Marky]

Hughes has to be our target now...

[broadsword]

Mark Hughes has just made an almighty mess of QPR, no thanks.

[chaddyrovers]

Mark Hughes has just made an almighty mess of QPR, no thanks.

I agree. His has lost his good man management skills he had a Rovers.

he also has a big ego now which he had. Failed at City and QPR(massively) and did ok at Fulham. but walk out on Fulham cos he thought he would get a bigger club which he didnt.

[K-Hod]

<blockquote class='ipsBlockquote'data-author="Stuart" data-cid="1350103" data-time="1355846893"><p>

Kamy, whilst your inputs and insights are extremely appreciated, the the point where you are deemed greatest contributor (football and in general), it might be for the best if you share your personal feelings via a different Twitter account - or be more explicit about them.<br />

<br />

Today both yourself and Dan have posted emotive pieces, briefly and at length respectively and, due to the already tensions already being high, people are once again baying for blood.<br />

<br />

It's not good for anyone.</p></blockquote>

Maybe so. But what I expressed was a personal opinion that I felt that Henning would walkaway soon. Don't think that caused the meltdown, but what did was people posting about Henning storming out of training and then a BS ITK account saying he had resigned.

But I take your comments on board and will be more careful in future.

No need to apologise, you just reported your opinion. You didn't state facts based on nothing.....

[jim mk2]

Hughes did a fine job for us at the time but is now damaged goods. We might need a replacement for Berg soon but Hughes is not the man.

To be honest, the best move Venkys could make would be to admit they made a mistake and re-hire a certain adminstrator now working for Manchester City. The club needs a shake-up from the boardroom down and, assuming Venky's are going to be our owners for some time, they need to start at the top.

[Stuart]

<blockquote class='ipsBlockquote'data-author="jim mk2" data-cid="1350128" data-time="1355850962"><p>

Hughes did a fine job for us at the time but is now damaged goods. We might need a replacement for Berg soon but Hughes is not the man.<br />

<br />

To be honest, the best move Venkys could make would be to admit they made a mistake and re-hire a certain adminstrator now working for Manchester City. The club needs a shake-up from the boardroom down and, assuming Venky's are going to be our owners for some time, they need to start at the top.</p></blockquote>

***

If I thought there was even a slim chance that Hughes would come back, I'd drive him here myself. Then I'd drive back and pick up all his tafia crew.

But if there was a chance of John Williams coming back I'd walk over hot coals on the way to the car.

[OJRovers]

I don't want Berg to leave

I think it would be far more productive if shebby, Agnew, Shaw were cleared out.

If berg goes it would only be him taking the blame to save shebby etc

Berg has the club at heart, and needs a proper chance not working under a bunch of jokers.

[dr_awol]

Hughes did a fine job for us at the time but is now damaged goods. We might need a replacement for Berg soon but Hughes is not the man.

***

I don't buy into this damaged goods idea - it just never worked out for him there*

Was BFS damaged goods from when he was sacked at Newcastle ?*

* I don't want Berg to leave

[jim mk2]

I don't buy into this damaged goods idea - it just never worked out for him there

Was BFS damaged goods from when he was sacked at Newcastle ?

Sam was sacked from Newcastle when the club was in mid-table; it made no sense at the time and they were soon relegated, so you could say he came out of it with his reputation enhanced! Hughes spent a fortune at City and was sacked, walked away from Fulham after a year in mysterious circumstances and missed out on a few top jobs before being hired by QPR, spending another shedload of money and leaving them bottom of the table. It could well be that he operates better with little money to spend and he might see Rovers as a chance to rebuild his career and reputation but for the present he is "damaged goods".

[dr who true blue]

Berg to stay and be given a sizeable transfer budget,Agnew shebby and shaw can all feck off and leave the club .And let it be run like it use'd to be under jw.

[dr_awol]

Sam was sacked from Newcastle when the club was in mid-table; it made no sense at the time and they were soon relegated, so you could say he came out of it with his reputation enhanced! Hughes spent a fortune at City and was sacked, walked away from Fulham after a year in mysterious circumstances and missed out on a few top jobs before being hired by QPR, spending another shedload of money and leaving them bottom of the table. It could well be that he operates better with little money to spend and he might see Rovers as a chance to rebuild his career and reputation but for the present he is "damaged goods".

***

Hughes:

• Did well at Wales
• Did well at Rovers
• Did ok at Man city
• Did good a Fulham
• Got QPR promoted and had a poor start to the season (granted it did not look like he was gonna turn things around)

Not sure its enough to cast him off into the wilderness. still we have a good manager that has not had time to make is own team with which to prove himself.. not sure why where talking about Mark Hughes

[Andy]

He didn't get QPR promoted...that was Neil Warnock.

Hughes has been a complete disaster at QPR.

[K-Hod]

Hughes:

• Did well at Wales
• Did well at Rovers
• Did ok at Man city
• Did good a Fulham
• Got QPR promoted and had a poor start to the season (granted it did not look like he was gonna turn things around)

Not sure its enough to cast him off into the wilderness. still we have a good manager that has not had time to make is own team with which to prove himself.. not sure why where talking about Mark Hughes

No he didn't, that was Warnock. He kept them up (just barely!!).

[dr_awol]

No he didn't, that was Warnock. He kept them up (just barely!!).

***

Well researched piece, think Warnock might dispute that Hughes got QPR promoted though

***

Ops sorry. got this wrong guess i was thinking he was there longer that he was my bad

still my point still stands hardy makes him damaged goods. 3 successful, 1 Neutral, 1 Bad time at QPR

I don't even want berg to be sacked and Hughes to take over.

[jim mk2]

Ops sorry. got this wrong guess i was thinking he was there longer that he was my bad

still my point still stands hardy makes him damaged goods. 3 successful, 1 Neutral, 1 Bad time at QPR

I don't even want berg to be sacked and Hughes to take over.

Your bad what ? I'd love to know how Hughes was a success at City, and please also explain why he was a "success" at Fulham in 12 short months. Fulham fans were glad to see the back of him.

Read this.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2012/nov/23/mark-hughes-lost-spark-qpr

[Amo]

It almost makes me laugh when people say "This person needs to be targeted" or "Blame needs to be put on...."

As I have said all along...Venkys are a cancer to this club. If they get rid of Shebby, they will just replace him with another idiot...or more likely with an empty chair...which would be favourable actually.

I hate to be 'Debbie Downer' but until Venkys leave, we will not be Blackburn Rovers...as we know it...again.

/thread

[Mercer]

<blockquote class='ipsBlockquote'data-author="Stuart" data-cid="1350103" data-time="1355846893"><p>

Kamy, whilst your inputs and insights are extremely appreciated, the the point where you are deemed greatest contributor (football and in general), it might be for the best if you share your personal feelings via a different Twitter account - or be more explicit about them.<br />

<br />

Today both yourself and Dan have posted emotive pieces, briefly and at length respectively and, due to the already tensions already being high, people are once again baying for blood.<br />

<br />

It's not good for anyone.</p></blockquote>

Maybe so. But what I expressed was a personal opinion that I felt that Henning would walkaway soon. Don't think that caused the meltdown, but what did was people posting about Henning storming out of training and then a BS ITK account saying he had resigned.

But I take your comments on board and will be more careful in future.

No one should have a problem with anyone expressing a personal opinion.

If they cannot differentiate between fact and opinion, perhaps they should not use this MB.

You do a good job both on here and Twitter in keeping Rovers' supporters in the picture as best you can.

You have done absolutely nothing wrong over the last 12 hours or so and as you said, it is, possibly, other spurious postings that have caused issues.

Please continue to keep the supporters in the loop as best you can.

[dr_awol]

Your bad what ? I'd love to know how Hughes was a success at City, and please also explain why he was a "success" at Fulham in 12 short months. Fulham fans were glad to see the back of him.

Read this.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2012/nov/23/mark-hughes-lost-spark-qpr

***

From your Article.. he did well to be offered a new contract at Fulham , never said he was a success at City i said he did OK :- "City were not terrible but nor were they terrifying".

[USABlue]

Me too, if Henning resigns and speaks the truth he will have done more to help us than he could potentially as manager

Shebby needs to be targeted if any of this is true

And adds a little weight to Steve Keans constructive dismissal case.

[Salgado Is A Hero]

No one should have a problem with anyone expressing a personal opinion.

If they cannot differentiate between fact and opinion, perhaps they should not use this MB.

You do a good job both on here and Twitter in keeping Rovers' supporters in the picture as best you can.

You have done absolutely nothing wrong over the last 12 hours or so and as you said, it is, possibly, other spurious postings that have caused issues.

Please continue to keep the supporters in the loop as best you can.

Exactly.....Kamy keep doing what you're doing as I imagine the vast majority have no problem with any of it.

[booth]

If they cannot differentiate between fact and opinion, perhaps they should not use this MB.

If they can't separate facts from opinion then all these easily led nobheads will probably think we're all going to die on Friday anyway due to the Mayan apocalypse, whatever that is.

OH MY GOD WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE!!!!!

[thenodrog]

But would it do anything?

Singh would probably just be appointed with finding a new manager again. Business as usual.

Flitty would be my guess.

Even bigger story...........why is the quote system knackered? Pc, mobile it's knacked on everything

No it's not. Some fiddlefingers has just been pissing about with the board. Took me a while to find the 'back' thingy....... Just click enter a couple of times and drop the curser a line or two before posting.

Hughes did a fine job for us at the time but is now damaged goods. We might need a replacement for Berg soon but Hughes is not the man.

To be honest, the best move Venkys could make would be to admit they made a mistake and re-hire a certain adminstrator now working for Manchester City. The club needs a shake-up from the boardroom down and, assuming Venky's are going to be our owners for some time, they need to start at the top.

Think he'd return? I don't. Poor John lost his wife since he left us btw.

[martonrover]

<blockquote class='ipsBlockquote'data-author="Stuart" data-cid="1350115" data-time="1355848963"><p>

JHC. No-one's saying don't post.<br />

<br />

But if people over react to posts, it's everyone's problem! The slightest whiff of unrest and some folks are off fashioning effegies to burn.<br />

<br />

At the same time there are numpties out there reading these posts so they can log onto their "Agent_ITK_SFA" accounts and release a scoop. Probably Dingles cocking their sides at our expense.</p></blockquote>

You're the only one complaining.

Perhaps a DM might've been more appropriate.

[Gav]

To be honest, the best move Venkys could make would be to admit they made a mistake and re-hire a certain adminstrator now working for Manchester City. The club needs a shake-up from the boardroom down and, assuming Venky's are going to be our owners for some time, they need to start at the top.

Spot on about JW, that would be a massive step in the right direction for Venkys, but it'll never happen Jim because they're not very bright and to be honest don't really give a kean.