Pedro Posted January 28, 2013 Posted January 28, 2013 Sounds like he is signing for Bursaspor on Wednesday. Shame really because he has made an impact in many of the games he has appeared in.
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
T.J.Newton Posted January 28, 2013 Posted January 28, 2013 I'm sure for what where paying him in wages Appleton will be able to find a couple of good players, so m not to worried, he was/is massively temperamental, greedy and inconsistent anyway.
Oklahoma Posted January 28, 2013 Posted January 28, 2013 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2269778/Galatasaray-recall-Colin-Kazim-Richards-sell-Bursaspor.html Recalled and sold for half a million pounds
Dunnfc Posted January 28, 2013 Posted January 28, 2013 Can't understand that. Surely they got a loan fee for ckr of about 400k when we took him and we are paying most of his wages atm. We must have declined on signing him permanant in July for a fee what was going to be more than a million. Strange...
USABlue Posted January 29, 2013 Posted January 29, 2013 Seems like a bit of a punk to me, not sure we will miss him. Got a sneaky feeling the dressing room might be glad to get shut. PLays when he wants doesn't when he doesn't. We need 100%ers.
T.J.Newton Posted January 29, 2013 Posted January 29, 2013 I'm sure if Appleton had wanted to keep him he could easily have got 500k-1mill together to buy him outright, i guess he just isn't rated that highly(and i'm not sad to see him go)
sjsbrfc Posted January 29, 2013 Posted January 29, 2013 According to Andy Cryer, Rovers don't think the rumours are right. He says talks are ongoing about making him permanent at Ewood
bluebruce Posted January 29, 2013 Posted January 29, 2013 Could be an agent ruse to force us into negotiations.
chaddyrovers Posted January 29, 2013 Posted January 29, 2013 Rovers trying to sign Kaz up perm to stop Gala selling him http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/blackburn-rovers-transfer-news-rovers-1561671
chaddyrovers Posted January 30, 2013 Posted January 30, 2013 this morning LT is saying Rovers want to Kaz Permanant. offereing him 4 and half contract.
CapeTownRover Posted January 30, 2013 Posted January 30, 2013 4 and a half years? Jeez, its like the club is father Christmas, just handing out good prezzies for all the naughty and injured boys lol
Clitherover Posted January 30, 2013 Posted January 30, 2013 Four and a half years is ridiculous, you'd think they'd have learnt from the Etuhu contract.
adz4d2 Posted January 30, 2013 Posted January 30, 2013 he is only 26 so 4 and a half year deal if on low wages is quite shrewd, if he plays well and picks up form, sorts his attitude out then you never know one of the big boys might just pay a pretty penny to take him off us in a few years.plus he doesnt get into his prime for atleast 2 years
pick32 Posted January 30, 2013 Posted January 30, 2013 If you look at newcastle they have been giving 4-6 year contacts to all there new french signings.
RockinRover Posted January 30, 2013 Posted January 30, 2013 Kazim-Richards may have a bad attitude but when he turns up he's one of the best players on the pitch so it's up to App to keep him happy if we do sign him permanently.
Clitherover Posted January 30, 2013 Posted January 30, 2013 he is only 26 so 4 and a half year deal if on low wages is quite shrewd, if he plays well and picks up form, sorts his attitude out then you never know one of the big boys might just pay a pretty penny to take him off us in a few years.plus he doesnt get into his prime for atleast 2 years Fair enough if its on low wages as I really rate the guy. I don't imagine he's the sort of person who will take a contract cheaply though and if in the probably unlikely event we go up, can he cut the mustard in the Premiership?. Conversely if we go down next season we could be stuck with another high earner which can be fatal (see Portsmouth). I really think the club shouldn't be handing out long term contracts willy nilly when we are in such a pivotal position that anything could happen in the next year or so. 2 year deal at the very most imo
DavidMailsTightPerm Posted January 30, 2013 Posted January 30, 2013 he is only 26 so 4 and a half year deal if on low wages is quite shrewd, if he plays well and picks up form, sorts his attitude out then you never know one of the big boys might just pay a pretty penny to take him off us in a few years.plus he doesnt get into his prime for atleast 2 years Depends on your definition of low wages - I saw an article mentioning £23k - which may be relatively low for the Premiership - but would be a high wage given our income in the Championship.
roverandout Posted January 30, 2013 Posted January 30, 2013 4 and a half years for a player who aint really that good is mad, why waste money on an average player like richards when it could go to investing in other areas
Baz Posted January 30, 2013 Posted January 30, 2013 4 1/2 years is far too long. Not sure i would have actually bothered signing him at all tbh.
Al Posted January 30, 2013 Posted January 30, 2013 Kazim is a Marmite player. You either like him or you don't. Yes he can sulk but he is also a big strong lad with pace and ball control. He is a bully and frightens defenders by running at them, particularly down the middle. We have nobody else who can do that. I exclude Best who I don't remember ever seeing play but when will he return and what will he be like when he returns? Remember Matt Jansen?
SydneyRover Posted January 30, 2013 Posted January 30, 2013 You can't really compare Jansens injury with Bests.
Al Posted January 31, 2013 Posted January 31, 2013 You can't really compare Jansens injury with Bests. I said that in an earlier quote but my point is that you never know how a bad injury affects a player, particularly a cruciate.
Andy Posted January 31, 2013 Posted January 31, 2013 Problem is, Best wasn't a fantastic player before the injury...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.