[Archived] Gary Bowyer

[Amo]

It really isn't.

Can you explain why time and again people target Singh rather than the lot of them?

Proof?

[Salgado Is A Hero]

It really isn't.

Can you explain why time and again people target Singh rather than the lot of them?

Do they? You always see people slagging off 'Shagnew'.

[T.J.Newton]

funny because there's a certain group of fans that only target agnew/shaw but don't ever have a negative word to say about Singh,

shagnew are horrid cretins and singh is just an imbecilic bs merchant-

enjoy!

[ABBEY]

No they don't. This is BRAG apologist rubbish.

I would walk 500 miles

Oh no I won't drive 200 miles

To see the rovers

I know your a long way away but FFs give it a rest and leave people alone who are locally trying to rid us of poison. Post your norks and your nips but give it a rest .... There's poison in the clubs veins and people are trying to suck it out .

funny because there's a certain group of fans that only target agnew/shaw but don't ever have a negative word to say about Singh,

shagnew are horrid cretins and singh is just an imbecilic bs merchant-

enjoy!

We need rid of EVERY bit of venky .

[Amo]

I know your a long way away but FFs give it a rest and leave people alone who are locally trying to rid us of poison. Post your norks and your nips but give it a rest .... There's poison in the clubs veins and people are trying to suck it out .

You seem to have something against people who aren't "local".

Which one are you?

[Amo]

funny because there's a certain group of fans that only target agnew/shaw but don't ever have a negative word to say about Singh,

Why would they bite the hand that feeds them?

[Guest Norbert]

Proof?

Sorry, I won't go down that road again. Just ignore this message.

[Stuart]

You seem to have something against people who aren't "local".

Which one are you?

Thought that was The Proclaimers at first glance - in response to the same Abbey post.

[Stuart]

To be fair Stu, this isn't true. Agnew and Shaw get pelters all the time, especially recently with the on-going court case. Singh gets attacked mostly whenever he spouts nonsense (which unfortunately for him and us is quite often).

Singh is regularly dredged up even between clown radio appearances - I see someone has posted a clip from a few years back. If you look carefully, it's a very small group if posters who even is the term Shagnew.

Singh has a bell round his neck, whereas others at the club sneak around very quietly in the shadows. But why the hell does Blackburn Rovers have two PNE fans in charge in the first place and how can anyone think this is a good idea?

[chaddyrovers]

Shaw and Agnew do get plenty of stick btw.

Shebby media skills are shocking and he makes himself and more important Rovers look clueless and amateurish.

[Stuart]

Shaw and Agnew do get plenty of stick btw.

Shebby media skills are shocking and he makes himself and more important Rovers look clueless and amateurish.

A very balance post there, clearly. Pretty much proved my point in one post.

Anything to say about Shaw and Agnew?

[chaddyrovers]

A very balance post there, clearly. Pretty much proved my point in one post.

Anything to say about Shaw and Agnew?

clueless aswell but dont make fools of themselves to the national or world media like a certain Global Advisor.

Stuart, are you Shebby Singh in real life?

are you a Shebby fan Stu? its ok to say so if you are?

[Stuart]

Well... you know, Chaddy...

[gumboots]

clueless aswell but dont make fools of themselves to the national or world media like a certain Global Advisor.

This is surely the point. they are all as bad as each other, but until recently with the Berg court case bringing Shaw into the spotlight, who knew what that pair were up to? If you stopped the proverbial man in the street - anyone who doesn't come on forums like this - I reckon they'd all know or have heard of singh, but wouldn't have a clue who Shaw and in particular Agnew were. Singh makes himself an easy target. Agnew is poisonously clever, always in the shadows, when Kean was here, controlling the press, and still now with his henchman Shaw to take the flak when there is any directed at them. Shaw is his shield. He, if the truth be known, is probably the worst of the lot, because of his obvious Kean links, but too clever to let it be seen by all and sundry

[Stuart]

This is surely the point. they are all as bad as each other, but until recently with the Berg court case bringing Shaw into the spotlight, who knew what that pair were up to? If you stopped the proverbial man in the street - anyone who doesn't come on forums like this - I reckon they'd all know or have heard of singh, but wouldn't have a clue who Shaw and in particular Agnew were. Singh makes himself an easy target. Agnew is poisonously clever, always in the shadows, when Kean was here, controlling the press, and still now with his henchman Shaw to take the flak when there is any directed at them. Shaw is his shield. He, if the truth be known, is probably the worst of the lot, because of his obvious Kean links, but too clever to let it be seen by all and sundry

+1

[RoyRover]

funny because there's a certain group of fans that only target agnew/shaw but don't ever have a negative word to say about Singh,

shagnew are horrid cretins and singh is just an imbecilic bs merchant-

enjoy!

Jason Brown looks like he wants to deck Shebby. I don't blame him. The guy talks the biggest pile of kean. The lying b@$t@rd.

[arbitro]

I think Gary deserves a great credit for changing the shape at half time by bringing Pedersen on for the disappointing Gomez. He saw during the first half that we were getting overrun in the central areas and made the change. This was pivotal for us and allowed Kane and Morris to get forward a lot more than they did in the first half. I would imagine that Gary is the type of manager that players would want to play for. It's a fine line between getting too close to the players and being a manager but so far he looks like he has got he balance right. The million dollar question is could he do this for a longer period with the mantle of manager attached to his name.

Gomez was pretty much a disaster yesterday and in truth looked completely lost and miles off the pace.

[chaddyrovers]

I think Gary deserves a great credit for changing the shape at half time by bringing Pedersen on for the disappointing Gomez. He saw during the first half that we were getting overrun in the central areas and made the change. This was pivotal for us and allowed Kane and Morris to get forward a lot more than they did in the first half. I would imagine that Gary is the type of manager that players would want to play for. It's a fine line between getting too close to the players and being a manager but so far he looks like he has got he balance right. The million dollar question is could he do this for a longer period with the mantle of manager attached to his name.

Gomez was pretty much a disaster yesterday and in truth looked completely lost and miles off the pace.

agree with all that.

Bowyer seems to give the payers confidence to go out and play to the best when we seen other managers not being able to do that.

Reckon Gomes will be gone in the summer.

No body can say Bowyer hasnt done a good job as caretaker manager. has he done enough to get the job perm? for me yeah. think he would bring through our talented Youngesters we got like Hugo Fernandez, John O'Sullivan and Anton Forrester, etc

[T4E]

We need to give him a contract and get on with planning for next season with some rare stability.

[Stuart]

We need to give him a contract and get on with planning for next season with some rare stability.

We definitely need stability. But to do that we need a new board, I'm afraid.

[ABBEY]

You seem to have something against people who aren't " localquote]

Far from it .. The thing I do object to is people'who are far away who constantly have snipes at people who are trying to rid us of the venkys and people who say you should boycott and not go to games who never go to games anyway .

[Howler]

Bowyer has saved our season and in the long run could have saved the club by keeping us up. I was skeptical that he could repeat the success of his first caretaker stint and am glad to be proven wrong.

He deserves a shot at being the manager if he wants it (unless we really can find someone with pedigree)....

[T4E]

We definitely need stability. But to do that we need a new board, I'm afraid.

Agreed, which is why we should tie GB down then address the real problems.

[chaddyrovers]

We definitely need stability. But to do that we need a new board, I'm afraid.

you arent gong to get a new board unless we get new owners or fans ownership of part of the club.

Bowyer will offer stability from the footballing side.

[Stuart]

you arent gong to get a new board unless we get new owners or fans ownership of part of the club.

Bowyer will offer stability from the footballing side.

Let's see what the aftermath of the Berg court case brings. If Berg wins and Shaw survives then they are either complicit or are not the real owners.

I suspect if he does survive there will be further revelations.