Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

[Archived] Berg at the High Court


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 767
  • Created
  • Last Reply

But will you apologise if everything proves you wrong?

wrong about what?(what isn't true in that post, mullan has a personal vendetta against Agnew and he's also blatantly been in cahoots with shabby this season, are these two things not true gobbybollards)

When was he ever right Abbey? ;)

and you can say for certain what/who is 100% right or wrong can you?

its all just a matter of opinion(largely based on rumor) and at least I'm capable of forming my own(right or wrong) instead of just latching onto the latest BS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's factual that rovers not only spoke to Benitez but deal was agreed only for him to pull out , bout 2 years back .

So not a gold moment after all

How about the time he told us he was certain Allardyce wouldn't be our next manager?

I'll give you a clue - he was appointed 2 days later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's factual that rovers not only spoke to Benitez but deal was agreed only for him to pull out , bout 2 years back .

So not a gold moment after all

It's not factual, it's only factual if it can be backed up with any evidence.

Philip said Benitez was definitely coming then attempted to present a scenario whereby Benitez had wriggled out of the alleged agreement. This state of affairs was not corroborated by any other source within the media or elsewhere.

Then again given Philip's increasingly incoherent ramblings over the last couple of years the Benitez claim is by no means one of his least believable claims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not factual, it's only factual if it can be backed up with any evidence.

It's absolutely amazing how many people think they can represent their claims as fact without wearing any burden of evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderation Lead

It's not factual, it's only factual if it can be backed up with any evidence.

Philip said Benitez was definitely coming then attempted to present a scenario whereby Benitez had wriggled out of the alleged agreement. This state of affairs was not corroborated by any other source within the media or elsewhere.

Then again given Philip's increasingly incoherent ramblings over the last couple of years the Benitez claim is by no means one of his least believable claims.

If you're waiting for Philipl to admit he's wrong, you might want to bring a book, as it will be a long (and probably fruitless) wait.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're waiting for Philipl to admit he's wrong, you might want to bring a book, as it will be a long (and probably fruitless) wait.....

I am very open when I get things wrong and have admitted as such on here.

I was right on Benitez, my point on Alonso was we had the resources to bid for him and my point on Ali Syed was for him to put the money in to prove his claims.

Seriously would we have been any worse off with Ali Syed plus £300m or even the £100m locked in at Rovers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You were right about Allardyce? About there being no imminent risk of unrest in Libya?

Your point on Alonso was that we should go for him as no one bigger would want him. You stand by that even now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am very open when I get things wrong and have admitted as such on here.

I was right on Benitez, my point on Alonso was we had the resources to bid for him and my point on Ali Syed was for him to put the money in to prove his claims.

Seriously would we have been any worse off with Ali Syed plus £300m or even the £100m locked in at Rovers?

You'd have to go ask a Racing Santander fan to get a proper response to that question. They are just slightly worse off that us at the minute.

Sounds like a choice between being burned to death or drowned to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Norbert

Shall I order you all matching handbags?

For what it is worth, I don't buy TJ's accusations about BRAG being in cahoots with Shebby, and they are at least working in their own time to find out what the hell is going on at the club. It would be very easy for people in my position to throw accusations and names at the Trust members, BRAG etc. but at least they are trying to do something, which is a lot more than most of us here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shall I order you all matching handbags?

For what it is worth, I don't buy TJ's accusations about BRAG being in cahoots with Shebby, and they are at least working in their own time to find out what the hell is going on at the club. It would be very easy for people in my position to throw accusations and names at the Trust members, BRAG etc. but at least they are trying to do something, which is a lot more than most of us here.

what position is that?

and it's more of an observation than an accusation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any news re the Berg hearing today?, Martin Blackburn reckons we will have to pay the full amount 2.2 m plus legal expenses. I agree that Berg should be paid compensation, but 2.2m.....Really??

I think Henning's taking the p*** a bit tbh, yeah I'm unhappy with the owners/politics but him taking this wont help us in any way, shape or form.....

Bad Elvis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Announcements

  • You can now add BlueSky, Mastodon and X accounts to your BRFCS Profile.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.