Roverthechimp Posted April 27, 2013 Posted April 27, 2013 Two small points: the employees that left all agreed to leave, it's not as easy to sack somebody as you might think. Secondly - did venkys check for any changes to the MD's contract before signing it...? Of course i'm not ruling out the conspiracy theories regarding hidden actors but i don't think it has to be that complicated.
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Stuart Posted April 27, 2013 Posted April 27, 2013 Mais bien sur with a circumflex on the u but my iPad won't do it.ûHold your finger on the 'u' for a second then slide onto the one you want.
perthblue02 Posted April 27, 2013 Posted April 27, 2013 He'll of a lot to come out , today's court case is just scratching at the surface . Many were beating the Shaw drum , I sincerely hope people are now having their eyes open . With tales of Sella , Hubert and Anderson yet to hit the press the FA are going to be ducking for cover . 18 months against all odds , we have worked round the clock with little sleep , neglected those we love for the truth and bit by bit the reality is beginning to hit home to those who doubted the supporters case and even those who doubted the motive behind taking these clowns on Is Sella the one who's mentioned in this? http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-06/football-investors-get-62-in-run-around-players-on-transfer-bet.html Also on the above link a good video of Scudamore pretending he gives a toss
gumboots Posted April 27, 2013 Posted April 27, 2013 û Hold your finger on the 'u' for a second then slide onto the one you want. Thanks only got given the I pad this week and am discovering what it can do and how to do it.
Stuart Posted April 27, 2013 Posted April 27, 2013 Thanks only got given the I pad this week and am discovering what it can do and how to do it. Have fun!
jw_ Posted April 27, 2013 Posted April 27, 2013 Question time: If Venkys truly do own all of Blackburn Rovers, then why on earth is Shebby Singh an employee of Venkys and not Blackburn Rovers? If you run over 100 companies, you'd surely want all the people working for you on the correct business payroll. That is, unless someone else has power at BRFC, and refused to employ Singh. I believe this to be one of the most important questions raised, however I doubt that we'll ever find out but I suspect that it was initially along the lines of reporting back (to Venkys) what is happening at Rovers but Singh got carried away with his own importance.
Baz Posted April 27, 2013 Posted April 27, 2013 Shebby is employed in India, because he wouldnt qualify to be employed under UK employment law (i.e. work permit).
philipl Posted April 28, 2013 Posted April 28, 2013 He could have got a full work permit in the UK last summer without any difficulty last summer if Venkys really wanted him to.
TBTF Posted April 28, 2013 Posted April 28, 2013 I believe this to be one of the most important questions raised, however I doubt that we'll ever find out but I suspect that it was initially along the lines of reporting back (to Venkys) what is happening at Rovers but Singh got carried away with his own importance. JW- Shebby is paid by BRFC not Venkys.This has been confirmed in many other threads. I am actually wondering whether the family Rao know anything about what has happened in this court case or even if they are that bothered.This looks to be a complete Shebby action and he's probably been told by the legal team to stay away so he cant be called as a witness and feck it up even more.There is just no logic as to why Shaw is still employed after a gaff like that .Its only 3 weeks since he was in India so why was it not dealt with then? It just looks to me as though Mrs Witch has let Shebby and Shelfboy slug it out between em. Is the whole thing not just another complete waste of money anyway? we look to have no chance of avoiding pay out to Berg so why is this even in court unless its Shebby attempt to destry Shaw and humiliate him in public? And you wouldnt have to try too hard to do that!! Problem is , its the name of the Club that is being trashed not that Shebby would worry too much on that score. The only thing we can all agree on is undisputedly the statement that it is out of control.
Blue Cabbage Posted April 28, 2013 Posted April 28, 2013 Are we likely to hear any 11 o'clockers tonight or have we to wait til what happens tomorrow?
Stuart Posted April 28, 2013 Posted April 28, 2013 Are we likely to hear any 11 o'clockers tonight or have we to wait til what happens tomorrow?Yeah, I reckon the judge will be on the blower to Nicko to share his thoughts on the matter so it can be included as 3 lines in the Football Spy section of tomorrow's Mirror.Chaddy will have a link for us at about 11:00.01s. That's if Bypass doesn't get there first on this thread, "Investigate or we'll publish", "Once we took over" and "Who owns Rovers" threads. (Sorry)
Blue Cabbage Posted April 28, 2013 Posted April 28, 2013 Yeah, I reckon the judge will be on the blower to Nicko to share his thoughts on the matter so it can be included as 3 lines in the Football Spy section of tomorrow's Mirror. Chaddy will have a link for us at about 11:00.01s. That's if Bypass doesn't get there first on this thread, "Investigate or we'll publish", "Once we took over" and "Who owns Rovers" threads. (Sorry) Ha ha suppose I was fair game for that, well played sir
BlueMonday Posted April 28, 2013 Posted April 28, 2013 Hugo Fernandez has found out the hard way apparently. ... Forgive my ignorance, whats this story.
RoverScot Posted April 29, 2013 Posted April 29, 2013 Charlie Croasdale @ch_croasdale1m Blackburn Rovers PLC ordered to pay Mr. Henning Berg the full amount owed following his dismissal. #BRFC appeal rejected by High Court judge
CapeTownRover Posted April 29, 2013 Posted April 29, 2013 Good, pay up Venkys for the incompetence of those who you have employed. We all hope that this will open up the eyes of Venkys(doubt it) and that they will get rid of Shagnew and Singh in order to get in people who know what they are doing(wont hold my breath)
RibbleValleyRover Posted April 29, 2013 Posted April 29, 2013 If the Contract of Employment stipulates what Berg was entitled to then this was always going to be the outcome and I have no problems with it. Clearly something went wrong in the process if they are contesting it, hopefully some heads might roll as a result.
PAFELL Posted April 29, 2013 Posted April 29, 2013 Was never in doubt really. Now lets see who's head roll for the mess.
RoverScot Posted April 29, 2013 Posted April 29, 2013 Derek is still 'out of control' and in de facto control of Blackburn Rovers. He is an unstoppable behemoth wreaking havoc wherever he goes. Damn, if only we had a Malaysian football pundit to stop him. If the Contract of Employment stipulates what Berg was entitled to then this was always going to be the outcome and I have no problems with it. Clearly something went wrong in the process if they are contesting it, hopefully some heads might roll as a result. The legal argument put forward by Rovers was literally the equivalent of Mrs Desai shouting 'it's not fair, Derek Shaw has cheated us' which unfortunately is not a defence in the last 100yrs of English Contract law.
T.J.Newton Posted April 29, 2013 Posted April 29, 2013 It will most likely be brushed under the carpet like it never happened.
RoverScot Posted April 29, 2013 Posted April 29, 2013 peter marshall @pmarshall016m Judge decides club's claim that MD didn't have authority to agree such generous severance terms were not "realistically arguable"
foreverrovers Posted April 29, 2013 Posted April 29, 2013 Berg will be paid and then the status quo will remain
rog of the rovers Posted April 29, 2013 Posted April 29, 2013 Goodbye Derek Shaw! If he survives this I'd be amazed
CapeTownRover Posted April 29, 2013 Posted April 29, 2013 Goodbye Derek Shaw! If he survives this I'd be amazed but Mrs D said she cant get rid of him, she doesnt know how to. He is a mad man, and out of control lol
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.