Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

[Archived] Berg at the High Court


Recommended Posts

Posted

I gotta say here i completely understand this. When i first became aware of them a few weeks ago, i also had the same questions, who had them, who created them and that is why they never went out 3-4 weeks ago because could we be sure? no we couldn't.

We had to ensure they were completely legit, where they have come from, the trail of how they got to us and the people who have confirmed in writing the legitimacy of them is enough for us to be able to publish them, in the knowledge that we can rebuff any implications.

We had to wait until we had that knowledge, had we had any doubts at all, believe me they wouldn't be up on the website right now.

Glad you understand. It's not personal. For the record, I've no doubt you've posted them completely believing them to be real.

  • Replies 767
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Personally, I'm looking forward to as many leaks as possible tumbling out of the whole rotten keanhouse.

I see no reason at this point to doubt authenticity.

And if it gets rid of Agnew I'll show my cock to the prostitute living 3 floors below me.

Posted

I see no reason at this point to doubt authenticity.

Do you have any reason to have 100% faith that they are genuine?

Posted

Why not give up the ghost PAFELL?

We've had several years of you're bullsh1t trying to discredit people?

BRAG may have made mistakes, but their intentions are good, i'm not sure you can say the same.

Can you point to any post on this subject where I have discredited folk. NO .You do post like an idiot at times.

Time you grew up.

Posted

Letter 1:

Date: March 7, 2013 10:57:16 PM GMT +8:00

Letter 2:

Sent: Fri Mar 08 07:49:59 2013

Why are those date and time formats different? Does that suggest they were sent from a different account or does that depend on the receiver? Genuine question - I don't know much about these things. Is India GMT +8:00??

Posted

I gotta say here i completely understand this. When i first became aware of them a few weeks ago, i also had the same questions, who had them? who created them? and that is why they never went out 3-4 weeks ago because could we be sure? no we couldn't.

We had to ensure they were completely legit, know where they have come from, the trail of how they got to us and the people who have confirmed in writing the legitimacy of them is now enough for us to be able to publish them, in the knowledge that we can rebuff any implications.

We had to wait until we had that knowledge, had we had any doubts at all, believe me they wouldn't be up on the website right now.

Fair post.

You can therefore understand why other folk are questioning them.

Posted

I'm not a party to any of these leaks, so I'm not going to vouchsafe for it.

I do understand your feelings about this, there's been so much flak and BS flying about the club, but the most logical explanation to me is that it is genuine, or at least, that Glen thinks it is genuine and is correct.

Either that or someone is yanking his chain. Or Glen's in on it. Sounds quite elaborate since isn't all of this going to come out in court anyway?

My mind isn't set in concrete, but at the moment if someone put a gun to my head and said "genuine or not?" I'd say "genuine".

But hey-ho this is Rovers we're talking about, so anything is possible.

Posted

Pune is 6.5 hours ahead. Balls, what am I talking about, 3.5 hours ahead.

Different formats in the dates reflect different regional settings in the e-mail clients, I think.

so either someone has a laptop that they are using in different continents or it's come from two different people. or one person has got two people to print these letters out for them.

Posted

I'm not a party to any of these leaks, so I'm not going to vouchsafe for it.

...and that's it in a nutshell.

In the words of Edgar Allan Poe - "Believe half of what you see, and none of what you hear".

Pune is 6.5 hours ahead. Balls, what am I talking about, 3.5 hours ahead.

Different formats in the dates reflect different regional settings in the e-mail clients, I think.

so either someone has a laptop that they are using in different continents or it's come from two different people. or one person has got two people to print these letters out for them.

Google says its 3:15 in Pune right now. That's 4 1/2 hours where I come from.

Posted

Letter 1:

Date: March 7, 2013 10:57:16 PM GMT +8:00

Letter 2:

Sent: Fri Mar 08 07:49:59 2013

Why are those date and time formats different? Does that suggest they were sent from a different account or does that depend on the receiver? Genuine question - I don't know much about these things. Is India GMT +8:00??

I wonder if Mrs D has access to more than one secretary? Maybe with over 150 companies to look after.

Posted

Pune is 6.5 hours ahead. Balls, what am I talking about, 3.5 hours ahead.

Different formats in the dates reflect different regional settings in the e-mail clients, I think.

so either someone has a laptop that they are using in different continents or it's come from two different people. or one person has got two people to print these letters out for them.

Could it be two sources? One based in India one over here?

Posted

Clocks have just gone forward - A-HA!

I don't think they work on daylight saving time in India.

So at the time of the mails, it was 3.5.

Please correct me if I am wrong in any sense sir, as they say down Pune way.

Posted

Letter 1:

Date: March 7, 2013 10:57:16 PM GMT +8:00

Letter 2:

Sent: Fri Mar 08 07:49:59 2013

Why are those date and time formats different? Does that suggest they were sent from a different account or does that depend on the receiver? Genuine question - I don't know much about these things. Is India GMT +8:00??

Been thinking about this. Malaysia is currently 7 hours ahead of us. However in late March we changed to BST here. Malaysia don't employ Daylight Savings Time changes - so in early March they would have been GMT + 8.

Now, who do we know from Malaysia.....

Posted

Personally, I'm looking forward to as many leaks as possible tumbling out of the whole rotten keanhouse.

I see no reason at this point to doubt authenticity.

And if it gets rid of Agnew I'll show my cock to the prostitute living 3 floors below me.

Totally with you on this.

As for the prostitute, they usually have a good sense of humour ! so I'm told.

Posted

Been thinking about this. Malaysia is currently 7 hours ahead of us. However in late March we changed to BST here. Malaysia don't employ Daylight Savings Time changes - so in early March they would have been GMT + 8.

Now, who do we know from Malaysia.....

With a grudge against Shaw and close links with BRAG? I can't think of anyone.

Guest Norbert
Posted

She's probably only 32, but had 'a long paper round' to put it politely.

Posted

Been thinking about this. Malaysia is currently 7 hours ahead of us. However in late March we changed to BST here. Malaysia don't employ Daylight Savings Time changes - so in early March they would have been GMT + 8.

Now, who do we know from Malaysia.....

Well it wasn't my missus or family - she is from there. (though her family do know Shebby Singh - their opinion on him is unprintable here)

Posted

As for the prostitute, they usually have a good sense of humour ! so I'm told.

I used to live above a dominatrix in Bolton. I very often could hear her laughing loudly.

She used to nip up for a coffee and a chat after she'd finished work, wicked sense of humour

Posted

Glen and BRFCAG, why have you put these letters into the public domain??? what are your motives and raesons for doing so???

thought it was end of the season all this???

Damned when they do, damned when they don't.

Thank you Glen and Mark for all your hard work on our behalf.

How do you know you are not being set up by the source.

Yep, no credit due to BRAG for this!!!!

Posted

What do people expect to come from this email? The only thing it seems to show to me is that Shebby is winning his power struggle with Shaw.

Posted

Can't believe people are criticising Glen for this. They wouldn't put them up without being 100% sure they are real.

Does anyone really think Mrs D sits there writing her own emails? She'll have some lackey type them up from her dictations, which would explain the poor grammar.

Makes you wonder what the real purpose was of going over last week? With Bowyer as well?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.