Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

[Archived] Extra ! Extra ! Read All About It !


Recommended Posts

  • Backroom

Percentage-wise is why it is a racism problem. If the ratio of unarmed black or white men was similar to the population, the issue is a simple change in police procedure.

As the percentage of black people is higher, it is a racism issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Percentage-wise is why it is a racism problem. If the ratio of unarmed black or white men was similar to the population, the issue is a simple change in police procedure.

As the percentage of black people is higher, it is a racism issue.

This is not actually the complete picture.

50% of police shootings are white, 26% black and the balance Hispanic/other.

Factor in the crime rate by race, and the 26% of black shootings is statistically appropriate (though factually unfortunate).

White officers are less likely to shoot a black suspect, than are black officers.

For these and other interesting statistics, feel free to read:

http://www.dailywire.com/news/7264/5-statistics-you-need-know-about-cops-killing-aaron-bandler#

That said:

1. I support law enforcement.

2. But police are being militarized and we need to reverse that progress. I'd be perfectly happy if they all carried revolvers with the heavy equipment reserved for SWAT. We should also remove financial incentives to the police seizing property.

3. The situation in some parts of the world (no go areas, the militarization of drug cartels, etc) make it difficult for the police to demilitarize.

4. Police who commit murder should be treated like anyone else.

5. All of the above being said, Black Lives Matters is a crock. All Lives Matter, including Blue Lives, Black Lives, Brown Lives, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Backroom

This is not actually the complete picture.

50% of police shootings are white, 26% black and the balance Hispanic/other.

Factor in the crime rate by race, and the 26% of black shootings is statistically appropriate (though factually unfortunate).

White officers are less likely to shoot a black suspect, than are black officers.

For these and other interesting statistics, feel free to read:

http://www.dailywire.com/news/7264/5-statistics-you-need-know-about-cops-killing-aaron-bandler#

That said:

1. I support law enforcement.

2. But police are being militarized and we need to reverse that progress. I'd be perfectly happy if they all carried revolvers with the heavy equipment reserved for SWAT. We should also remove financial incentives to the police seizing property.

3. The situation in some parts of the world (no go areas, the militarization of drug cartels, etc) make it difficult for the police to demilitarize.

4. Police who commit murder should be treated like anyone else.

5. All of the above being said, Black Lives Matters is a crock. All Lives Matter, including Blue Lives, Black Lives, Brown Lives, etc.

I can get behind all those as a compromise between our views :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not actually the complete picture.

50% of police shootings are white, 26% black and the balance Hispanic/other.

Factor in the crime rate by race, and the 26% of black shootings is statistically appropriate (though factually unfortunate).

White officers are less likely to shoot a black suspect, than are black officers.

For these and other interesting statistics, feel free to read:

http://www.dailywire.com/news/7264/5-statistics-you-need-know-about-cops-killing-aaron-bandler#

That said:

1. I support law enforcement.

2. But police are being militarized and we need to reverse that progress. I'd be perfectly happy if they all carried revolvers with the heavy equipment reserved for SWAT. We should also remove financial incentives to the police seizing property.

3. The situation in some parts of the world (no go areas, the militarization of drug cartels, etc) make it difficult for the police to demilitarize.

4. Police who commit murder should be treated like anyone else.

5. All of the above being said, Black Lives Matters is a crock. All Lives Matter, including Blue Lives, Black Lives, Brown Lives, etc.

It all really comes back down to the gun law debate, less guns in general circulation IMO means less nervous/ trigger happy cops, in the UK cops are far less likely to draw a gun on someone who has robbed a supermarket, as the chances that person has a gun are much less.

I don't disagree with any of your other points, and I think that point 4 in particular would help settle the outrage over some of the pretty obvious cover-ups seen in the past few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Five killed by a gunman in a Washington mall.

Gunman was originally reported as Hispanic, turns out he's actually Turkish. No motive known. :rolleyes:

Correct. He was a Turkish immigrant. Motive still unknown?

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/person-custody-washington-mall-shooting-killed-5-n653931

A cartoonist is killed in Jordan for insulting Islam. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/26/world/middleeast/nahed-hattar-jordanian-writer-killed.html?_r=1

Why do we import these people?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obama has always been 'just one letter away'.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/715977/al-nusra-us-arming-jihadists-syria

Worst President EVER!

An Al-Nusra millitant isn't exactly the most credible source.

But if true, the Obama admin wouldn't be the first to do something like this. I'm pretty sure it's an impeachable offence for a US President NOT to indirectly arm and fund shady dissidents fighting an unfriendly dictator.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the repairs to the Houses of Parliament costing a minimum of £7bn, does anyone else feel it's a great opportunity to move them out of central London?

They could be re-located to a somewhere more geographically central, at a much lower cost, and somewhere where the housing costs for the public paying their mortgages would be significantly lower.

I'm sure the buildings themselves would be very attractive for property developers.

The Scottish Parliament building cost £414m to give a comparison.

I have to say moving parliament and ministries out of London looks like extremely good sense to me.

London is in a full blown crisis at the moment. Too few houses, too many people, cost of living way too high for those not on £50k+. Drastic times call for drastic measures. Moving parliament to Manchester, Birmingham or Leeds would be transformational for London and the region it relocates to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An Al-Nusra millitant isn't exactly the most credible source.

I know. But even more ludicrous is that the mainstream media constantly pass off reports on Syria from a pseudo terrorist based on a council estate in Coventry as facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Backroom

I'd agree, though part of me appreciates the great gothic masterpiece that is the Parliament building. The new building would be some really tedious glass and steel thing that would look like 30,000 other buildings.

New building? They should just use regular office space instead of feeling like they're above the rest of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.