Husky Posted October 18, 2016 Posted October 18, 2016 BBC are terrible with their 'pro-Islamic' stuff too. Last night on the mainstream TV news they only gave 9 seconds to the Rotherham abuse case - and not surprisingly no photos and no names mentioned. Had to go digging on their website to find the story http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-37682136 Yet a guy in another continent says a few sexist things and it's all over the front page. DISGRACEFUL!
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
jim mk2 Posted October 18, 2016 Posted October 18, 2016 Editorial judgment: what's more important, Rotherham case that's been going on for ages or the US presidential election and probably the most controversial candidate in history ? Nothing to with bias and to say the BBC is pro-Islamic is nonsense.
Husky Posted October 18, 2016 Posted October 18, 2016 Nothing to with bias and to say the BBC is pro-Islamic is nonsense. Why no names or photos? That's normally standard procedure.
adopted scouser Posted October 19, 2016 Author Posted October 19, 2016 Look at all those poor women and child-...ooh. Watched 'The night that changed Germany's attitude to refugees' (YouTube). The events in Cologne following Merkel's open door policy, unbelievable stuff. Should have shot them
Amo Posted October 19, 2016 Posted October 19, 2016 Like I said, Germany lost its balls. After all that collective guilt we dumped on them after WW2, it's not really surprising.
ABBEY Posted October 19, 2016 Posted October 19, 2016 facial recognition says..... imagine your 14 or 15 year old daughter sitting next to these chiildren!
yoda Posted October 19, 2016 Posted October 19, 2016 Like I said, Germany lost its balls. After all that collective guilt we dumped on them after WW2, it's not really surprising. I though it was the 3rd Reich that was guilty
Steve Kean's Hypnotoad Posted October 19, 2016 Posted October 19, 2016 Dental checks not gonna happen on Calais migrants. Pardon my French but why the **** not? The whole reasoning for this concession is to be charitable and get some kids out of the squalor if France aren't gonna do it, with the idea that kids can be educated with British values and integrated here a lot more easily than adults can. The cut off age should have been 16 and we should be checking! It's totally ludicrous, anyone under the age of about 30 looks set to get in in a ridiculous reverse approach than say buying alcohol. Well done Tory government, you've opened up a bit window of light at the end of the Calais migration approach tunnel and the jungle will triple in size now, unless France actually dismantle it in which case it'll just pop up elsewhere on the coast. They've shown an incredible and disappointing lack of foresight and backbone in not strictly restricting this to genuine kids. Is this the Tories idea of taking the centre ground or does literally no mainstream party give a damn about controlling immigration and getting that 300,000 a year (net only!) figure down.
Baz Posted October 19, 2016 Posted October 19, 2016 Dental checks not gonna happen on Calais migrants. Pardon my French but why the **** not? The whole reasoning for this concession is to be charitable and get some kids out of the squalor if France aren't gonna do it, with the idea that kids can be educated with British values and integrated here a lot more easily than adults can. The cut off age should have been 16 and we should be checking! It's totally ludicrous, anyone under the age of about 30 looks set to get in in a ridiculous reverse approach than say buying alcohol. Well done Tory government, you've opened up a bit window of light at the end of the Calais migration approach tunnel and the jungle will triple in size now, unless France actually dismantle it in which case it'll just pop up elsewhere on the coast. They've shown an incredible and disappointing lack of foresight and backbone in not strictly restricting this to genuine kids. Is this the Tories idea of taking the centre ground or does literally no mainstream party give a damn about controlling immigration and getting that 300,000 a year (net only!) figure down. When even the most right wing conservative government in 50 years isnt far right enough for you, maybe thats a hint that your views arent mainstream?
yoda Posted October 19, 2016 Posted October 19, 2016 When even the most right wing conservative government in 50 years isnt far right enough for you, maybe thats a hint that your views arent mainstream? You might want to review that post when one of those "children" attacks someone in the UK
jim mk2 Posted October 19, 2016 Posted October 19, 2016 You might want to review that post when they become model citizens.
Baz Posted October 19, 2016 Posted October 19, 2016 You might want to review that post when one of those "children" attacks someone in the UK As far as i can see the government has ruled out age tests based on teeth, because the British dental council has said it's inaccurate. Age checks through other measures will be carried out. What is wrong with that?
Husky Posted October 20, 2016 Posted October 20, 2016 I agree. Any migration news has a picture of some upset children, women or families. Any IS bombing campaign news has a picture of some civilians cowering or staring disconsolately at a bombed house. Pro-Islam BBC had a photo of 2 young children (and not the 30 year old types) - "fleeing Mosul" as it's homepage headline news all day today. What's that got to do with the UK? Anyone would think a woman hadn't just been stabbed to death by a 'gang of 11 men' in the broad daylight of Newcastle, UK. Or is murder by stabbing so commonplace in Modern Britain that it's hardly headline news stuff any more? Why no pictures of aggressive young men destroying property or attacking lorries or security guards? Why none of IS military bases going up in smoke (sure they can get hold of the odd aerial photo from the military). You don't even get the latter some of the time, you have to hunt it out on YouTube if you want to know what's actually going on. There's a definite leftist agenda in large sections of the mainstream media. And then you get people saying they're all right wing, baffling. I remember seeing one particular disgraceful piece of propaganda several months ago on the mainstream TV news where they showed an edited video of a truck driver 'swerving towards migrants'. I'd actually seen the full version on Youtube earlier that day where the "refugees" had been throwing rocks at his truck and smashing the back doors in of others. Anyway, like you said. Why don't they ever show what's really going on? Once again, look at all those poor women and children. It's enough to make Lily Allen drown in her own fake tears. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RSOkdrzYJg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOkRfYHYJU8
Steve Kean's Hypnotoad Posted October 20, 2016 Posted October 20, 2016 Pro-Islam BBC had a photo of 2 young children (and not the 30 year old types) - "fleeing Mosul" as it's homepage headline news all day today. What's that got to do with the UK? Anyone would think a woman hadn't just been stabbed to death by a 'gang of 11 men' in the broad daylight of Newcastle, UK. Or is murder by stabbing so commonplace in Modern Britain that it's hardly headline news stuff any more? Oh they love a good "fleeing" the BBC. Any migrant who has ever moved anywhere has fled as far as they're concerned. Fleeing areas of North Africa not even in conflict, fleeing Turkey to get into the rest of Europe, fleeing France to get to Britain. It's so basic and childishly manipulative it's just embarassing. "If we always say fleeing, people will think migrants have no choice but to come here". I notice they rarely report on Jews fleeing Europe, Christians fleeing Northern Nigeria/Sudan/ Egypt, secularists fleeing Turkey (on no, Erdogan threw them all in prison before they could flee). I'm moving offices at work tomorrow. Might get in touch with the BBC and ask them if they want to do a report on me fleeing my old one.
jim mk2 Posted October 20, 2016 Posted October 20, 2016 People "flee" conflict, war, oppression, famine (if they have the strength to move) - anything that is a danger to themselves of their family. It's a journalistic expression used by all media. Goodness knows, the BBC has problems with its constant pandering to this government but to use a common word as another means of knocking it is pathetic. Good luck with the move - ring the local BBC radio station and if there's any reporters left who have survived the latest cutbacks they'll do a live interview.
ABBEY Posted October 20, 2016 Posted October 20, 2016 You might want to review that post when they become model citizens.Just like the model citizens in cologne and Stuttgart
yoda Posted October 20, 2016 Posted October 20, 2016 You might want to review that post when they become model citizens. If Jim. The word is IF
ABBEY Posted October 20, 2016 Posted October 20, 2016 So those attacks on women by Muslims didn't happen and it was all made up .do you think that the ones who got off the bus at Croydon where children ? Who are you Gary linekers mate ? Pah Gary lineker and morals ha ha
yoda Posted October 20, 2016 Posted October 20, 2016 I didn't say they didn't happen. I was spelling out that the hysteria is profitable. Accentuating it by accepting the easy tabloid or Facebook, click bait stuff is the issue I had with the posts. There is a percentage of every culture, nationality, religious group etc who are despicable. Name a job, name a time, name a place- the government, BBC and church in the past 100 years, are three we could name who ALL have responsibility for absolutely deplorable acts towards children. Does that mean all white Christians males are paedophiles? If it does, what's going to happen when 2million expats are forced home through brexit...... The point you and others are making about immigration completely ignores the huge percentage who are actually refugees, who require help and if we look deep enough - are in that position due to bad decisions made in the west. It might be hard to accept - but I've seen first hand some of the children moving here from parts of the Middle East or parts of Ukraine etc. In nearly all cases they've put many of our local children to shame - through absolute respect for another chance at basic existence! Morals indeed. 1st highlight, complete speculation 2nd highlight, the huge percentage are economic migrants, hence the UK governments stand on taking them from Calais
Amo Posted October 20, 2016 Posted October 20, 2016 I though it was the 3rd Reich that was guilty WW2 was a @#/?-up war with atrocities committed on both sides. You just don't hear so much about them because "history is written by the victors".
ABBEY Posted October 20, 2016 Posted October 20, 2016 I didn't say they didn't happen. I was spelling out that the hysteria is profitable. Accentuating it by accepting the easy tabloid or Facebook, click bait stuff is the issue I had with the posts. There is a percentage of every culture, nationality, religious group etc who are despicable. Name a job, name a time, name a place- the government, BBC and church in the past 100 years, are three we could name who ALL have responsibility for absolutely deplorable acts towards children. Does that mean all white Christians males are paedophiles? If it does, what's going to happen when 2million expats are forced home through brexit...... The point you and others are making about immigration completely ignores the huge percentage who are actually refugees, who require help and if we look deep enough - are in that position due to bad decisions made in the west. It might be hard to accept - but I've seen first hand some of the children moving here from parts of the Middle East or parts of Ukraine etc. In nearly all cases they've put many of our local children to shame - through absolute respect for another chance at basic existence! Morals indeed. Would you be happy if you had a 14 year old daughter to have a "14" year old child refugee ( who is probably 25-35 years old ) boyfriend who sits next to her in school .
Baz Posted October 20, 2016 Posted October 20, 2016 Would you be happy if you had a 14 year old daughter to have a "14" year old child refugee ( who is probably 25-35 years old ) boyfriend who sits next to her in school . They have only ruled out aging these children on dental records, because the technology isnt accurate enough to determine their age. So they are using other methods. If they can verify they are children, they will proceed with the refugee process, if not then they wont be at school with your daughter. Would you be happy if there was a genuine 14 year old refugee who your daughter wanted to date?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.