This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
ABBEY Posted August 1, 2015 Posted August 1, 2015 Hopefully Rhodes will stay as he is a big part of the team as is a true hero to the club the favroute club to buy him is middlesbourogh. is it a risk to sell to anothor championship team? WTF
chaddyrovers Posted August 1, 2015 Posted August 1, 2015 Will start today according to reports. So I believe. Rhodes will do what he does best. Score goals
Baz Posted August 1, 2015 Posted August 1, 2015 shocking that someone who is/was? a prominent trust chap doesn't know who Wickham is. The same person didn't know Yeovil were in our division a couple of years back. Certainly doesn't fill you with any confidence. Bit personal and unnecessary Abs.
LewisF Posted August 1, 2015 Posted August 1, 2015 I don't think it was anything personal, just a little criticism
Feniscowles Blue Posted August 1, 2015 Posted August 1, 2015 Especially when Paul was trying to say Rhodes is worth more than Wickham when he don't know who he is
G Somerset Rover Posted August 1, 2015 Posted August 1, 2015 Will start today according to reports.Bloody hope so. As I said in the Wigan thread, it will indicate that he's happy to still knuckle down if he's playing today, despite having his head turned.
Baz Posted August 1, 2015 Posted August 1, 2015 Why? Its hardly shocking that Paul hasnt heard of a striker who has hardly played or scored at a low ranked PL side. Regarding the comments about Paul being involved in the trust, I fail to see the link. If the trust where ever in a position of owning the club then they would appoint executives to run the club, so even if paul was a prominent member of the trust (and I don't know if he is), then knowledge of Sunderlands subs bench wouldn't be his remit. Thats why I think it was a bit of a dig. At least Paul has secured Ewood as a asset of community value.
ABBEY Posted August 1, 2015 Posted August 1, 2015 Its hardly shocking that Paul hasnt heard of a striker who has hardly played or scored at a low ranked PL side. Regarding the comments about Paul being involved in the trust, I fail to see the link. If the trust where ever in a position of owning the club then they would appoint executives to run the club, so even if paul was a prominent member of the trust (and I don't know if he is), then knowledge of Sunderlands subs bench wouldn't be his remit. Thats why I think it was a bit of a dig. At least Paul has secured Ewood as a asset of community value. played regular for England U21. paul has plenty of "digs" at me ,Are you Terry McCann?
Baz Posted August 1, 2015 Posted August 1, 2015 played regular for England U21. paul has plenty of "digs" at me ,Are you Terry McCann? Who?
Paul Posted August 1, 2015 Posted August 1, 2015 really ? you have not heard of Wickham? wow! The same CW who single handedly beat Chelsea to keep Sunderland up the season before last??? As I've explained before I don't watch PL football at all. I'm interested in the league in which Rovers play so I have no idea what is happening in the PL. I couldn't even tell you who plays for England. I'm not interested. Just like I'm not interested in NFL, boxing, cricket or wrestling. Now that may be difficult to understand for some but it's what I do. shocking that someone who is/was? a prominent trust chap doesn't know who Wickham is. The same person didn't know Yeovil were in our division a couple of years back. Certainly doesn't fill you with any confidence. ABBEY when I was a kid Yeovil were "the" non-league team everyone talked about. If you go back and read my post on that matter you'll see I was expressing surprise at how far Yeovil had come because I didn't know as i don't follow non-league football. As usual though you didn't actually read what was written Especially when Paul was trying to say Rhodes is worth more than Wickham when he don't know who he is ABBEY, Feniscowles can I suggest you read my post thoroughly. A comment was made that Sunderland had sold Wickham for £9m. I spent some time reading about Wickham's career - it seemed reasonable to get some facts before making a comment - and discovered his career goals ratio is one goal in six games. What I then went on to say was if a striker with a 1 in 6 ratio is worth £9m then a striker with a goal ratio of 1 in 2 games (its actually slightly less, therefore better) should be worth considerably more. Do I think Rhodes is worth £12m? No. BUT the market place tells me a 1 in 6 striker is worth £9m, it is therefore quite logical to argue a striker with a ratio of 1 in 2 should be worth significantly more albeit he doesn't have PL experience. Last season Wickham scored six times in 40 games, Rhodes scored 21 in 47. Which one would you like to play for Rovers? I hope that clarifies my point.
Coatbridge rover Posted August 1, 2015 Posted August 1, 2015 I'm in the mill hill pub enjoying a dram.I've read Rhodes is off to Sunderland and Kean was on 10k a week.You English do Bullshit with a capital B
ABBEY Posted August 1, 2015 Posted August 1, 2015 As I've explained before I don't watch PL football at all. I'm interested in the league in which Rovers play so I have no idea what is happening in the PL. I couldn't even tell you who plays for England. I'm not interested. Just like I'm not interested in NFL, boxing, cricket or wrestling. Now that may be difficult to understand for some but it's what I do. ABBEY when I was a kid Yeovil were "the" non-league team everyone talked about. If you go back and read my post on that matter you'll see I was expressing surprise at how far Yeovil had come because I didn't know as i don't follow non-league football. As usual though you didn't actually read what was written ABBEY, Feniscowles can I suggest you read my post thoroughly. A comment was made that Sunderland had sold Wickham for £9m. I spent some time reading about Wickham's career - it seemed reasonable to get some facts before making a comment - and discovered his career goals ratio is one goal in six games. What I then went on to say was if a striker with a 1 in 6 ratio is worth £9m then a striker with a goal ratio of 1 in 2 games (its actually slightly less, therefore better) should be worth considerably more. Do I think Rhodes is worth £12m? No. BUT the market place tells me a 1 in 6 striker is worth £9m, it is therefore quite logical to argue a striker with a ratio of 1 in 2 should be worth significantly more albeit he doesn't have PL experience. Last season Wickham scored six times in 40 games, Rhodes scored 21 in 47. Which one would you like to play for Rovers? I hope that clarifies my point. Hes played neatly 100 games in rovers division !
Jock Posted August 1, 2015 Posted August 1, 2015 I'm in the mill hill pub enjoying a dram.I've read Rhodes is off to Sunderland and Kean was on 10k a week.You English do Bullshit with a capital BTell everyone in the pub that.
ABBEY Posted August 1, 2015 Posted August 1, 2015 I'm in the mill hill pub enjoying a dram.I've read Rhodes is off to Sunderland and Kean was on 10k a week.You English do Bullshit with a capital Bgo back to BBurnley then with a capital F and O
Coatbridge rover Posted August 1, 2015 Posted August 1, 2015 Well I'm just shocked and your not a nice man 👨 abbey.how's the grass cutting going Ps the goalie
yoda Posted August 1, 2015 Posted August 1, 2015 Well I'm just shocked and your not a nice man abbey.how's the grass cutting going Ps the goalie Your are beginning to sound like Ranoff Westwood
RevidgeBlue Posted August 1, 2015 Posted August 1, 2015 I think Paul's point quite obviously was that if a non - scoring lump like Wickham is valued at 9m that must make Rhodes worth about 20m to a Premiership Club. (Although I'm surprised he hasn't heard of him either ) On the bright side, must make Brown worth about 7m! Your are beginning to sound like Ranoff Westwood Don't think so he had some style and a sense of humour. Not just unfunny trolling.
eve0333 Posted August 1, 2015 Posted August 1, 2015 I don't see they have any choice now but to accept boros bid as long as it reaches their valuation They have a hard choice but i think he has to stay he is a legend/hero to the club we need him! I think Gary will let him go but hopefully not Gestede too he has to stay we cant have both of are betst strikers leave! They say maybe to middlesbourough but is it a risk to sell to anothor team in the championship!
Amo Posted August 1, 2015 Posted August 1, 2015 I think Gary will let him go but hopefully not Gestede too he has to stay we cant have both of are betst strikers leave! Um... How do I tell you this...
ABBEY Posted August 1, 2015 Posted August 1, 2015 They have a hard choice but i think he has to stay he is a legend/hero to the club we need him! I think Gary will let him go but hopefully not Gestede too he has to stay we cant have both of are betst strikers leave! They say maybe to middlesbourough but is it a risk to sell to anothor team in the championship! Do I need to tell you the Easter bunny ain't real dude ?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.