jim mk2 Posted July 29, 2015 Posted July 29, 2015 MIDDLESBROUGH FAN MADE MONKEY GESTURES, BLACKBURN PLAYERS TELL COURT Press Association 2015 Three black Blackburn Rovers players have told a court that a Middlesbrough supporter made monkey gestures towards them after one of them scored a controversial goal. Lee Williamson, Rudy Gestede and Markus Olsson each told Teesside Magistrates Court how a man in the crowd made the gestures at the end of a match at the Riverside Stadium, in Middlesbrough, on March 29, last year . A district judge heard how Gestede scored a 94th minute equaliser that deprived the home team of two points and second place in the Championship . Prosecutor Paul Power said the goal was also contentious because the home fans believed their goalkeeper had been fouled and Gestede was the "pantomime villain". Mr Power was opening the case against Ernest Goult, 72. Goult, of Redcar, denies a racially aggravated public order offence and an alternative charge of using threatening or abusive words or behaviour or disorderly behaviour likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress. Lee Williamson told the court that the incident unfolded after Gestede scored his injury time equaliser for Blackburn and the game finished almost immediately. The player, who was the Rovers' captain on that evening, said the match ended and he and his team passed Middlesbrough fans on their way to applaud their own supporters. He said: "On the way to our fans I see a Middlesbrough fan making monkey gestures towards me." The player then demonstrated a one-armed gesture under his arm pit. He said the man did it four or five times "I felt upset," Williamson said. Asked what he felt the gesture meant, he said: "Implying that I'm a monkey." The player confirmed he took it to be a racist gesture. Williamson said the supporter also made a "w***** sign" towards him. Gestede said he saw the man doing the gesture about 10 times. He said: "He was shouting and doing the gesture." Gestede said he got angry and went towards the supporter but was told to calm down by a colleague. Amy Dixon, defending, asked the player whether the gesture could mean "you're the pits, you're rubbish". Gestede replied: "No". He agreed with Mr Power that he was the "pantomime villain" after his injury time goal that deprived Middlesbrough of two points. Olsson told the court: "It was like a monkey gesture and he wasn't trying to hide it. "He was doing it towards a black person and it was obvious what it meant. I have seen it before. It is very offensive. It was clear what he did." The player said he was not concerned about the w***** gesture. "It's something we see every week," he said. Pc Christopher Hilton said: "The gesture I saw, I would perceive that to be a racist gesture towards the players." The officer said Goult contacted police after Cleveland Police released a picture of the man they wanted to talk to. In interviews read to the court, Goult said in a prepared statement that he was not a racist and the gesture was an established Teesside expression meaning "the pits". Pc Hilton told the court: "As a football fan and watching football matches, I have never heard of that. "When I Googled it, nothing came back in relation to a Teesside gesture - the pits." Another officer, Pc Tim Swales, said that he had been watching Middlesbrough since he was ten and policing football matches for 16 years. He said he had never seen the gesture used in the way Goult described in his statement. Goult, who will give evidence later, sat in the court listening to the evidence and watching video footage of some of his gestures. He is grey haired, with a grey beard and was wearing a black suit, white shirt and a patterned tie. Great-grandfather Goult said he had been a Middlesbrough fan since 1950. He said he made a gesture after making eye contact with one of the Blackburn players. The retired steelworker demonstrated what he did by tapping his armpit twice as he gave evidence. "Mr Gestede and I, our eyes met," he said. "I raised my left hand and went one-two, one-two." Goult said what he did was an "old Teesside gesture". "It means you're under the arm of the pit," he said. The defendant said: "It was not so much the goal going in. Since the goalkeeper had been injured, I got a feeling of ... you know ... I wasn't very happy." He said: "I just wanted to convey to them what an unsatisfactory point they'd earned." Mrs Dixon asked Goult whether he intended to express racial hatred. He replied: "Not at all. The fact the three chaps happened to be black, it didn't register. The whole lot could have come over." His solicitor asked him if he was racist. He said: "Not in the slightest."
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
perthblue02 Posted July 29, 2015 Posted July 29, 2015 DJ Harmes gave Goult a three-year football banning order, and ordered he pay a £600 fine, £600 costs and a £60 victim surcharge. http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/live-blackburn-rovers-players-trial-9431671#ICID=sharebar_twitter
LewisF Posted July 29, 2015 Posted July 29, 2015 DJ Harmes gave Goult a three-year football banning order, and ordered he pay a £600 fine, £600 costs and a £60 victim surcharge.[/size] http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/live-blackburn-rovers-players-trial-9431671#ICID=sharebar_twitter[/size] Good. One less nob head going to matches
Backroom Mike E Posted July 29, 2015 Backroom Posted July 29, 2015 Boro have a poor rep re: Rovers now. This racism incident, the alleged journos with broken car windows, and an incident from a couple years ago where a bunch of smoggy 8yos were calling Rovers fans 'pakis'...all of whom were white. Idiots.
onlyonejackwalker Posted July 29, 2015 Posted July 29, 2015 72 years of age. Different eras. Dinosaurs.
Leonard Venkhater Posted July 29, 2015 Posted July 29, 2015 My client asks me to tell the court that here in this part of the world that gesture means "You are the pits" Hahahaha.......and I am Napoleon Bonaparte!!
LewisF Posted July 29, 2015 Posted July 29, 2015 "The pits"? Really? What a @#/? terrible excuse for racism
thenodrog Posted July 29, 2015 Posted July 29, 2015 Ridiculous. The case should never have got to court. Boro should have banned him for the 3 years and thats that.
perthblue02 Posted July 29, 2015 Posted July 29, 2015 My client asks me to tell the court that here in this part of the world that gesture means "You are the pits" Hahahaha.......and I am Napoleon Bonaparte!! Once saw a monkey ( well a chimp ) at the zoo doing the "pits"gesture with one arm, it was what he was doing with the other that would have got him banned
yoda Posted July 29, 2015 Posted July 29, 2015 They have history with monkeys and Frenchmen in that part of the world
Mike Graham Posted July 29, 2015 Posted July 29, 2015 I recall 2 youngish Rovers fans (one from Chorley and one from Leyland) a few years back (5 or 6) doing similar to Dwight Yorke. They got banned and fined.
Leonard Venkhater Posted July 29, 2015 Posted July 29, 2015 Once saw a monkey ( well a chimp ) at the zoo doing the "pits"gesture with one arm, it was what he was doing with the other that would have got him banned Hahaha Took the kids to Knowsley Safari Park once and there were two Karanka's' on the car bonnet!
frosty Posted July 29, 2015 Posted July 29, 2015 I recall 2 youngish Rovers fans (one from Chorley and one from Leyland) a few years back (5 or 6) doing similar to Dwight Yorke. They got banned and fined. Time flies PB, almost 11 years ago now!
MCMC1875 Posted July 29, 2015 Posted July 29, 2015 Boro have a poor rep re: Rovers now. This racism incident, the alleged journos with broken car windows, and an incident from a couple years ago where a bunch of smoggy 8yos were calling Rovers fans 'pakis'...all of whom were white. Idiots. There was plenty of history when they were at Ayresome Park. - the game Brotherston got sent off and gave v's to the crowd on his way off and got away with it. - the game when we had the end (rather than the corner) and they tried to scale a gate and crawl through barbed wire to get at us. - the game they refused to play one December citing injuries and got points deducted.
Amo Posted July 29, 2015 Posted July 29, 2015 Sounds like there was only one monkey in the courtroom.
ABBEY Posted July 29, 2015 Posted July 29, 2015 Boro are like nobbers ... Always crack on to be a big club but actually always behind Newcastle & Sunderland . Like nobbers always behind us n burnley
Colt Seavers Posted July 30, 2015 Posted July 30, 2015 Ridiculous. The case should never have got to court. Boro should have banned him for the 3 years and thats that. I disagree, with respect. The police will have received a complaint from a member of the public, in this case, likely a Rovers player. The police are then duty bound to investigate the incident. They then consult the CPS who make a decision. A chief factor in their decision making is whether or not it is in the public interest to prosecute. A racially aggravated public order offence will generally pass the public interest test and...bingo. A foolish old man who should know better is given a dose of reality, 21st century style!
thenodrog Posted July 30, 2015 Posted July 30, 2015 There are tens of thousands at big matches and a lot of people get carried away with emotions at football matches... it's probably why we all go. Personally if it were me who had just scored an important goal in the last minute I'd think it was funny and I'd try to score another to wind him up. A 3 season ban by Boro is easily enough punishment for a trivial gesture made in the heat of the moment, and will serve as a deterrent top others. Just as people are continually conditioned to accept social change so other peoples tolerances are lowered. What Rudy saw as a shocking personal insult John Barnes would have seen as routine abuse and ignored. Why did he get abused ? Because he was a great player and a match winner and opposing supporters feared him. Even his own supporters called him Tarmac in likening him to the black Heighway. Racist abuse, colour prejudice or a term of endearment by the scallies? You can take your pick but it would be frowned on today. It was intended humour and certainly not given or taken as an insult. Today there'd be signs up at Anfield warning supporters not to say it for fear of offence.
Backroom Mike E Posted July 30, 2015 Backroom Posted July 30, 2015 There are tens of thousands at big matches and a lot of people get carried away with emotions at football matches... it's probably why we all go. Personally if it were me who had just scored an important goal in the last minute I'd think it was funny and I'd try to score another to wind him up. A 3 season ban by Boro is easily enough punishment for a trivial gesture made in the heat of the moment, and will serve as a deterrent top others. Just as people are continually conditioned to accept social change so other peoples tolerances are lowered. What Rudy saw as a shocking personal insult John Barnes would have seen as routine abuse and ignored. Why did he get abused ? Because he was a great player and a match winner and opposing supporters feared him. Even his own supporters called him Tarmac in likening him to the black Heighway. Racist abuse, colour prejudice or a term of endearment by the scallies? You can take your pick but it would be frowned on today. It was intended humour and certainly not given or taken as an insult. Today there'd be signs up at Anfield warning supporters not to say it for fear of offence. And rightly so. Look at the furore over Woy telling that monkey joke re: Andros Townshend. Yeah he meant no offence, but his brain clearly wasn't in gear.
jim mk2 Posted July 30, 2015 Author Posted July 30, 2015 You're defending the indefensible, Gordon. Barnes and players like him in the 70s and 80s had bananas thrown at them. Just because they ignored it at the time doesn't mean they weren't upset or offended. And even at the time it certainly wasn't funny, unless you have warped sense of humour. This is 2015, and that sort of behaviour is not acceptable any more (thankfully). All your utterings show you to be a dinosaur from another age.
chris_h Posted July 30, 2015 Posted July 30, 2015 Terrible taking a 72yr old chap to court Hello Mr Coatbridge. Shouldn't you be a Sellick fan?
tomphil Posted July 30, 2015 Posted July 30, 2015 30 years ago he was probably running around with the frontline or whatever they were called. They do say your past always catches up with you.
Hanks Posted July 30, 2015 Posted July 30, 2015 Terrible taking a 72yr old chap to court Are you saying that there should be a ceiling on the age of criminal responsibility?
ABBEY Posted July 30, 2015 Posted July 30, 2015 30 years ago he was probably running around with the frontline or whatever they were called. They do say your past always catches up with you.Boro fans are scum
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.