Stuart Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 Err come on Stuart! Let's leave that in the past along with the opinion on whether or not his hands where tied because I, and others see it differently. It's impossible to ignore that shelf and GB did try to sell JR but the owners blocked it. In any book, even with different characters - that's not how you run a football club. The pertinent part is PL is payed and plied with pluck to pounce on promotion... Who would you want to spend the Rhodes money? Bowyer and Shelfy, or Lambert?The owners probably saw it the same way as "I and others" do.
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
47er Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 Well lets not keep bringing it up then! Someone is always going to respond. Its not as if its Stuart who raised it is it? When you say,Mani,that Venkys have huge plans for the summer, do you mean they are keen to sell?
dingles staying down 4ever Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 Who would you want to spend the Rhodes money? Bowyer and Shelfy, or Lambert? The owners probably saw it the same way as "I and others" do. Or as I suspect... Balaji is now bored and is not interested what happens with Rhodes when previously he has vetoed the move.
JBiz Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 The owners probably saw it the same way as "I and others" do. I doubt it - you and others knew we could be relegated in from the prem... I also have more faith in a proven manager - it's hard not to have- let's hope he finds the next "benteke"
Stuart Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 Or as I suspect... Balaji is now bored and is not interested what happens with Rhodes when previously he has vetoed the move.But with the first proper manager in five years I'd argue that the owners are more interested than they've ever been - aside from their first year as wannabe royalty.Almost makes the conspiracy theories that they weren't the owners for the first few years seem possible.
JHRover Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 I believe that when negotiating and discussing the job here Lambert sought a guarantee from the powers at the club that he would have the final say on signings and departures and that they would have to do things his way. He probably had some idea what had happened in the past with Rhodes being kept due to the owners blocking it and Cairney being sold against the manager and players wishes. They got away with it with Bowyer, but Lambert wouldn't and won't put up with it. I think that the 'adviser' responsible for lining Lambert up will have delivered these terms to the owners before he was appointed and Venkys have agreed to go along with the manager's requests. I also believe that Bowyer would have been sacked last summer, and was very close to being, but with us remaining under an embargo and having to sell some players to bring money in they decided it would be easier to keep Bowyer in situ for a while until they knew for sure the embargo was being lifted and it would therefore be significantly easier to attract a bigger name manager. Their refusal to meet with Bowyer last summer and his rumoured application for the Sheffield United job suggests his time was up, he knew it and they knew it, yet for some reason they left him in place until the club was out of the embargo.
dingles staying down 4ever Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 But with the first proper manager in five years I'd argue that the owners are more interested than they've ever been - aside from their first year as wannabe royalty. Almost makes the conspiracy theories that they weren't the owners for the first few years seem possible. I suspect the grown up owners are possibly showing an interest.......but Balaji has struck me as the little brat who soon gets bored, but not so small. Wasn't it said that it was his own money used to buy Rhodes?
Stuart Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 I suspect the grown up owners are possibly showing an interest.......but Balaji has struck me as the little brat who soon gets bored, but not so small. Wasn't it said that it was his own money used to buy Rhodes?Your description of Balaji is about how I'd describe him.I just hope all of the Circus Ewood days are firmly behind us.
Guest Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 Looks like Derby might be offloading Warnock and Bent. Would love Darren Bent here! Probably unlikely, though.
islander200 Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 Fox not signing according to Nixon on Twitter
Neal Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 Fox not signing according to Nixon on Twitter Good.
4000Holes Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 I believe that when negotiating and discussing the job here Lambert sought a guarantee from the powers at the club that he would have the final say on signings and departures and that they would have to do things his way. He probably had some idea what had happened in the past with Rhodes being kept due to the owners blocking it and Cairney being sold against the manager and players wishes. They got away with it with Bowyer, but Lambert wouldn't and won't put up with it. I think that the 'adviser' responsible for lining Lambert up will have delivered these terms to the owners before he was appointed and Venkys have agreed to go along with the manager's requests. I also believe that Bowyer would have been sacked last summer, and was very close to being, but with us remaining under an embargo and having to sell some players to bring money in they decided it would be easier to keep Bowyer in situ for a while until they knew for sure the embargo was being lifted and it would therefore be significantly easier to attract a bigger name manager. Their refusal to meet with Bowyer last summer and his rumoured application for the Sheffield United job suggests his time was up, he knew it and they knew it, yet for some reason they left him in place until the club was out of the embargo. JH, if you are correct with your assumptions and I have no reason to think you are wrong then this bodes very well for the future because at last the owners are managing effectively and a long term strategy has been put in place. Long may it continue.
Spankus Munky Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 Looks like Derby might be offloading Warnock and Bent. Would love Darren Bent here! Probably unlikely, though. Haha yeah highly unlikely after the things that Bent said about Lambert while at Villa
Guest Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 Can't say I'm bothered about Tom Lawrence not extending his stay here. He had a decent amount of chances to show what he can do but had little composure in front of goal Glimpses of good play and energy, but very inconsistent. Not an out and out striker, nor that good in the "number 10" position, so it's no loss to us. The one month loan extension probably said everything and, in hindsight, was obviously a stop-gap measure by Lambert until he got his own players in (Graham and Watt in particular). Forest and Leeds are apparently after his services.
bluebruce Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 Dunno if it has been mentioned, but Bamford has joined Norwich on loan. That should stop people mentioning him for us.
Guest Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 Haha yeah highly unlikely after the things that Bent said about Lambert while at Villa Good point! If Lambert doesn't fancy him in his style of play, then it's a no-go. Bent is one of those players who always seems to score against us. If he goes to another Championship club and gets first team football there, then that's not good!
Ricky Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 Pritchard off to Burnley so that's another we can cross off the list of possibles.
AJW Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 Fox not signing according to Nixon on Twitter. So it wasn't him in the stands at Oxford yesterday ??
SoldierMo Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 How the hell are burnley in for pritchard and qpr for roofe and we just not interested aaaargh
sharpysharps Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 Maybe Fox had been training with Rovers and they had opted not to take up the option on him? The fella in that photo certainly looked like him.
Stuart Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 Maybe Fox had been training with Rovers and they had opted not to take up the option on him? The fella in that photo certainly looked like him. Some folks were saying it was actually the team coach driver.
Neal Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 How the hell are burnley in for pritchard and qpr for roofe and we just not interested aaaargh Infuriating.
onlyonejackwalker Posted January 31, 2016 Posted January 31, 2016 Infuriating. Not really. A million and one reasons may result in any option /deal being a non - starter. Plus there are a lot of players to choose from.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.