[Archived] Site Ownership

[VinjayV4]

It's because of one of the parties involved being on holiday I believe.

Better rule out Grabko if its not him before the rumors start...

[Mike E]

Rumour whoever you like, you won't find out until it's done.

Rumourn of it being Sergei are as yet unfounded

[yoda]

It's because of one of the parties involved being on holiday I believe.

That's a bit inconsiderate, no fax machine in the hotel or what,

Where is Degsy by the way !

[ABBEY]

Rumour whoever you like, you won't find out until it's done.

Rumourn of it being Sergei are as yet unfounded

mg the puppet

[yoda]

mg the puppet muppet

[T J Hooker]

my money would be on a mighty conglomerate of tom m/mellison/k-hod

just out of curiosity what Kind of money would a site like the go for?

[VinjayV4]

my money would be on a mighty conglomerate of tom m/mellison/k-hod

just out of curiosity what Kind of money would a site like the go for?

Speaking of price might have been a good idea if one was actually advertised...or at least the running costs. Not sure if Glenn and Ste B are attempting to "sell" appears more like handing over the site/costs.

[Ricky]

You've already said on Twitter that Ste has offered you the site Vinjay so surely you must know the cost

[Al]

Rumour whoever you like, you won't find out until it's done.

Rumourn of it being Sergei are as yet unfounded

Why all the secrecy? It's hardly a national crisis is it?

[JBiz]

It's because of one of the parties involved being on holiday I believe.

I'll be back around 5 today....

[Mike E]

Why all the secrecy? It's hardly a national crisis is it?

Because the person taking over doesn't deserve the hassle they'll no doubt get before they're even involved.

Why the desperation to know? It's hardly a national crisis is it?

But in all seriousness, I suspect it's the best person who could reasonably be expected to.

[Tom]

It's me BRFCC! It was me all along BRFCC!

Disclaimer - it's definitely not me

[Al]

Because the person taking over doesn't deserve the hassle they'll no doubt get before they're even involved.

Why the desperation to know? It's hardly a national crisis is it?

But in all seriousness, I suspect it's the best person who could reasonably be expected to.

OK I'll accept that.

[VinjayV4]

Because the person taking over doesn't deserve the hassle they'll no doubt get before they're even involved.

Why the desperation to know? It's hardly a national crisis is it?

But in all seriousness, I suspect it's the best person who could reasonably be expected to.

Yes but by allowing rumors to be spread (like my Grabko suggestion as its been noted he's on holiday) and not denying it suggests it may well be that person.

[Mike E]

Yes but by allowing rumors to be spread (like my Grabko suggestion as its been noted he's on holiday) and not denying it suggests it may well be that person.

By denying things, you'd be one person closer to the actual potential buyer (who doesn't want hassle). So you can think it's whoever you like.

As far as I'm aware the only ones I've seen mentioned are sergei (a joke by me) and Grabko (a 'rumour' that I've only seen you refer to).

[T J Hooker]

I teckon i "dont have permission tou viee that attachment"

[Mike E]

I teckon i "dont have permission tou viee that attachment"

Spellchecker is your friend

[VinjayV4]

Spellchecker is your friend

Or anywhere you can buy a keyboard.

He's right though I can't view it (and not because its on the betting thread and not this thread!)

[T J Hooker]

Spellchecker is your friend

gont no wat der fruc yuu ons abuut

[Ste B]

Why all the secrecy? It's hardly a national crisis is it?

a) Its not really anything to do with you, its confidential between us and our preferred bidder.

The person/persons may not takeover after due diligence.

[Amo]

While I totally respect your right to conduct whatever deal you want, it's shame that we weren't informed that the site was up for sale.

Perhaps some of us might have been interested in taking over?

FYI... My reign would have been awesome.

[VinjayV4]

a) Its not really anything to do with you, its confidential between us and our preferred bidder.

The person/persons may not takeover after due diligence.

It is to anyone who regularly donates I would suggest. Not that it applies to me!

[Al]

a) Its not really anything to do with you, its confidential between us and our preferred bidder.

The person/persons may not takeover after due diligence.

I think you will find that I have already accepted Mike's explanation.

[Glenn]

Well, we it didn't change hands. We came close a few times, but you're stuck with us for now!

BTW @Ricky you were right. Half a dozen leave (of their own volition, I believe only 1 was banned and that was successfully appealed before I came back) and the number of active posters has gone up considerably, and that's without getting the message out yet that to a lot of the former posters how things have changed and they may enjoy coming back!