Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

[Archived] Summer Transfer/discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

I think what we all forget is the coaching thats available at the club, or has been not available more to the point.

How do we expect players to improve with the inexperienced Gary Bowyer as manager and Craig Short as a coach, both men with nothing on there CV's to expect improvement of the players around them.

You could look at Gestede as a success story, but I'm not sure that was down to coaching, Cairney went backwards, Marshall backwards and a very promising Adam Henley has gone backwards more than most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Gaz and Shorty just coached standard coaching manual basic stuff I've been told that by an ex player who worked under them. Hence the unimaginative style of play and tactics but like said not really their fault as they'd not much to draw on. Gaz in particular.

Coached and managed the first team the same way as the youth set up. The loons cheapo yes man approach to the club being the major fault there. Was very frustrating to watch though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Typical Duffy in that game, immense first half when balls flying down the pipe and last ditch tackles in a crowded box. 2nd half he's all over the place with the positional sense of a drunk wasp. Don't blame him for the last ditch tackle though as nothing else he could do there.

Like Hanley he's great in a tight defence but put balls down the side or inside of them on the deck and they can't cope, not unusual for big centre halves though.

To be fair, there was very little cover. In the 1st half, there would have been a midfielder just in front of them and that would have covered the Greizmann run. The French stepped it up in the 2nd half and the gulf in class told. Lets not forget these were players palying for Europe's top clubs against a team which the majority of the team are Championship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the rapid and almost impressive standard of signings made so far and the appearance given of a club that is going about its business decisively and effectively is all part of the con job. They know the best way of getting fans to warm to/accept/overlook the extremely odd and antagonistic appointment of Owen Coyle is to follow it up with a succession of interesting signings. They aren't that stupid. If we'd be sat here now with no new signings there would be all sorts of trouble, and season ticket sales would be even lower.

We've been compelled to act quickly and get people through the door. Thanks to their running of the club we've ended up with 13 outfield players at the club. No other club has been in such a position, so no other club has had the need to rapidly get bodies through the door before pre-season begins.

Lets not forget that as yet we haven't spent a penny on transfer fees. We've signed 3 free agents, one kid on loan and are apparently close to another kid on loan. This is after selling £20 million of very good quality Championship players in the last 12 months. So I'm holding back on hailing our business as brilliant or ambitious just yet.

I'm impressed with the Graham capture, but I think we've got lucky with him. He had such a good time personally in terms of scoring goals and being loved last season after the Sunderland nightmare that I think he's coming here more with his heart than his head. He knows he likes it here, knows he can do well here and knows he will be loved by the fans here, which is the opposite of everything he's had to put up with over the last 2-3 years. Had he not been here on loan last season we wouldn't have had a chance of getting him here.

The others I will reserve judgment on. Feeney was abysmal last time he was here, and I'm not convinced by reviews of his part in last season's pitiful Bolton team. Hendrie and Byrne might be good uns, we'll just have to wait and see. Stokes has clearly done the business north of the border, lets see if he can do it south.

I still fully expect someone to be sold for multi-millions whilst we continue to shop in the loan and free transfer market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think deep down we know it's a way of how best to cover the potential departures for very little initial outlay and paper over the holes rather than a proper rebuild job. Leaving a squad just enough to at least compete instead of a Blackpool more of a Bolton .. :blink:

Some might prefer to believe it's the Rhodes money being reinvested in wages or the Vs have guaranteed more £. I think though this is probably being done after guaranteeing the bank we'll be continuing with the model of the last 12 months and flogging players over the next 3 windows when the correct bids come in.

We were fooled under Lambert and fed another false dawn so this could well go same way :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bunkum.

Dann spent most weeks covering from Hanleys terrible positional sense and our cr@p full backs!

He's had a couple of storming seasons at Palace, winning player of the year and is on the brink of a £15m move to Everton.

Those facts alone prove the point I made earlier, you'd not know a decent center half it was written down and explained to you.

But its history now, we digress :tu:

For Rovers he proved he bad he is, at Palace he's proved how good he is... Its that simple Gav.

His attitude stank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Cheston's only words of the summer that could be believed, is the club will be run on FFP rules. So no fees, low wages and most likely anybody on high wages out the club. It makes you wonder what deal Graham is on

I wonder if they can find a way around it by offering him a set amount over 2 years on a rising scale or something or maybe even a pay off at the end if he doesn't get the 3rd year. Seems odd we'd suddenly offer him the 15/20k pwk he surely still commands all of a sudden.

For Rovers he proved he bad he is, at Palace he's proved how good he is... Its that simple Gav.

His attitude stank.

Agree on the attitude although the ability was always there he just only chose to exercise it once in a while until he knew there was concrete interest in him.

Could say the same about Hanley though and the contrast in his efforts last season compared to the 1 before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact we are even looking at Wes Brown suggests that Hanley and/or Duffy are off. Ward and A.N.Other at the back.

Also have to wonder if we have some kind of corporate sponsorship deal in the offing with Graham & Brown. If Wes doesn't make it, the more expensive Scott is in waiting. Chris hasn't signed anywhere else yet either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wind it in will you, only one coming across as four letter swear word is you, Dann was and is a good centre half, personal and stupid slurs don't hide that, @#?.

Sorry who are you to tell me wind it in? Have we ever conversed before because i cant recall? If you disagree debate it, dont come across as mister mod and get personal else you can "wind it in"... @#/? Moron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dann and Hanley were equally poor. Both flapped about, slippied around and had a clanger in them most games - luckily, sometimes we got away with them. Both have clearly improved.

Regardless, neither are a patch on Berg & Short, Nelsen & Samba, Hendry, Henchoz or Jones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont agree with that cos Wes Brown is coming in for a trial that Duffy and Hanley are leaving.

Clubs will be interested of course but they pay the asking price or not.

I see him as cover for Kilgallon. If Hanley or Duffy leaves(and it would be for a good amount), we'll buy someone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see him as cover for Kilgallon. If Hanley or Duffy leaves(and it would be for a good amount), we'll buy someone else.

You think that ant money brought in for Hanley or Duffy will go to the manager Pedro :rock:

Nothing wrong with having Brown here for training, thats a sensible approach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dann and Hanley were equally poor. Both flapped about, slippied around and had a clanger in them most games - luckily, sometimes we got away with them. Both have clearly improved.

Regardless, neither are a patch on Berg & Short, Nelsen & Samba, Hendry, Henchoz or Jones.

Felt a little bit sorry for Dann when he was with us. We had awful defensive cover from full backs when playing 4,4,2 which resulted in Dann being pulled out of position to cover. Just my oppinion of course.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You think that ant money brought in for Hanley or Duffy will go to the manager Pedro :rock:

Nothing wrong with having Brown here for training, thats a sensible approach.

Some of it will yes.

But hey, I'm just someone who goes against the grain of total doom and gloom and thought we'd be able to afford the wages for Danny Graham 😉.

Felt a little bit sorry for Dann when he was with us. We had awful defensive cover from full backs when playing 4,4,2 which resulted in Dann being pulled out of position to cover. Just my oppinion of course.

We were an awful side, with an awful manager and in an awful situation. I'm prepared to forgive him for poor form.

He looked much more assured after relegation and he deserves the credit he is getting for Palace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bunkum.

Dann spent most weeks covering from Hanleys terrible positional sense and our cr@p full backs!

He's had a couple of storming seasons at Palace, winning player of the year and is on the brink of a £15m move to Everton.

Those facts alone prove the point I made earlier, you'd not know a decent center half it was written down and explained to you.

But its history now, we digress :tu:

Agreed. I also remember Bolton away.

Awful, awful game when Wheater beat him to two headers from corners in the space of about 5 minutes. Could easily have been 4 as he was beaten time and again from a succession of corners.

He's ridden the crest of a wave at Palace. Fair play, but he's plop!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dann was poor at Rovers, for a number of reasons. Neither he or Hanley are the dominant aerially. His full backs where poor, and almost more importantly, our midfield didn't have a tackle in them,

Happy for him he's changed things around.

Wes Brown? Too injury prone for me, we need a bit of competition, he can't provide that from the treatment room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Announcements

  • You can now add BlueSky, Mastodon and X accounts to your BRFCS Profile.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.