Backroom Tom Posted July 16, 2016 Backroom Posted July 16, 2016 So yeah transfers and stuff Chat @#/? Get Banned
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Neal Posted July 16, 2016 Posted July 16, 2016 So yeah transfers and stuff Chat @#/? Get Banned Sounds like a banner for Cheston.
J*B Posted July 16, 2016 Posted July 16, 2016 Newcastle about to come in with a third bid for Hanley. Norwich and Villa also both expressed an interest. Expect both will bid once a price is agreed with Newcastle.
BlueMonday Posted July 16, 2016 Posted July 16, 2016 All the early 'excitement' about signings seems to have subsided. It's almost as if they got ALL the transfers done early to drum up ST sales. Problem is they can't even lie about potential big signings to tempt us, because they've all but admitted there's no money. Still optimistic?
Mike Graham Posted July 16, 2016 Posted July 16, 2016 Newcastle about to come in with a third bid for Hanley. Norwich and Villa also both expressed an interest. Expect both will bid once a price is agreed with Newcastle. Hanley has been pulled out of the friendly games. The writing is on the wall re his transfer. And sadly he is not even a decent player.
LDRover Posted July 16, 2016 Posted July 16, 2016 Hanley has been pulled out of the friendly games. The writing is on the wall re his transfer. And sadly he is not even a decent player. No pb, he's injured, really!! Coyley said so!!
chaddyrovers Posted July 16, 2016 Posted July 16, 2016 Rovers want 8 mil for Hanley Norwich ready to hijack Newcastle offer for £8million-rated Hanley http://dailym.ai/29E5Otcvia http://dailym.ai/android
perthblue02 Posted July 16, 2016 Posted July 16, 2016 No pb, he's injured, really!! Coyley said so!! Well as long as its not as serious as Ryan Nelsen's was as stated by wee gem 2's previous stable mate*, because that took all of five days to clear up before he was running out for Tottenham. I'm sure Hanley's "injury" will heal up in no time when he moves next week *Kentaro /SEM Franchise Operational handbook chapter 4 sub section 5 - explaining players absence when trying to move them on
davulsukur Posted July 16, 2016 Posted July 16, 2016 Rovers want 8 mil for Hanley Norwich ready to hijack Newcastle offer for £8million-rated Hanley http://dailym.ai/29E5Otcvia http://dailym.ai/android Should be demanding £10m, whether he is worth it or not. They are both flush with cash and transfer fees have gone stupid. Rinse them for as much as possible if we must sell.
Gav Posted July 16, 2016 Posted July 16, 2016 Rovers want 8 mil for Hanley Norwich ready to hijack Newcastle offer for £8million-rated Hanley http://dailym.ai/29E5Otcvia http://dailym.ai/android £8m, its almost as bonkers as that show pony going to Russia for £10m! The worlds gone mad.
onlyonejackwalker Posted July 16, 2016 Posted July 16, 2016 Should be demanding £10m, whether he is worth it or not. They are both flush with cash and transfer fees have gone stupid. Rinse them for as much as possible if we must sell. Fully agree, but then what? Allocate for debt, pinch some for another loan deal or two and decline further? It's a funny old strategy.
Mike Graham Posted July 16, 2016 Posted July 16, 2016 Rovers want 8 mil for Hanley Norwich ready to hijack Newcastle offer for £8million-rated Hanley http://dailym.ai/29E5Otcvia http://dailym.ai/android 8 million, what a joke. If he is worth £8M then I could raise a transfer fee of at least £2M, even with a dickie bladder ;-)
davulsukur Posted July 16, 2016 Posted July 16, 2016 Fully agree, but then what? Allocate for debt, pinch some for another loan deal or two and decline further? It's a funny old strategy. I typed a reply and then deleted it. Thinking about it, not a penny will go back into to the club. So it's irrelevant how much we sell him for.
Fraserkirky Posted July 16, 2016 Posted July 16, 2016 8m would be brilliant. Hopefully the transfer fee and wages will let Coyle strengthen a couple of areas, even if it is on loaners Ward and Duffy will be solid enough back there.
BlueMonday Posted July 16, 2016 Posted July 16, 2016 I typed a reply and then deleted it. Thinking about it, not a penny will go back into to the club. So it's irrelevant how much we sell him for. Yeah, we are just watching from the sidelines as the vultures pick the bones clean.
mustard Posted July 16, 2016 Posted July 16, 2016 8m would be brilliant. Hopefully the transfer fee and wages will let Coyle strengthen a couple of areas, even if it is on loaners Ward and Duffy will be solid enough back there. And then when Duffy is sold, another loan or freebie to fill the gap? The quality of our team will reduce if we sell Hanley. If it was that easy, Norwich and Newcastle would be looking at Wes Brown or Prem loanees to mount a promotion charge. Not brilliant at all (IMO).
Fraserkirky Posted July 16, 2016 Posted July 16, 2016 And then when Duffy is sold, another loan or freebie to fill the gap? The quality of our team will reduce if we sell Hanley. If it was that easy, Norwich and Newcastle would be looking at Wes Brown or Prem loanees to mount a promotion charge. Not brilliant at all (IMO). The amount of money on offer for Grant Hanley is brilliant especially when we have two very capable center halfs already in the wings. My statement had nothing to do with anyone else leaving, just merely the amount of money for an error prone Hanley.
USABlue Posted July 16, 2016 Posted July 16, 2016 On Bennett, I'd hold on to him. Stl I'd have kept Jackson around too.
roversfan99 Posted July 16, 2016 Posted July 16, 2016 The amount of money on offer for Grant Hanley is brilliant especially when we have two very capable center halfs already in the wings. My statement had nothing to do with anyone else leaving, just merely the amount of money for an error prone Hanley. Error prone? Did you watch him at all last season? He is our best player, losing him would be a massive blow even if we could spend most of the money.
mustard Posted July 16, 2016 Posted July 16, 2016 The amount of money on offer for Grant Hanley is brilliant especially when we have two very capable center halfs already in the wings. My statement had nothing to do with anyone else leaving, just merely the amount of money for an error prone Hanley. I agree it would be good money, IF we were to use some of that to suitably replace him. I think a fraction of it would be reinvested and we'll be left worse off again.
den Posted July 16, 2016 Posted July 16, 2016 Error prone? Did you watch him at all last season? He is our best player, losing him would be a massive blow even if we could spend most of the money. Thumbs up.
scotty_beam_me_up Posted July 16, 2016 Posted July 16, 2016 Hanley didn't play today and we kept two clean sheets.................
davulsukur Posted July 16, 2016 Posted July 16, 2016 Hanley didn't play today and we kept two clean sheets................. Against Morecambe and Bury in a pre season friendly! Beam me up, ffs.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.