Athlete Posted January 3, 2017 Posted January 3, 2017 Me too, but how do we get someone at the club to admit this, until the have to, as they have no more funds? If they do keep us afloat for the season and we are relegated, then starting next season in league one with -15 points, would be a nightmare. Then we'd be up against the odds to stay up again
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
EgyptianPete Posted January 3, 2017 Posted January 3, 2017 I have thought for a while that the funds from the sales of Rhodes, Hanley & Duffy, were merely being used to fund the club. Further funds have come in unexpectedly for Rochina and I think Nzonzi. Clearly Coyle stating that he hasn't been given the green light on transfers for January, makes me think this even more and I see no signings of any description in January. It feels like we are borrowing on a credit card to pay our personal loan payments. Just one question for anyone who might know. If the brother does sell his share to a consortium, will the purchaser need to pass the fit and proper owners test? If they do and it come out that someone is buying a significant share, then we need to beat the doors down, of the authorities to make sure this test is carried out properly, for once. Sorry you beat me to it with that. I didn't read this post until I have posted mine. Which horses mouth Pete? I would not be one bit surprised at that. Well not too drop him in it but it may be someone who tends the ------ think of grass
Lancaster Rover Posted January 3, 2017 Posted January 3, 2017 The fit and proper test has nothing to do with an ability to run a football club, it's a very basic test that simply check whether the prospective owner is a fit person in terms of not being a criminal, etc. All you have to do is have a clean criminal record and not be subject to any tax investigations, etc and show you have the funds to purchase said shares.
TBTF Posted January 3, 2017 Posted January 3, 2017 Then we'd be up against the odds to stay up again and hardly a big come on to potential buyers!!!
Hanks Posted January 3, 2017 Posted January 3, 2017 Lets bloody get it done this year then - going down anyway. Admin, Venky sell, relegation, debt free in league 1? I'll snap your hands off. Admin does not mean we would be debt free as football debts must still be honoured, Portsmouth were still paying ex-players wages well after administration. It is a handy way of avoiding crippling bills from HMRC. A couple of our ex players in the list for Portsmouth http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/sport/football/pompey/player-by-player-breakdown-of-what-pompey-owe-1-5468027
tomphil Posted January 3, 2017 Posted January 3, 2017 Think the same thing happened to Bradford they were paying Carbones wages for years afterwards and not at the 35k pwk rate he was owed.
Athlete Posted January 3, 2017 Posted January 3, 2017 and hardly a big come on to potential buyers!!! Well that's how it will pan out go down and in administration start league one on minus 15.... But I'd take it if it gets rid of theses shysters.. As for potential buyers we'd be picked up for nothing
Backroom Mike E Posted January 3, 2017 Backroom Posted January 3, 2017 Well that's how it will pan out go down and in administration start league one on minus 15.... But I'd take it if it gets rid of theses shysters.. As for potential buyers we'd be picked up for nothing Hopefully Seneca and the Rovers Trust will still be interested.
Stuart Posted January 3, 2017 Posted January 3, 2017 I wonder if the heating is really bust or they are just not switching it on for fear on a big bill and trying to get by with the covers etc. Crossed my mind too.
MGAndy Posted January 3, 2017 Posted January 3, 2017 If somebody emails the club and directly asks is the undersoil heating working or broken rumour is broken and no cash to fix they should answer withing a few days as obliged to do so
47er Posted January 3, 2017 Posted January 3, 2017 The fit and proper test has nothing to do with an ability to run a football club, it's a very basic test that simply check whether the prospective owner is a fit person in terms of not being a criminal, etc. All you have to do is have a clean criminal record and not be subject to any tax investigations, etc and show you have the funds to purchase said shares. It's an unfit and improper test!
had.e.nuff Posted January 3, 2017 Posted January 3, 2017 The fit and proper test has nothing to do with an ability to run a football club, it's a very basic test that simply check whether the prospective owner is a fit person in terms of not being a criminal, etc. All you have to do is have a clean criminal record and not be subject to any tax investigations, etc and show you have the funds to purchase said shares. I dont think they even check they have the funds as Morecambe are finding out pretty sure its a yes are no questionnaire they fill out,
pk1875 Posted January 3, 2017 Posted January 3, 2017 What's mike cheston's email? mcheston@rovers.co.uk
MGAndy Posted January 8, 2017 Posted January 8, 2017 Defiantly him, taken from twitter. As you can see, another fat Indian in the background (Pasha). Not sure if Coyle is wearing a parachute but.., Pasha Out !!!
MGAndy Posted January 8, 2017 Posted January 8, 2017 Time to go Your tourist visa has expired Pasha Out !!
rigger Posted January 8, 2017 Posted January 8, 2017 Not sure if Coyle is wearing a parachute but.., Pasha Out !!! you've lost me
MGAndy Posted January 8, 2017 Posted January 8, 2017 you've lost me look closely at the picture pal 😜 More likely to be a rucksack of dirty rupees on his way to the launderette in Bradford
yoda Posted January 8, 2017 Posted January 8, 2017 look closely at the picture pal More likely to be a rucksack of dirty rupees on his way to the launderette in Bradford Mmmmmmmm I have looked closely, can't see Coyle anywhere
MGAndy Posted January 8, 2017 Posted January 8, 2017 Mmmmmmmm I have looked closely, can't see Coyle anywhere because hes doing the manequin challenge in a Paul Lambert mask 😂
yoda Posted January 8, 2017 Posted January 8, 2017 because hes doing the manequin challenge in a Paul Lambert mask That would explain a few things
rigger Posted January 9, 2017 Posted January 9, 2017 look closely at the picture pal More likely to be a rucksack of dirty rupees on his way to the launderette in Bradford that's not Coyle, it's Lambert
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.