[Archived] Planning BWDBC

[SIMON GARNERS 194]

Let's put it this way...just let the hard faced b'stards try it 

[onlyonejackwalker]

18 minutes ago, AllRoverAsia said:

May as well paint a bullseye target on it if they do

Imagine the fake orders.

1000 chicken legs please for Mr. Imac Hunt, 1 Letsby Avenue. Oh and a chicken wrap, no mayo you nutcases.

[OJRovers]

Anything come of this?

[Rover_Shaun]

Of what? Nobody but Yoda knows owt

[perthblue02]

Well if it was a planning application for a Dunkin Donuts at Ewood that will not be required anymore

[Grez]

It's for a taxi rank next to the dug out for next manager to catch it from.  May also be a bus stop next to press room so next manager knows where he's going to be thrown under

[Speedie Dived]

None supporting Rovers friend has heard a rumour that Taylor Wimpey have been at Brockhall surveying and given a price for a third of the trainng ground.

[CWB]

Walker Trust own Brockhall, just for in case 2 + 2 is about to = 5

[tomphil]

2 hours ago, Speedie Dived said:

None supporting Rovers friend has heard a rumour that Taylor Wimpey have been at Brockhall surveying and given a price for a third of the trainng ground.

That's not what this rumour was about i don't think. 

[Dunnfc]

2 hours ago, Speedie Dived said:

None supporting Rovers friend has heard a rumour that Taylor Wimpey have been at Brockhall surveying and given a price for a third of the trainng ground.

Having worked there it would be a surprise as its a location slightly out there portfolio

[darrenrover]

1 hour ago, CWB said:

Walker Trust own Brockhall, just for in case 2 + 2 is about to = 5

I'm certain they don't. if the restrictive covenant was somehow circumvented, it could be bang on 4.

 

[gumboots]

But Brockhall is rvbc not bwd

[Guest]

Just now, gumboots said:

But Brockhall is rvbc not bwd

From the first page, gumboots...

On 18/02/2017 at 11:09 PM, Stuart said:

Ewood or Brockhall?

 

On 18/02/2017 at 11:15 PM, yoda said:

Neither, separate entity altogether

 

[gumboots]

4 hours ago, Phil T said:

From the first page, gumboots...

 

 

I read that. I was merely reiterating it with ref to the rumours about Taylor Wimpey. It may be true that they are looking at Brockhall but it's definitely not connected to this thread

[Tyrone Shoelaces]

9 hours ago, darrenrover said:

I'm certain they don't. if the restrictive covenant was somehow circumvented, it could be bang on 4.

 

The old " Dane St " cricket ground in the centre of Rochdale was covenanted for sporting use only.

There's an ASDA and Curry's on it now. The cricket club play at Redbrook.

" The Church Inn" bowling green right next to the Rochdale football ground was also covenanted for sporting purposes. Last time I walked past they were building houses on it.