roverandout Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 Just now, Hasta said: Serious question Chaddy. Lasr years budget on transfers was about minus £15million, we have no players left to sell and will have significantly less money coming in from tv rights and tickets. Lambert resigned because they wouldn't spend any money. Our DOF in charge of recruitement has myseriously quit. Another previous employee in Alan Myers is liking and retweeting posts saying the club won't recover until the owners leave. Why do you believe we could possibly have a budget to spend? Because chaddy lives in venkyworld where the birds sing, it rains chocolate coins and when a skunk farts, it farts rainbow dust
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Hasta Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 Just now, Bigdoggsteel said: They did spend nothing on transfers, but we did have the 9th highest wage budget in the championship. And even with the players we have left, it's still probably one of the highest in league one. Another reason why the budget will be negative.
Stuart Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 Just now, Hasta said: Serious question Chaddy. Lasr years budget on transfers was about minus £15million, we have no players left to sell and will have significantly less money coming in from tv rights and tickets. Lambert resigned because they wouldn't spend any money. Our DOF in charge of recruitement has myseriously quit. Another previous employee in Alan Myers is liking and retweeting posts saying the club won't recover until the owners leave. Why do you believe we could possibly have a budget to spend? What day is today?
martonrover Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 22 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said: very good news that Mowbray is going to India. lets hope he gets the backing he wants and can make changes to the coaching staff and signings he wants How many times have we been here before? The Raos will tell Mowbray, (a manager who left his previous club at the bottom of League One, let's not forget), exactly what he wants to hear. Once he gets back to England, it will be radio silence, and the cycle of decline will continue. Keep an eye on the first League Two manager to be sacked next season. He will probably end up here.
Bigdoggsteel Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 Just now, Hasta said: And even with the players we have left, it's still probably one of the highest in league one. Another reason why the budget will be negative. But still one of, if not the highest budgets in league 1 I would imagine. We should be competitive provided Mowbray stays
Hasta Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 Just now, Bigdoggsteel said: But still one of, if not the highest budgets in league 1 I would imagine. Errr, that's what I said.
Bigdoggsteel Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 Just now, Hasta said: Errr, that's what I said. You asked chaddy will we have a budget to spend. Yes, the highest wage budget in league 1. So that answers your question
Hasta Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 Just now, Bigdoggsteel said: You asked chaddy will we have a budget to spend. Yes, the highest wage budget in league 1. So that answers your question Ahh, sorry I thought you were making a serious point rather than just being a pedantic Kean. If a 14 man squad is already the highest wage budget in league 1, what chance Tony getting 'the budget he wants' for bringing in the other 10 players required.
Dunnfc Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 Just now, Bigdoggsteel said: They did spend nothing on transfers, but we did have the 9th highest wage budget in the championship. No we didn't
Bigdoggsteel Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 Just now, Dunnfc said: No we didn't We didn't have the ninth highest wage budget?
Bigdoggsteel Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 Just now, Hasta said: Ahh, sorry I thought you were making a serious point rather than just being a pedantic Kean. If a 14 man squad is already the highest wage budget in league 1, what chance Tony getting 'the budget he wants' for bringing in the other 10 players required. The players who left will free up wages, no? I don't know if our current 14 man squad makes up the highest wage budget in league 1.
Dunnfc Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 Just now, Bigdoggsteel said: We didn't have the ninth highest wage budget? Nope, we did by end of June 2016 which included 7 months of Rhodes etc. But that was the 2015/16 year, senior used the accounts figure published Financial year end 30th June.
Bigdoggsteel Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 Just now, Dunnfc said: Nope, we did by end of June 2016 which included 7 months of Rhodes etc. But that was the 2015/16 year, senior used the accounts figure published Financial year end 30th June. OK, so we don't know for last season so? I saw the ninth stat used on here on numerous occasions.
Hasta Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 Besides, even if we had have had the 9th highest wage bill, it relied on £15mill of sales. Without those sales to cover it, I doubt TM will be told he can carry on running at anywhere near that wage level (which was obviously my original point)
Irishrover213 Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 Tony will be told absolutely no players will be sold Bid for graham comes in he's sold Bid for Mulgrew comes in he's sold Tm wants to bring in replacement Venky's are now uncontactable
Stuart Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 1 hour ago, Suhail Slayer said: Tony will return with fluffy words agreed if he sells a few to cut the wages he can have the money to spend... venky light goes amber we sell players and speculation starts about incomings prompting a few to get excited and buy tickets venky light goes red nothing happens money vanishes Tony walks season starts Dunny steps in to save us please don't be surprised folks And the needle returns to the start of the song and we all sing along like before.
Bigdoggsteel Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 1 hour ago, Hasta said: Besides, even if we had have had the 9th highest wage bill, it relied on £15mill of sales. Without those sales to cover it, I doubt TM will be told he can carry on running at anywhere near that wage level (which was obviously my original point) We will still have a competitive wage budget at this level is my point.
Hasta Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 29 minutes ago, Bigdoggsteel said: We will still have a competitive wage budget at this level is my point. Only because we are contracted to pay it. If they could cut it, they would.
broadsword Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 5 hours ago, chaddyrovers said: I'm looking forward to Mowbray putting his own stamp on the team and playing his way. We don't know what the budget will be next season. But I did outline players we could sign and keep the baulk of the squad together. Tho I would get rid of Stokes and Steele. Plus some players do have relegation wage drop clauses in their contracts. How can anyone look forward to anything to do with rovers right now is completely beyond me. We can't even afford to keep the cleaners on. Tiny won't be able to put his stamp on the team BECAUSE THERE IS NO MONEY. It's all bad news, we're going to get relegated again. Mowbray will be walking. There's no light at the end of the tunnel, we've had it
blueboy3333 Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sport/football/rovers/news/15299242.Rovers_head_coach_Tony_Mowbray_to_travel_to_India_to_meet_with_Venky_s_to_discuss_Ewood_Park_future/?ref=mac
Pedro Posted May 21, 2017 Posted May 21, 2017 Good news that he can be bothered meeting the loons. At least he hasn't just jacked straight away. I like Mowbray and if he was our manager from two weeks before we were appointed, I think we would have been safe.
47er Posted May 21, 2017 Posted May 21, 2017 22 hours ago, Hasta said: And even with the players we have left, it's still probably one of the highest in league one. Another reason why the budget will be negative. yes, we spent nothing on transfers BECAUSE we had the 9th highest wages bill in the Championship. Even worse, we sold good players so we could pay these relatively high wages. Even worse that that, we got relegated anyway.
AAK Posted May 21, 2017 Posted May 21, 2017 20 minutes ago, 47er said: yes, we spent nothing on transfers BECAUSE we had the 9th highest wages bill in the Championship. Even worse, we sold good players so we could pay these relatively high wages. Even worse that that, we got relegated anyway. Like a cheesy advert on television isn't.........sounds better in a Yank accent Are you a crap never has been Soccer player? Do you make rubbish players look great? Do you like Doughnuts and would you like to get paid thousands of pounds a week for looking like one? If you answered yes to all 3 of those question then we have the perfect fit for you, get yourself down to Ewood Park, Blackburn for our recruitment day, run by Mike Cheston.
Dreams of 1995 Posted May 21, 2017 Posted May 21, 2017 23 minutes ago, 47er said: yes, we spent nothing on transfers BECAUSE we had the 9th highest wages bill in the Championship. Even worse, we sold good players so we could pay these relatively high wages. Even worse that that, we got relegated anyway. Our squad wasn't a good squad but, equally, it wasn't a squad that should have been relegated. Bristol and Burton both had worse teams than us but both had managers that could get a performance out of their players. Under Coyle we was always going to be a sinking ship. Eventually Cheston will have to be made to take responsibility for that decision - if it was actually his in the first place. Ultimately though all responsibility ends with the Rao family. No manager in the world can work successfully with the constraints put upon them by the owners. I do think we may have a good season in League 1 and ultimately may get promoted but that is only because we are now a big fish in a small pond. However, another few years of being a yoyo club in and out of the Championship and all that will change. Any owner of a business that has seen such a drastic reduction in value, quality and attractiveness as the Raos have oversaw at Blackburn would be forced out by its shareholders. This is why the FA has to introduce a compulsory fan shareholder stake like in Germany. We are all shareholders in this club and we are ultimately more important than the Rao family but, as the current rules and regulations stand, are powerless to rid our own club of them. It's wrong.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.